Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The CPT Theorem

View through CrossRef
The CPT theorem says that any Lorentz invariant quantum field theory must also be invariant under the combined operation of charge conjugation C, parity P, and time reversal T, even though none of those individual invariances need hold. It is quite strange. Why should a quantum field theory be invariant under the combination of two spatiotemporal discrete transformations, and then a quite different type of transformation (matter–anti-matter transformation)? In one of the first attacks on these and related questions by a philosopher, this chapter argues that CPT symmetry is better understood as PT symmetry. If the author is right, CPT symmetry is really saying that quantum field theory does not care about temporal orientation or spatial handedness.
Title: The CPT Theorem
Description:
The CPT theorem says that any Lorentz invariant quantum field theory must also be invariant under the combined operation of charge conjugation C, parity P, and time reversal T, even though none of those individual invariances need hold.
It is quite strange.
Why should a quantum field theory be invariant under the combination of two spatiotemporal discrete transformations, and then a quite different type of transformation (matter–anti-matter transformation)? In one of the first attacks on these and related questions by a philosopher, this chapter argues that CPT symmetry is better understood as PT symmetry.
If the author is right, CPT symmetry is really saying that quantum field theory does not care about temporal orientation or spatial handedness.

Related Results

The Dehn-Nielsen-Baer Theorem
The Dehn-Nielsen-Baer Theorem
This chapter deals with the Dehn–Nielsen–Baer theorem, one of the most beautiful connections between topology and algebra in the mapping class group. It begins by defining the obje...
Main Lemma Implies the Main Theorem
Main Lemma Implies the Main Theorem
This chapter shows that the Main Lemma implies the main theorem. It proves Theorem (10.1) by inductively applying the Main Lemma in order to construct a sequence of solutions of th...
Models of Peano Arithmetic
Models of Peano Arithmetic
Abstract Nonstandard models of arithmetic are of interest to mathematicians through the presence of infinite (or nonstandard) integers and the various properties the...
From Sheaf Cohomology to the Algebraic de Rham Theorem
From Sheaf Cohomology to the Algebraic de Rham Theorem
This chapter proves Grothendieck's algebraic de Rham theorem. It first proves Grothendieck's algebraic de Rham theorem more or less from scratch for a smooth complex projective var...
Extensions
Extensions
The classic Condorcet Jury Theorem comes with demanding assumptions. This chapter shows that similar results can be derived if the assumptions are weakened. First, if the Competenc...
Introduction
Introduction
If it lacks minimal competence to track the truth, good government is impossible. Even though a lot of dispersed information is available that would help to make competent decision...
The Calder´on-Zygmund Theory II: Maximal Hypoellipticity
The Calder´on-Zygmund Theory II: Maximal Hypoellipticity
This chapter remains in the single-parameter case and turns to the case when the metric is a Carnot–Carathéodory (or sub-Riemannian) metric. It defines a class of singular integral...
The main theorem
The main theorem
This chapter introduces the main theorem, which states: Let V be a quasi-projective variety over a valued field F and let X be a definable subset of V x Γ‎superscript Script Small ...

Back to Top