Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Creation
View through CrossRef
This chapter, ‘Creation: Primal Sociality’, outlines how Bonhoeffer develops a doctrine of creation (the primal state) as a basis for constructively engaging social theory. This doctrine provides Bonhoeffer with a space within which to draw in concepts and insights from existing social theory, without thereby granting these concepts and insights general applicability (i.e. validity apart from an account of reality in terms of the dialectic of creation, sin, and reconciliation). A doctrine of creation provides Bonhoeffer with a space to begin to develop Christian social-philosophical concepts (e.g. ‘person’, ‘relation’, etc.) and sociological concepts (e.g. ‘community’ [Gemeinschaft], ‘society’ [Gesellschaft], etc.), all of which will prove integral for his ecclesiology or account of the church. In this chapter, it is further argued that Bonhoeffer is involved in a nuanced and careful corrective of existing sociology and its normative anthropological assumptions, especially as represented by Ferdinand Tönnies and Ernst Troeltsch.
Title: Creation
Description:
This chapter, ‘Creation: Primal Sociality’, outlines how Bonhoeffer develops a doctrine of creation (the primal state) as a basis for constructively engaging social theory.
This doctrine provides Bonhoeffer with a space within which to draw in concepts and insights from existing social theory, without thereby granting these concepts and insights general applicability (i.
e.
validity apart from an account of reality in terms of the dialectic of creation, sin, and reconciliation).
A doctrine of creation provides Bonhoeffer with a space to begin to develop Christian social-philosophical concepts (e.
g.
‘person’, ‘relation’, etc.
) and sociological concepts (e.
g.
‘community’ [Gemeinschaft], ‘society’ [Gesellschaft], etc.
), all of which will prove integral for his ecclesiology or account of the church.
In this chapter, it is further argued that Bonhoeffer is involved in a nuanced and careful corrective of existing sociology and its normative anthropological assumptions, especially as represented by Ferdinand Tönnies and Ernst Troeltsch.
Related Results
Cosmology and Creation
Cosmology and Creation
Abstract
Many people have observed that the “new cosmology” seems to have an affinity to, or at least room for, a religious understanding of reality. Why is this so,...
Encyclopedia of Creation Myths
Encyclopedia of Creation Myths
How was the world created? Where did we come from? Why are we here? Since the beginning of time, cultures have devised unique, often complex creation stories to explain the mysteri...
Zephaniah: An Earth Bible Commentary
Zephaniah: An Earth Bible Commentary
With astute attention to Zephaniah’s intertextual relationships with other biblical texts, Nicholas R. Werse explores the implications of Zephaniah as a book in perpetual conversat...
Genesis Remix
Genesis Remix
The divine title “(the) living God” in Joseph and Aseneth is used in conjunction with the narrative’s other language and imagery of “life” and “living” to construct a totalizing pa...
Colossians and Philemon
Colossians and Philemon
Colossians and Philemon have traditionally been overshadowed by other New Testament texts thought to express Pauline theology more clearly. In this notable commentary, however, Mar...
American Theatre Ensembles
American Theatre Ensembles
In this volume, Mike Vanden Heuvel and contributors present the history, processes and achievements of American theatre companies renowned for their use of collective and/or ensemb...
Creationism’s Web
Creationism’s Web
This chapter examines how creationists harnessed websites, magazines, museums, and institutes to rewrite history as well as the rules of science. By the end of the twentieth centur...

