Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Libre in Inpatient Covid Units

View through CrossRef
Abstract Continuous glucose monitors (CGM) have demonstrated accuracy in outpatients and were accurate with pilot data using blinded systems in inpatients. Libre CGMs were approved and donated to hospitalsfor use during the COVID-19 to minimize exposure and PPE use. We made a prospective plan to assess accuracy of the Libre on inpatients admitted to COVID units during an initial “validation phase”. Fingerstick blood glucose (FSBG) was checked for the first three days after placing the sensor and compared to Libre values within the next 1–15 minutes. Patients were instructed to scan the sensor after each FSBG, and at other times as clinically warranted. FSBG values were recorded from the medical record (CPRS) and compared to Libre values downloaded to LibreView. The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) between FSBG and Libre was calculated for each patient for one to three days. The average MARD across all patients was calculated. Accuracy was further assessed using the Bland-Altman Plot and error grid analysis using web-based tool. Of the 21 patients assessed in the validation phase, 19 had at least one day of data and 11 had at least three days. The mean MARD was 11.2% after one day, and 12.5% after three days. Four patients after one day and three patients after three days had a MARD of 15–20% where use of the Libre was continued with confirmatory FSBG. In 15/19 (78%) patients with one day of data and 8/11 (73%) of patients with 3 days of data had a MARD <15% and continued using the Libre without further FSBG. One patient had a MARD >20% that did not improve with changing the sensor, and Libre was discontinued. In 16 of 19 patients, the Libre values were lower than FSBG. No adverse events relating to Libre use were identified. Error grid analysis showed that most patients had no values outside the A and B ranges, and very few values outside of the clinically accurate range, occurring in 2 of the 19 patients (9% of values in the “slight risk” zone in 9% in one and 6% in the other). The Libre was well-accepted by patient and nursing staff, but did not have measurable effect on glycemic control, hypoglycemic events, or hospitalization measures. The libre was deemed a useful intervention in inpatients, but it can be inaccurate or only moderately accurate compared to FSBG in enough patients to require checking accuracy for at least 1–3 days. Inaccurate Libre values were mostly lower than FSBG requiring confirmatory measures of low Libre values with FSBG in our experience.
Title: Libre in Inpatient Covid Units
Description:
Abstract Continuous glucose monitors (CGM) have demonstrated accuracy in outpatients and were accurate with pilot data using blinded systems in inpatients.
Libre CGMs were approved and donated to hospitalsfor use during the COVID-19 to minimize exposure and PPE use.
We made a prospective plan to assess accuracy of the Libre on inpatients admitted to COVID units during an initial “validation phase”.
Fingerstick blood glucose (FSBG) was checked for the first three days after placing the sensor and compared to Libre values within the next 1–15 minutes.
Patients were instructed to scan the sensor after each FSBG, and at other times as clinically warranted.
FSBG values were recorded from the medical record (CPRS) and compared to Libre values downloaded to LibreView.
The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) between FSBG and Libre was calculated for each patient for one to three days.
The average MARD across all patients was calculated.
Accuracy was further assessed using the Bland-Altman Plot and error grid analysis using web-based tool.
Of the 21 patients assessed in the validation phase, 19 had at least one day of data and 11 had at least three days.
The mean MARD was 11.
2% after one day, and 12.
5% after three days.
Four patients after one day and three patients after three days had a MARD of 15–20% where use of the Libre was continued with confirmatory FSBG.
In 15/19 (78%) patients with one day of data and 8/11 (73%) of patients with 3 days of data had a MARD <15% and continued using the Libre without further FSBG.
One patient had a MARD >20% that did not improve with changing the sensor, and Libre was discontinued.
In 16 of 19 patients, the Libre values were lower than FSBG.
No adverse events relating to Libre use were identified.
Error grid analysis showed that most patients had no values outside the A and B ranges, and very few values outside of the clinically accurate range, occurring in 2 of the 19 patients (9% of values in the “slight risk” zone in 9% in one and 6% in the other).
The Libre was well-accepted by patient and nursing staff, but did not have measurable effect on glycemic control, hypoglycemic events, or hospitalization measures.
The libre was deemed a useful intervention in inpatients, but it can be inaccurate or only moderately accurate compared to FSBG in enough patients to require checking accuracy for at least 1–3 days.
Inaccurate Libre values were mostly lower than FSBG requiring confirmatory measures of low Libre values with FSBG in our experience.

Related Results

KECEMASAN SAAT PANDEMI COVID 19: LITERATUR REVIEW Hardiyati, Efri Widianti, Taty Hernawaty Departemen Keperawatan Jiwa Poltekkes Kemenkes Mamuju Sulbar, Universitas Pad...
Burden of the Beast
Burden of the Beast
Introduction Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and its fluctuating waves of infections and the emergence of new variants, Indigenous populations in Australia and worldwide have re...
Pelaksanaan Sensus Harian Rawat Inap di Rumah Sakit Elisabeth Medan
Pelaksanaan Sensus Harian Rawat Inap di Rumah Sakit Elisabeth Medan
Processing of the daily inpatient census starts from filling out the daily inpatient census by the head of the room or the person in charge and the daily inpatient census is sent t...
PERSEPSI IBU HAMIL TENTANG VAKSIN COVID-19 TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN VAKSINASI COVID-19
PERSEPSI IBU HAMIL TENTANG VAKSIN COVID-19 TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN VAKSINASI COVID-19
Latar Belakang: kasus positif Covid-19 di Kabupaten Sukoharjo tahun 2021 mencapai 12.350 dan terus mengalami penambahan jumlah. Dari jumlah tersebut terdapat 168 kasus positif Covi...
The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic and Macroeconomics on the Sharia Stock Indexes in Indonesia
The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic and Macroeconomics on the Sharia Stock Indexes in Indonesia
ABSTRACT The Covid-19 pandemic has changed economic conditions in various countries, including Indonesia. One of the sectors affected is the capital market sector which can also de...
Long COVID Treatment No Silver Bullets, Only a Few Bronze BBs
Long COVID Treatment No Silver Bullets, Only a Few Bronze BBs
Long COVID is the consequence of having had COVID. Long COVID has many other names including Long-haul COVID, Post-COVID conditions (PCC), Post-COVID-19 syndrome, Post-acute seque...
Long COVID Treatment No Silver Bullets, Only a Few Bronze BBs
Long COVID Treatment No Silver Bullets, Only a Few Bronze BBs
Long COVID is the consequence of having had COVID. Long COVID has many other names including Long-haul COVID, Post-COVID conditions (PCC), Post-COVID-19 syndrome, Post-acute seque...
The Hidden Problem of Cross-Reactivity: Challenges in HIV Testing During the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review
The Hidden Problem of Cross-Reactivity: Challenges in HIV Testing During the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) surface glycoproteins, including shared epitope motifs, sho...

Back to Top