Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

P-735 Are there any differences in preimplantation blastocyst chromosomal abnormalities between polycystic ovary syndrome patients and controls? A multi-center retrospective cohort study

View through CrossRef
Abstract Study question Are there possible differences in the preimplantation blastocyst chromosome aberrations between polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients and controls? Summary answer PCOS lowers aneuploidy risk but increases mosaicism risk in preimplantation embryos, and PCOS-related insulin resistance should be investigated as a potential cause. What is known already PCOS is thought to alter granulosa cell functions and effects on oocyte development, potentially leading to chromosomal abnormalities and increasing the risk of pregnancy loss. However, few studies have compared the chromosomal status of preimplantation embryos from PCOS patients to those from healthy controls. Study design, size, duration This was a multi-center retrospective cohort study conducted at 3 IVF centers. A total of 707 blastocysts from 147 PCOS patients and 3006 blastocysts from 821 control women receiving preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) between 2015 and 2021. Participants/materials, setting, methods PGT was performed using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Differences in the chromosome aberrations were compared. Multivariate and subgroup analyses were conducted to control for confounders. Influences of insulin resistance and PCOS phenotype on the risks of specific chromosomal abnormalities were also examined. Main results and the role of chance Compared to controls, blastocysts from PCOS patients demonstrated lower aneuploidy rate (14.7% vs. 25.4%, P < 0.001) but greater mosaicism rate (16.5% vs. 8.7%, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis adjusting for age, IVF center, body mass index (BMI), total gonadotropin (Gn) dose, and peak serum estradiol (E2) on trigger day, identified PCOS as an independent protective factor against embryonic aneuploidy (adjusted OR = 0.56, 95% CI, 0.42–0.76, P<0.001) but a risk factor for embryonic mosaicism (adjusted OR = 2.05, 95% CI 1.48–2.85, P<0.001). These differences in chromosomal spectrum were also observed in subgroups stratified by age, IVF center and BMI. Further multivariate analysis suggested that insulin resistance could be responsible for the increased risk of embryonic mosaicism among PCOS patients (OR = 1.89, 95% CI, 1.06–3.34, P=0.03). Limitations, reasons for caution The main limitation is the retrospective design. Besides, methodological uncertainties still exist in detecting mosaicism in current reproductive medicine. A longer-term, multiple-center prospective study with greater methodological standardization is warranted to confirm the present results. Wider implications of the findings These results suggest that PCOS pathology may increase the risk of mitosis errors but not the risk of meiosis errors during oocyte development, and PCOS-related insulin resistance should be investigated as a potential cause. Trial registration number 2020[325]
Title: P-735 Are there any differences in preimplantation blastocyst chromosomal abnormalities between polycystic ovary syndrome patients and controls? A multi-center retrospective cohort study
Description:
Abstract Study question Are there possible differences in the preimplantation blastocyst chromosome aberrations between polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients and controls? Summary answer PCOS lowers aneuploidy risk but increases mosaicism risk in preimplantation embryos, and PCOS-related insulin resistance should be investigated as a potential cause.
What is known already PCOS is thought to alter granulosa cell functions and effects on oocyte development, potentially leading to chromosomal abnormalities and increasing the risk of pregnancy loss.
However, few studies have compared the chromosomal status of preimplantation embryos from PCOS patients to those from healthy controls.
Study design, size, duration This was a multi-center retrospective cohort study conducted at 3 IVF centers.
A total of 707 blastocysts from 147 PCOS patients and 3006 blastocysts from 821 control women receiving preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) between 2015 and 2021.
Participants/materials, setting, methods PGT was performed using next-generation sequencing (NGS).
Differences in the chromosome aberrations were compared.
Multivariate and subgroup analyses were conducted to control for confounders.
Influences of insulin resistance and PCOS phenotype on the risks of specific chromosomal abnormalities were also examined.
Main results and the role of chance Compared to controls, blastocysts from PCOS patients demonstrated lower aneuploidy rate (14.
7% vs.
25.
4%, P < 0.
001) but greater mosaicism rate (16.
5% vs.
8.
7%, P < 0.
001).
Multivariable analysis adjusting for age, IVF center, body mass index (BMI), total gonadotropin (Gn) dose, and peak serum estradiol (E2) on trigger day, identified PCOS as an independent protective factor against embryonic aneuploidy (adjusted OR = 0.
56, 95% CI, 0.
42–0.
76, P<0.
001) but a risk factor for embryonic mosaicism (adjusted OR = 2.
05, 95% CI 1.
48–2.
85, P<0.
001).
These differences in chromosomal spectrum were also observed in subgroups stratified by age, IVF center and BMI.
Further multivariate analysis suggested that insulin resistance could be responsible for the increased risk of embryonic mosaicism among PCOS patients (OR = 1.
89, 95% CI, 1.
06–3.
34, P=0.
03).
Limitations, reasons for caution The main limitation is the retrospective design.
Besides, methodological uncertainties still exist in detecting mosaicism in current reproductive medicine.
A longer-term, multiple-center prospective study with greater methodological standardization is warranted to confirm the present results.
Wider implications of the findings These results suggest that PCOS pathology may increase the risk of mitosis errors but not the risk of meiosis errors during oocyte development, and PCOS-related insulin resistance should be investigated as a potential cause.
Trial registration number 2020[325].

Related Results

The impact of blastocyst level on singleton birthweight in fresh IVF-ET cycles in ART: a retrospective study
The impact of blastocyst level on singleton birthweight in fresh IVF-ET cycles in ART: a retrospective study
Abstract Background: The positive correlation between embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes has been well confirmed in many studies, but few studies have investigated the ...
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...
Update on Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Update on Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
ABSTRACT Purpose Polycystic ovary syndrome is the most common endocrine disorder in reproductive-aged women. Polycystic ovary syndrome affects ap...
The Impact of Blastocyst Grade on Singleton Birthweight in Fresh Transplanted Cycles
The Impact of Blastocyst Grade on Singleton Birthweight in Fresh Transplanted Cycles
Abstract Background: A retrospectively cohort study was performed to compare the birth weight of different blastocyst grades in fresh transplantation cycle and explore the ...
Gremlin-1 level in polycystic ovary syndrome and its clinical correlations; A case control study
Gremlin-1 level in polycystic ovary syndrome and its clinical correlations; A case control study
Objective: To evaluate the involvement of the level of Gremlin-1 in serum and follicular fluid in the diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome.Methods: The case-control study was con...

Back to Top