Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A Framework for Building Robust AI Agents
View through CrossRef
Agentic AI has evolved from experimental prototypes to a central paradigm for building intelligent systems. While early demonstrations showcase impressive autonomy through tool use, reasoning loops, and multi-agent coordination, production deployments of agentic systems reveal a different reality, entwined with cost, latency, reliability, and data limitations. Existing approaches, often derived from tutorials or isolated patterns, lack a unifying structure to guide end-to-end system design. At the same time, industry guidance from organizations such as OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic highlights recurring challenges in orchestration, evaluation, observability, and scaling. This gap motivates the need for a more structured, principled approach to agentic AI development. In this paper, we present a framework for designing and building agentic systems that integrates both architectural and data-centric perspectives. The initial formulation of this framework is based on our experience designing and delivering agentic systems. We then performed an extensive literature review across industry guidance and academic research, and grounded the framework in documented practice. The proposed framework is organized around four core building blocks, namely, Business Goals, Pipeline Design, Knowledge Design, and Checks and Balances, which together span the lifecycle from intent definition to production operations. These blocks are articulated across two layers: a conceptual layer that defines what must be addressed, and a component architecture that specifies how systems are realized in practice. Central to the framework is the recognition that agentic systems are not static pipelines, but evolving systems that generate signals, enabling continuous evaluation, feedback, and improvement. This perspective incorporates principles from data science, including evaluation design, feedback loops, and iterative refinement, alongside system-level concerns such as orchestration, scalability, and control. The presented framework aims to provide both a mental model and a practical blueprint for building production-grade agentic systems. By explicitly addressing trade-offs across cost, latency, and reliability, and by embedding observability, evaluation, and feedback into the system design, the framework enables more robust and controllable deployments. Ultimately, the framework highlights that in agentic AI, intelligence emerges not just from models, but from the disciplined integration of components, data, and feedback in real-world environments.
Title: A Framework for Building Robust AI Agents
Description:
Agentic AI has evolved from experimental prototypes to a central paradigm for building intelligent systems.
While early demonstrations showcase impressive autonomy through tool use, reasoning loops, and multi-agent coordination, production deployments of agentic systems reveal a different reality, entwined with cost, latency, reliability, and data limitations.
Existing approaches, often derived from tutorials or isolated patterns, lack a unifying structure to guide end-to-end system design.
At the same time, industry guidance from organizations such as OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic highlights recurring challenges in orchestration, evaluation, observability, and scaling.
This gap motivates the need for a more structured, principled approach to agentic AI development.
In this paper, we present a framework for designing and building agentic systems that integrates both architectural and data-centric perspectives.
The initial formulation of this framework is based on our experience designing and delivering agentic systems.
We then performed an extensive literature review across industry guidance and academic research, and grounded the framework in documented practice.
The proposed framework is organized around four core building blocks, namely, Business Goals, Pipeline Design, Knowledge Design, and Checks and Balances, which together span the lifecycle from intent definition to production operations.
These blocks are articulated across two layers: a conceptual layer that defines what must be addressed, and a component architecture that specifies how systems are realized in practice.
Central to the framework is the recognition that agentic systems are not static pipelines, but evolving systems that generate signals, enabling continuous evaluation, feedback, and improvement.
This perspective incorporates principles from data science, including evaluation design, feedback loops, and iterative refinement, alongside system-level concerns such as orchestration, scalability, and control.
The presented framework aims to provide both a mental model and a practical blueprint for building production-grade agentic systems.
By explicitly addressing trade-offs across cost, latency, and reliability, and by embedding observability, evaluation, and feedback into the system design, the framework enables more robust and controllable deployments.
Ultimately, the framework highlights that in agentic AI, intelligence emerges not just from models, but from the disciplined integration of components, data, and feedback in real-world environments.
Related Results
De gevel – een intermediair element tussen buiten en binnen
De gevel – een intermediair element tussen buiten en binnen
This study is based on the fact that all people have a basic need for protection from other people (and animals) as well as from the elements (the exterior climate). People need a ...
Network of Intelligent Agents
Network of Intelligent Agents
Any problem-solving can be modelled by actions or methods by which from resources or data, one agent makes an action to obtain a result or arrive at a task. A network of actions ca...
Der skal ikke lades sten på sten tilbage
Der skal ikke lades sten på sten tilbage
The Building by the Barbar TempleClose by the large temple at Barbar 1) lies a little tell, which was investigated in the spring of 1956. The tell was shown to cover a building of ...
Architecture and adaptation
Architecture and adaptation
«The architectural work transcends the architect, goes beyond the moment in which its construction takes place, and therefore can be contemplated under the changing lights of histo...
Current awareness: Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
Current awareness: Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
AbstractIn order to keep subscribers up‐to‐date with the latest developments in their field, John Wiley & Sons are providing a current awareness service in each issue of the jo...
Current awareness: Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
Current awareness: Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
AbstractIn order to keep subscribers up‐to‐date with the latest developments in their field, John Wiley & Sons are providing a current awareness service in each issue of the jo...
Current awareness: Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
Current awareness: Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
AbstractIn order to keep subscribers up‐to‐date with the latest developments in their field, John Wiley & Sons are providing a current awareness service in each issue of the jo...
INVESTMENT FEASIBILITY COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF GREEN BUILDING AND CONVENTIONAL IN DKI JAKARTA
INVESTMENT FEASIBILITY COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF GREEN BUILDING AND CONVENTIONAL IN DKI JAKARTA
Sustainable buildings generally demonstrate a friendly environment, save energy and reduce operational costs, thus opening up significant investment opportunities in green building...

