Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Agency Statutory Authority and the Pennsylvania Environmental Rights Amendment

View through CrossRef
Deteriorating global environmental conditions, and especially the accelerated warming of the atmosphere, have prompted a growing interest in constitutional environmental protection in the United States and around the world. Four states have incorporated judicially enforced environmental rights into their state constitutions and two of these states, Pennsylvania and Hawaii, have also made public natural resources the subject of a public trust. This Article focuses on the Pennsylvania environmental rights amendment (ENRA), a key impediment to its full implementation, and the opportunities overcoming this impediment present for addressing the existential challenge presented by climate change.&nbsp; <div> <span><br></span> </div> <div> <span>A major impediment to implementation by state agencies of Pennsylvania’s ENRA is the erroneous view that their authority to carry it out is more limited than it really is. They argue that the ENRA does not expand what an agency can do under its existing statutory authority. As a result, all too often, they do not even recognize the ENRA as part of the law they must implement.</span> <div> <span><br></span> </div> <div> <span>This Article’s basic premise is that state agencies are essential to the effective implementation of the ENRA. It is not enough for citizens and nongovernmental organizations to file lawsuits to protect rights guaranteed by the ENRA. State agencies, too, must be a guarantor of these rights.</span> </div> <div> <span><br></span> </div> <div> <span>Agency failure to implement the ENRA is an enormous impediment to the full realization by Pennsylvanians of their constitutionally protected environmental rights. It means that individual citizens and nongovernmental organizations are obliged to fight, on a case-by-case basis, for protection of their environmental rights, with little or no support from the state. Integration of the ENRA into state agency decision-making processes would put greater government resources in support of the ENRA and better protect the public’s constitutional environmental rights. As recent litigation has shown, this is particularly true for climate change. Significantly, other constitutional rights in Pennsylvania are already integrated into the day-to-day activities of state agencies. Environmental rights should be no different.&nbsp;</span> </div> <div> <span><br></span> </div> <div> <span>In this Article, we discuss three broad ways in which Pennsylvania state agencies can and should apply the ENRA, consistent with their existing statutory authority.</span> </div> </div>
Title: Agency Statutory Authority and the Pennsylvania Environmental Rights Amendment
Description:
Deteriorating global environmental conditions, and especially the accelerated warming of the atmosphere, have prompted a growing interest in constitutional environmental protection in the United States and around the world.
Four states have incorporated judicially enforced environmental rights into their state constitutions and two of these states, Pennsylvania and Hawaii, have also made public natural resources the subject of a public trust.
This Article focuses on the Pennsylvania environmental rights amendment (ENRA), a key impediment to its full implementation, and the opportunities overcoming this impediment present for addressing the existential challenge presented by climate change.
&nbsp; <div> <span><br></span> </div> <div> <span>A major impediment to implementation by state agencies of Pennsylvania’s ENRA is the erroneous view that their authority to carry it out is more limited than it really is.
They argue that the ENRA does not expand what an agency can do under its existing statutory authority.
As a result, all too often, they do not even recognize the ENRA as part of the law they must implement.
</span> <div> <span><br></span> </div> <div> <span>This Article’s basic premise is that state agencies are essential to the effective implementation of the ENRA.
It is not enough for citizens and nongovernmental organizations to file lawsuits to protect rights guaranteed by the ENRA.
State agencies, too, must be a guarantor of these rights.
</span> </div> <div> <span><br></span> </div> <div> <span>Agency failure to implement the ENRA is an enormous impediment to the full realization by Pennsylvanians of their constitutionally protected environmental rights.
It means that individual citizens and nongovernmental organizations are obliged to fight, on a case-by-case basis, for protection of their environmental rights, with little or no support from the state.
Integration of the ENRA into state agency decision-making processes would put greater government resources in support of the ENRA and better protect the public’s constitutional environmental rights.
As recent litigation has shown, this is particularly true for climate change.
Significantly, other constitutional rights in Pennsylvania are already integrated into the day-to-day activities of state agencies.
Environmental rights should be no different.
&nbsp;</span> </div> <div> <span><br></span> </div> <div> <span>In this Article, we discuss three broad ways in which Pennsylvania state agencies can and should apply the ENRA, consistent with their existing statutory authority.
</span> </div> </div>.

Related Results

On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash ABSTRACT In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Photo ID 123697425 © Alexandersikov | Dreamstime.com Abstract Originalism is an increasingly prevalent method for interpreting provisions of the US Constitution. It requires strict...
Social Rights in Refugee Law and Human Rights Law: The Non-discrimination Principle as a Harmonization Tool
Social Rights in Refugee Law and Human Rights Law: The Non-discrimination Principle as a Harmonization Tool
The European “refugee crisis” of today may lead to tomorrow’s integration difficulties. The large-scale influx of refugees has brought and is bringing many who, unless the situatio...
The Administrative Law of Federal Internet Censorship
The Administrative Law of Federal Internet Censorship
Federal action can be illegal in two ways: by violating constitutional rights or by being “in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations.” The latter kind of viola...
Grutter's First Amendment
Grutter's First Amendment
Most of the reaction to the Supreme Court's decision affirming the law school affirmative action policy at issue in Grutter v. Bollinger has focused on its Fourteenth Amendment imp...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Not Frozen In Amber: The Second Amendment And The Constitutional Right To Innovation
Not Frozen In Amber: The Second Amendment And The Constitutional Right To Innovation
This Article advances a novel claim: the Second Amendment is the only constitutional provision that explicitly protects access to a category of technological artifacts: "arms.'' Un...
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Photo by Sean Pollock on Unsplash ABSTRACT Bioethics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) were born out of similar concerns, such as the reaction to scandal and the restraint ...

Back to Top