Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Migrant entrepreneurship in Europe: a systematic literature review
View through CrossRef
Background:
This systematic literature review (SLR) analyzes migrant entrepreneurship in Europe through three research questions (RQs) to understand 1) migrant entrepreneur characteristics in the European context, 2) challenges encountered by migrant entrepreneurs in European host countries, and 3) policies supporting migrant entrepreneurship in Europe. This review addresses gaps in current knowledge in academia as well as issues that policymakers and practitioners face when addressing migrant entrepreneurship support.
Methods:
This SLR employed a search protocol to retrieve published sources from 1970 to 2021, via Scopus (27 March 2022) and Web of Science (7 April 2022). Inclusion criteria targeted migrant entrepreneurship support studies while exclusion criteria eliminated domestic migration and non-European contexts. The authors worked iteratively, aligning the data with the RQs to reduce bias, and adapted Bourdieu's forms of capital to create an analytical framework for the sources included in the SLR, with a table for each RQ to synthesize relevant data for analysis.
Results:
The review examined 91 peer-reviewed papers, with a focus on migrant entrepreneurship in Europe, covering characteristics, challenges, and support policies. It classified migrant entrepreneur challenges and characteristics into financial, human, and social capital, as well as external factors. Common challenges include the local culture and language, network, funding, and adapting to local business practices. Migrant entrepreneurs' stability relates to time in the host country and local language proficiency and reflects past entrepreneurial experience and education. Supportive mechanisms involve local networks, financing, and mentoring.
Conclusions:
The SLR's limitations encompass possible oversight of pertinent studies, along with potential bias in data extraction, analysis, and subjectivity due to thematic analysis. Nonetheless, the findings suggest the following research agenda for migrant entrepreneurship support: evaluating and enhancing human and social capital, sharing information, designing support programs, addressing in-group/out-group bias in support programs, and exploring bottom-up migrant entrepreneurship support approaches.
Title: Migrant entrepreneurship in Europe: a systematic literature review
Description:
Background:
This systematic literature review (SLR) analyzes migrant entrepreneurship in Europe through three research questions (RQs) to understand 1) migrant entrepreneur characteristics in the European context, 2) challenges encountered by migrant entrepreneurs in European host countries, and 3) policies supporting migrant entrepreneurship in Europe.
This review addresses gaps in current knowledge in academia as well as issues that policymakers and practitioners face when addressing migrant entrepreneurship support.
Methods:
This SLR employed a search protocol to retrieve published sources from 1970 to 2021, via Scopus (27 March 2022) and Web of Science (7 April 2022).
Inclusion criteria targeted migrant entrepreneurship support studies while exclusion criteria eliminated domestic migration and non-European contexts.
The authors worked iteratively, aligning the data with the RQs to reduce bias, and adapted Bourdieu's forms of capital to create an analytical framework for the sources included in the SLR, with a table for each RQ to synthesize relevant data for analysis.
Results:
The review examined 91 peer-reviewed papers, with a focus on migrant entrepreneurship in Europe, covering characteristics, challenges, and support policies.
It classified migrant entrepreneur challenges and characteristics into financial, human, and social capital, as well as external factors.
Common challenges include the local culture and language, network, funding, and adapting to local business practices.
Migrant entrepreneurs' stability relates to time in the host country and local language proficiency and reflects past entrepreneurial experience and education.
Supportive mechanisms involve local networks, financing, and mentoring.
Conclusions:
The SLR's limitations encompass possible oversight of pertinent studies, along with potential bias in data extraction, analysis, and subjectivity due to thematic analysis.
Nonetheless, the findings suggest the following research agenda for migrant entrepreneurship support: evaluating and enhancing human and social capital, sharing information, designing support programs, addressing in-group/out-group bias in support programs, and exploring bottom-up migrant entrepreneurship support approaches.
Related Results
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activi...
Opinions Toward Migrant Education
Opinions Toward Migrant Education
The purpose of the researcher was to investigate the opinions of migrant parents and regular classroom teachers toward migrant education. A status survey factorial design was emplo...
Self-employment and health inequality of migrant workers
Self-employment and health inequality of migrant workers
Abstract
Objective: This research aims to discuss the impact of self-employment on health inequality of migrant workers, and explore the mechanism and group differences of ...
Self-employment and health inequality of migrant workers
Self-employment and health inequality of migrant workers
Abstract
Objective
This research aims to discuss the impact of self-employment on health inequality of migrant workers, and explore the mechanism and group differences of ...
Perlindungan Hukum Menurut Undang Undang No 18 Tahun 2017 Tentang Kekerasan Terhadap Pekerja Migran Indonesia
Perlindungan Hukum Menurut Undang Undang No 18 Tahun 2017 Tentang Kekerasan Terhadap Pekerja Migran Indonesia
The availability of job opportunities in Indonesia, especially for citizens who have no skills and low education, has resulted in many Indonesians choosing to become Indonesian Mig...
Earning vs Learning: Supporting Myanmar Migrant Education on the Thailand Myanmar Border
Earning vs Learning: Supporting Myanmar Migrant Education on the Thailand Myanmar Border
<p><b>This thesis examines a particular case study of a Migrant Learning Centre on the Thailand Myanmar Border. Previous research has identified a variety of access to ...
3.O. Scientific session: Migrant labour exploitation and health: How can research foster protection of migrant workers?
3.O. Scientific session: Migrant labour exploitation and health: How can research foster protection of migrant workers?
Abstract
Migrant workers sustain essential industries such as the food supply chain, construction, and domestic and care work....
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...

