Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Rome, Carthage, and Numidia: Diplomatic Favouritism before the Third Punic War

View through CrossRef
ABSTRACTThis article examines Rome’s diplomatic relations with Carthage and Numidia in the period between the Second and Third Punic Wars. Polybius’ suggestion that Rome consistently decided against Carthage in territorial disputes with Numidia in the aftermath of the Second Punic War (Polyb. 31.21.5-6) has often been taken up in explanations of the origins of the Third Punic War. Many ancient and modern accounts accept the implication of a policy of hostility against Carthage, assuming that Rome permitted and even encouraged Masinissa to infringe upon and seize Carthaginian territory. This paper, however, argues that the results of Roman arbitration between Carthage and Numidia do not show a consistent policy intended to undermine Carthage. Rather, Rome sought to maintain the territorial division which was imposed at the end of the Second Punic War throughout the inter-war period; several of its decisions were actually in favour of Carthage. The Third Punic War should not be seen as a culmination of a half-century of Roman hostility towards Carthage.
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Title: Rome, Carthage, and Numidia: Diplomatic Favouritism before the Third Punic War
Description:
ABSTRACTThis article examines Rome’s diplomatic relations with Carthage and Numidia in the period between the Second and Third Punic Wars.
Polybius’ suggestion that Rome consistently decided against Carthage in territorial disputes with Numidia in the aftermath of the Second Punic War (Polyb.
31.
21.
5-6) has often been taken up in explanations of the origins of the Third Punic War.
Many ancient and modern accounts accept the implication of a policy of hostility against Carthage, assuming that Rome permitted and even encouraged Masinissa to infringe upon and seize Carthaginian territory.
This paper, however, argues that the results of Roman arbitration between Carthage and Numidia do not show a consistent policy intended to undermine Carthage.
Rather, Rome sought to maintain the territorial division which was imposed at the end of the Second Punic War throughout the inter-war period; several of its decisions were actually in favour of Carthage.
The Third Punic War should not be seen as a culmination of a half-century of Roman hostility towards Carthage.

Related Results

The Topography of Punic Carthage
The Topography of Punic Carthage
In the first half of the nineteenth century, when the Barbary corsairs were finally laid low, a great impetus was given to North African research, and numerous scholars visited and...
In utero undernourishment during WWII: Effects on height and weight of young adult women
In utero undernourishment during WWII: Effects on height and weight of young adult women
Under marginal nutritional conditions, growth in utero is related to subsequent growth and adult height. The aim of this research is to compare the young adult body size of women g...
Art and Culture in the Diplomatic Ceremonial as the Basis of International Relations
Art and Culture in the Diplomatic Ceremonial as the Basis of International Relations
Currently, there is an increased interest in ceremonial culture. A ceremonial is a kind of cultural message from one social group of people to another. The basic idea of behaviour,...
The Strategy of the Second Punic War
The Strategy of the Second Punic War
The strategy of the Carthaginians, in the writer's opinion, must be regarded as an aggressive one that had been devised long before the outbreak of the war in 218 B.c. The view tha...
The First Genocide: Carthage, 146 BC
The First Genocide: Carthage, 146 BC
Some features of the ideology motivating the Roman destruction of Carthage in 146 BC have surprisingly modern echoes in 20th-century genocides. Racial, religious or cultural prejud...
An archaeological analysis of a battlefield of the Second Punic War: the camps of the battle of Baecula
An archaeological analysis of a battlefield of the Second Punic War: the camps of the battle of Baecula
Since 2002, our team at the University of Jaén's Research Institute for Iberian Archaeology has been undertaking an archaeological research project focusing on the analysis of the ...
Problems of the Second Punic War
Problems of the Second Punic War
This conflict has for moderns a perennial interest, second only to that which is excited by the Peloponnesian war. The superior attractiveness of the struggle between the Greek cit...
The Post-World War II World Order and the Unresolved Cultural Legacies of the Korean War
The Post-World War II World Order and the Unresolved Cultural Legacies of the Korean War
The Korean War has never had a notable place in American culture. A crop of recent scholarship by Korean American scholars queries the reasons for this absence of the Korean War's ...

Back to Top