Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Augmenting mark–recapture with beach counts to estimate the abundance of little penguins on Penguin Island, Western Australia
View through CrossRef
Context
Penguin Island supports the largest colony of little penguins in Western Australia. It is subjected to a suite of anthropogenic threats because of its proximity to an increasing urban population. For effective management of the colony, it is necessary to not only have knowledge of the size of the colony, but also the population trend of the colony.
Aims
To demonstrate a new cost-effective method of estimating the island-wide population of penguins on Penguin Island.
Methods
We estimated the island-wide population by combining mark–recapture sampling over 2 years on part of the island and beach counts of penguins arriving at night around the entire island. We estimated the abundance using closed population models, allowing for sex and time effects in capture probabilities. We had four capture occasions in 2008 only, and so considered heterogeneity of capture probabilities (Mh), using the Chao heterogeneity moment estimator. The proportion of all penguins counted that arrived at the four mark–recapture sites was then used to inflate the population estimate for the whole island.
Key results
In all, 62% of all penguins counted used the four mark–recapture sites. In 2007, there were an estimated 2369 ± 198 penguins, and 1543 ± 82 in 2008. When capture heterogeneity was allowed for in 2008, this estimate increased to 2069 ± 172.
Conclusions
Fewer eggs were laid and all measures of breeding performance were lower in 2008 than in 2007. Hence, the lower population estimate is most likely to represent fewer birds attempting to breed. However, further work on population estimates is required to determine whether capture heterogeneity occurs in both good and poor breeding years. Capture rates were affected by the presence of a full moon and high tides.
Implications
The estimate of the population can be used as part of the basis of a long-term monitoring program needed for effective management of the penguin colony. However, such studies must be coincident with the monitoring of a suite of reproductive and foraging parameters if short-term impacts of threats are to be recognised and well managed.
Title: Augmenting mark–recapture with beach counts to estimate the abundance of little penguins on Penguin Island, Western Australia
Description:
Context
Penguin Island supports the largest colony of little penguins in Western Australia.
It is subjected to a suite of anthropogenic threats because of its proximity to an increasing urban population.
For effective management of the colony, it is necessary to not only have knowledge of the size of the colony, but also the population trend of the colony.
Aims
To demonstrate a new cost-effective method of estimating the island-wide population of penguins on Penguin Island.
Methods
We estimated the island-wide population by combining mark–recapture sampling over 2 years on part of the island and beach counts of penguins arriving at night around the entire island.
We estimated the abundance using closed population models, allowing for sex and time effects in capture probabilities.
We had four capture occasions in 2008 only, and so considered heterogeneity of capture probabilities (Mh), using the Chao heterogeneity moment estimator.
The proportion of all penguins counted that arrived at the four mark–recapture sites was then used to inflate the population estimate for the whole island.
Key results
In all, 62% of all penguins counted used the four mark–recapture sites.
In 2007, there were an estimated 2369 ± 198 penguins, and 1543 ± 82 in 2008.
When capture heterogeneity was allowed for in 2008, this estimate increased to 2069 ± 172.
Conclusions
Fewer eggs were laid and all measures of breeding performance were lower in 2008 than in 2007.
Hence, the lower population estimate is most likely to represent fewer birds attempting to breed.
However, further work on population estimates is required to determine whether capture heterogeneity occurs in both good and poor breeding years.
Capture rates were affected by the presence of a full moon and high tides.
Implications
The estimate of the population can be used as part of the basis of a long-term monitoring program needed for effective management of the penguin colony.
However, such studies must be coincident with the monitoring of a suite of reproductive and foraging parameters if short-term impacts of threats are to be recognised and well managed.
Related Results
The Strength of Traditional Villages in Managing Coastal Areas in Bali
The Strength of Traditional Villages in Managing Coastal Areas in Bali
The existence of Traditional Villages in Bali is still alive and active, supported by Hindu religious culture which is very thick in the daily life of the people who support the Tr...
“The Earth Is Dying, Bro”
“The Earth Is Dying, Bro”
Climate Change and Children
Australian children are uniquely situated in a vast landscape that varies drastically across locations. Spanning multiple climatic zones—from cool tempe...
Burden of the Beast
Burden of the Beast
Introduction
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and its fluctuating waves of infections and the emergence of new variants, Indigenous populations in Australia and worldwide have re...
GEOINFORMATION FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT 2020 (GI4DM2020): PREFACE
GEOINFORMATION FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT 2020 (GI4DM2020): PREFACE
Abstract. Across the world, nature-triggered disasters fuelled by climate change are worsening. Some two billion people have been affected by the consequences of natural hazards ov...
Costs and Precision of Fecal DNA Mark–Recapture versus Traditional Mark–Resight
Costs and Precision of Fecal DNA Mark–Recapture versus Traditional Mark–Resight
ABSTRACT
Wildlife managers often need to estimate population abundance to make well‐informed decisions. However, obtaining such estimates can...
Comparing fecal DNA capture‐recapture to mark‐resight for estimating abundance of mule deer on winter ranges
Comparing fecal DNA capture‐recapture to mark‐resight for estimating abundance of mule deer on winter ranges
AbstractMonitoring big game populations is necessary for making well‐informed management decisions. In the eastern Sierra Nevada in California, USA, mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus)...
Quantifying rates of coastal progradation from sediment volume using GPR and OSL: the Holocene fill of Guichen Bay, south‐east South Australia
Quantifying rates of coastal progradation from sediment volume using GPR and OSL: the Holocene fill of Guichen Bay, south‐east South Australia
AbstractGuichen Bay on the south‐east coast of South Australia faces west towards the prevailing westerly winds of the Southern Ocean. The bay is backed by a 4 km wide Holocene bea...
Influence of biological factors on hematological and serum biochemistry values in captive Adélie, Chinstrap, Gentoo, and Macaroni penguins in Pingtung, Taiwan
Influence of biological factors on hematological and serum biochemistry values in captive Adélie, Chinstrap, Gentoo, and Macaroni penguins in Pingtung, Taiwan
Hematology and serum biochemistry reference values are essential for health evaluation and disease diagnosis in penguins. However, there are currently no published physiological va...

