Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Christianity and Judgment

View through CrossRef
Abstract Judgments are acts of evaluation, ways of distinguishing between right and wrong. A good judgment is a moment of truth in which is disclosed how the affected parties deserve to be treated. The Bible is full of both divine judgments and examples of God’s mercy and forgiveness. Christianity teaches that God has authorized human authorities to issue such judgments as are necessary to maintain social peace. Indeed, Christianity makes judgment the justification for, and central activity of, rulers. Judgments are pronouncements on existing actions and states of affairs. Christianity recognizes that retribution is a natural response to wrongdoing but urges rulers to seek restoration wherever possible. From the time of Augustine onward, many church leaders have urged rulers to be as merciful as they can be, consistent with maintaining public order and confidence. Good judgments vindicate and condemn in appropriate measure, defend social order, and so open up possibilities for human flourishing. Christian teaching warns against the dangers of vindictiveness, bias, and hypocrisy in judgments. Because rulers are fallen human beings, and because the Last Judgment has not yet happened, there are limits on the judgments that rulers may pass. Christian teaching and practice stress that rulers should pronounce judgment only on issues in which the public good is at stake. Moreover, rulers should be mindful of the possibility of errors in their judgments. Human judgments are provisional, limited, and fallible acts, authorized by the need to protect against violence, resolve disputes, and open up space for flourishing and forgiveness.
Title: Christianity and Judgment
Description:
Abstract Judgments are acts of evaluation, ways of distinguishing between right and wrong.
A good judgment is a moment of truth in which is disclosed how the affected parties deserve to be treated.
The Bible is full of both divine judgments and examples of God’s mercy and forgiveness.
Christianity teaches that God has authorized human authorities to issue such judgments as are necessary to maintain social peace.
Indeed, Christianity makes judgment the justification for, and central activity of, rulers.
Judgments are pronouncements on existing actions and states of affairs.
Christianity recognizes that retribution is a natural response to wrongdoing but urges rulers to seek restoration wherever possible.
From the time of Augustine onward, many church leaders have urged rulers to be as merciful as they can be, consistent with maintaining public order and confidence.
Good judgments vindicate and condemn in appropriate measure, defend social order, and so open up possibilities for human flourishing.
Christian teaching warns against the dangers of vindictiveness, bias, and hypocrisy in judgments.
Because rulers are fallen human beings, and because the Last Judgment has not yet happened, there are limits on the judgments that rulers may pass.
Christian teaching and practice stress that rulers should pronounce judgment only on issues in which the public good is at stake.
Moreover, rulers should be mindful of the possibility of errors in their judgments.
Human judgments are provisional, limited, and fallible acts, authorized by the need to protect against violence, resolve disputes, and open up space for flourishing and forgiveness.

Related Results

Concepts and Iconography of Afterlife Judgment in the Religions of the Ancient West Asian Mediterranean Cultural Sphere
Concepts and Iconography of Afterlife Judgment in the Religions of the Ancient West Asian Mediterranean Cultural Sphere
This study aims to analyze the concept of afterlife judgment and its iconographic representations as developed within the ancient West Asia-Mediterranean cultural sphere. In the af...
A Judgment Debtor in Garnishee Proceedings in Nigeria: To Be Seen or to Be Heard?
A Judgment Debtor in Garnishee Proceedings in Nigeria: To Be Seen or to Be Heard?
All other forms of judgment require execution to become realizable apart from declaratory judgments that cannot be enforced. The garnishee procedure is a legally cognizable method ...
Christianity in China
Christianity in China
In the early 21st century, Christianity in China is a diverse, growing, and small but resilient force. Estimates vary, but one informed report speculates that the number of Christi...
Holdt tesen?
Holdt tesen?
Did the Thesis Hold? By Kaj Thaning A. Pontoppidan Thyssen, D. D. - like K. E. Bugge, D. D. in his thesis Skolen for livet - has taken up a critical attitude towards my work Mennes...
Africanization of Christianity: Henry Venn’s indigenization of Christianity
Africanization of Christianity: Henry Venn’s indigenization of Christianity
The history of Christianity has always been a two-way process of transformation in any given culture. Christianity and paganism are reciprocal; Christianity is necessary for revela...
KONTEKS LAHIR DAN BERKEMBANGNYA KEKRISTENAN MULA-MULA
KONTEKS LAHIR DAN BERKEMBANGNYA KEKRISTENAN MULA-MULA
The history of Christianity need to be examined to find facts about the birth and growth of Christianity. That early Christianity was born in a certain area, in a certain situation...
Nicaea as political orthodoxy: Imperial Christianity versus episcopal polities
Nicaea as political orthodoxy: Imperial Christianity versus episcopal polities
Fourth-century Christianity and the Council of Nicaea have continually been read as a Constantinian narrative. The dominancy of imperial Christianity has been a consequent feature ...
The Concept of Reflection in the Philosophy of Kant
The Concept of Reflection in the Philosophy of Kant
The article analyzes the concept of reflection in Kant's philosophy. The distinction between consciousness (Bewußtsein) and thinking (Denken) in the structure of Kantian experience...

Back to Top