Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Co-application of thifensulfuron with glyphosate accentuates soybean injury

View through CrossRef
Three trials (two in 2019 and one in 2020) were completed at the University of Guelph, Huron Research Station near Exeter, ON, to determine if the co-application of thifensulfuron with glyphosate accentuates soybean injury in glyphosate-resistant (GR) soybean. At 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks after treatment (WAT), thifensulfuron (6 and 12 g a.i.·ha−1 representing the 1× and 2× rate, respectively) applied POST with no adjuvants caused up to 5% soybean injury. The addition of a non-ionic surfactant + UAN to thifensulfuron increased soybean injury to up to 24%. There was no decrease in soybean density, dry biomass, height, and yield, except soybean dry biomass was reduced up to 22% with the addition of adjuvants to thifensulfuron at the 2× rate. Glyphosate (1800 and 3600 g·ha−1 representing the 1× and 2× rate, respectively) applied POST caused no adverse effect on soybean injury parameters evaluated. The co-application of glyphosate + thifensulfuron at the 1× and 2× rates, without additional adjuvants, caused a synergistic increase in soybean injury at 1, 2, 4, and 8 WAT, and a synergistic decrease in dry biomass and height. All other interactions were additive. The co-application of glyphosate + thifensulfuron at the 1× and 2× rates, with additional adjuvants, produced a synergistic increase in injury at 1 (1× and 2× rate), 4 (1× rate), and 8 (1× rate) WAT in soybean. All other interactions were additive.
Title: Co-application of thifensulfuron with glyphosate accentuates soybean injury
Description:
Three trials (two in 2019 and one in 2020) were completed at the University of Guelph, Huron Research Station near Exeter, ON, to determine if the co-application of thifensulfuron with glyphosate accentuates soybean injury in glyphosate-resistant (GR) soybean.
At 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks after treatment (WAT), thifensulfuron (6 and 12 g a.
i.
·ha−1 representing the 1× and 2× rate, respectively) applied POST with no adjuvants caused up to 5% soybean injury.
The addition of a non-ionic surfactant + UAN to thifensulfuron increased soybean injury to up to 24%.
There was no decrease in soybean density, dry biomass, height, and yield, except soybean dry biomass was reduced up to 22% with the addition of adjuvants to thifensulfuron at the 2× rate.
Glyphosate (1800 and 3600 g·ha−1 representing the 1× and 2× rate, respectively) applied POST caused no adverse effect on soybean injury parameters evaluated.
The co-application of glyphosate + thifensulfuron at the 1× and 2× rates, without additional adjuvants, caused a synergistic increase in soybean injury at 1, 2, 4, and 8 WAT, and a synergistic decrease in dry biomass and height.
All other interactions were additive.
The co-application of glyphosate + thifensulfuron at the 1× and 2× rates, with additional adjuvants, produced a synergistic increase in injury at 1 (1× and 2× rate), 4 (1× rate), and 8 (1× rate) WAT in soybean.
All other interactions were additive.

Related Results

Soybean (Glycine max) Response to Thifensulfuron and Bentazon Combinations
Soybean (Glycine max) Response to Thifensulfuron and Bentazon Combinations
Field studies were conducted in 1995 and 1996 at three locations in Illinois to determine soybean response to combinations of thifensulfuron and bentazon. Thifensulfuron was applie...
Physiology of glyphosate-resistant johnsongrass and implications for management
Physiology of glyphosate-resistant johnsongrass and implications for management
[EMBARGOED UNTIL 12/1/2023] Glyphosate, as the formulated commercial herbicide Roundup�, was introduced by Monsanto in 1974. The broad-spectrum activity of glyphosate made it an ex...
Physiological response of soybean (Glycine max) and two weed species to thifensulfuron and bentazon combinations
Physiological response of soybean (Glycine max) and two weed species to thifensulfuron and bentazon combinations
Greenhouse and laboratory studies were conducted to determine the effects of bentazon on the crop safety, efficacy, foliar absorption, and translocation of thifensulfuron when it i...
Microrna Regulation of Nodule Zone-Specific Gene Expression In Soybean
Microrna Regulation of Nodule Zone-Specific Gene Expression In Soybean
Nitrogen is a paramount important essential element for all living organisms. It has been found to bea crucial structural component of proteins, nucleic acids, enzymes and other ce...
Herbicide Combinations for Weed Management in Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean (Glycine max)
Herbicide Combinations for Weed Management in Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean (Glycine max)
Field experiments were conducted in 1995 and 1996 at DeKalb and Urbana, IL, to evaluate weed management systems in glyphosate-resistant soybean planted in rows 76 cm wide. These ex...
Row Orientation and Planting Pattern of Relay Intercropped Soybean and Wheat
Row Orientation and Planting Pattern of Relay Intercropped Soybean and Wheat
Relay intercropping soybean [Glycine max(L.) Merr.] into winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) may increase soybean yields compared with doublecropping. Once the soybean crop is esta...
Sequential and Co-Application of Glyphosate and Glufosinate in Cotton
Sequential and Co-Application of Glyphosate and Glufosinate in Cotton
Glufosinate controls GR Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.), but might be less effective than glyphosate on certain weeds. Glyphosate and glufosinate applications in tole...
CONTROLE QUÍMICO DE MILHO RESISTENTE AO GLYPHOSATE PROVENIENTE DE DIFERENTES HÍBRIDOS
CONTROLE QUÍMICO DE MILHO RESISTENTE AO GLYPHOSATE PROVENIENTE DE DIFERENTES HÍBRIDOS
 RESUMO – As plantas voluntárias de milho podem causar perdas quando em convivência com outras culturas, tornando-se necessário proceder seu controle. Neste sentido, diferentes est...

Back to Top