Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

P69 LONG–TERM OUTCOMES WITH DRUG–ELUTING BALLOONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF IN–STENT RESTENOSIS AND DE NOVO LESIONS

View through CrossRef
Abstract Introduction Drug coated balloons (DCB) have emerged for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and mainly for in–stent restenosis or particular anatomies. However, the indications and the predictors of long–term failure of DCB have been poorly evaluated besides small–sized randomized clinical trials. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to provide a real–world analysis of the prognostic determinants and long–term outcomes among patients treated with DCB for any type of lesion and included in a comprehensive multicenter registry. Methods We included patients undergoing coronary angiography and PCI with DCB for in–stent restenosis or de novo lesions in 3 centers. Quantitative parameters for coronary lesions were calculated by an automatic edge–detection system. The primary study endpoint was the occurrence of major cardiovascular events (a composite of death, MI and target vessel revascularization) at the longest available follow–up. Secondary endpoints were the individual components of the primary endpoint, target lesion failure (TLF) or any acute coronary syndrome. Results Out of 281 patients treated with DCB, the 267 displaying a follow–up > 12 months were included, of whom 196 treated for in–stent restenosis and 71 with de novo lesions. At a median follow–up of 616 [368–1025] days, MACE occurred in 70 (26.2%) of the patients. No difference in clinical, demographic of angiographic features was observed between patients with or without an event, with the exception of a higher rate of in–stent restenosis (p = 0.04), longer and more type C lesions (p = 0.05 and p = 0.04) related with MACE. At multivariate Cox–regression, type C lesions emerged as the only independent predictor of MACE (adjusted OR[95%CI]= 1.83[1.13–2.97], p = 0.014), mainly driven by target vessel revascularization (adjusted OR[95%CI]= 1.78[1.05–2.95], p = 0.03) although not conditioning survival. However, in–stent restenosis emerged as a major determinant of TLF (adjusted OR[95%CI]= 2.59[1.17–5.75], p = 0.02). Conclusion The present registry shows that drug–coated balloons represent a potential treatment strategy even for de–novo lesions, especially in less complex cases. In fact, we observed an increased risk of MACE and target lesion failure in case of type C and restenotic lesions.
Title: P69 LONG–TERM OUTCOMES WITH DRUG–ELUTING BALLOONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF IN–STENT RESTENOSIS AND DE NOVO LESIONS
Description:
Abstract Introduction Drug coated balloons (DCB) have emerged for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and mainly for in–stent restenosis or particular anatomies.
However, the indications and the predictors of long–term failure of DCB have been poorly evaluated besides small–sized randomized clinical trials.
Therefore, the aim of the present study was to provide a real–world analysis of the prognostic determinants and long–term outcomes among patients treated with DCB for any type of lesion and included in a comprehensive multicenter registry.
Methods We included patients undergoing coronary angiography and PCI with DCB for in–stent restenosis or de novo lesions in 3 centers.
Quantitative parameters for coronary lesions were calculated by an automatic edge–detection system.
The primary study endpoint was the occurrence of major cardiovascular events (a composite of death, MI and target vessel revascularization) at the longest available follow–up.
Secondary endpoints were the individual components of the primary endpoint, target lesion failure (TLF) or any acute coronary syndrome.
Results Out of 281 patients treated with DCB, the 267 displaying a follow–up > 12 months were included, of whom 196 treated for in–stent restenosis and 71 with de novo lesions.
At a median follow–up of 616 [368–1025] days, MACE occurred in 70 (26.
2%) of the patients.
No difference in clinical, demographic of angiographic features was observed between patients with or without an event, with the exception of a higher rate of in–stent restenosis (p = 0.
04), longer and more type C lesions (p = 0.
05 and p = 0.
04) related with MACE.
At multivariate Cox–regression, type C lesions emerged as the only independent predictor of MACE (adjusted OR[95%CI]= 1.
83[1.
13–2.
97], p = 0.
014), mainly driven by target vessel revascularization (adjusted OR[95%CI]= 1.
78[1.
05–2.
95], p = 0.
03) although not conditioning survival.
However, in–stent restenosis emerged as a major determinant of TLF (adjusted OR[95%CI]= 2.
59[1.
17–5.
75], p = 0.
02).
Conclusion The present registry shows that drug–coated balloons represent a potential treatment strategy even for de–novo lesions, especially in less complex cases.
In fact, we observed an increased risk of MACE and target lesion failure in case of type C and restenotic lesions.

Related Results

Predictors of insistent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous intervention
Predictors of insistent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous intervention
Coronary artery disease is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The first percutaneous coronary intervention was performed by Andreas Gruntzig on Septemb...
Crush Stenting With Paclitaxel-Eluting or Sirolimus-Eluting Stents for the Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions
Crush Stenting With Paclitaxel-Eluting or Sirolimus-Eluting Stents for the Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions
Two hundred forty-six patients with 252 bifurcation lesions were enrolled into a prospective, nonrandomized study to use paclitaxel-eluting or sirolimus-eluting stent for crush ste...
Incidence and Management of In-Stent Restenosis in Patients with Drug-Eluting Stents
Incidence and Management of In-Stent Restenosis in Patients with Drug-Eluting Stents
Introduction: The most prevalent complication of cardiac intervention is restenosis. After the BMS period, drug-eluting stents (DES) are the most suitable choice for stenosis treat...
In-stent restenosis in the drug-eluting stent era
In-stent restenosis in the drug-eluting stent era
For the last two decades, restenosis has been considered the most significant problem in interventional cardiology. Drug-eluting stents (DES) have reduced rates of restenosis and t...
Effectiveness and safety of the sirolimus‐eluting stents coated with bioabsorbable polymer coating in human coronary arteries
Effectiveness and safety of the sirolimus‐eluting stents coated with bioabsorbable polymer coating in human coronary arteries
AbstractBackground: Although the sirolimus‐eluting stent (CYPHER®, Cordis, USA) has shown a dramatic reduction of restenosis, there are still some concerns about its efficacy and s...
4079The future of recurring restenosis prediction - Urinary cysteinyl leukotriene e4
4079The future of recurring restenosis prediction - Urinary cysteinyl leukotriene e4
Abstract Background Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is one of the common atherosclerosis manifestations. However endovascular tr...

Back to Top