Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Acceptance of marginalized couples
View through CrossRef
Marginalized couples (i.e., those seen as dissimilar from the socialized standard) are still not completely accepted (Lehmiller & Agnew, 2006). Almost 50% of Americans still disapprove of Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual (LGB) couples (Changing Attitudes on Gay Marriage, 2015) and almost 13% disapprove of interracial/interethnic couples (Newport, 2013). When these couples perceive stigma due to their relationships, negative outcomes such as higher levels of depression, can occur (LeBlanc, Frost, & Wight, 2015). Previous research has identified personal factors that are similar for the acceptance of both types of marginalized couples: non-White, Republican, politically conservative, men, less educated, more religious, and older adult individuals were less accepting of both types of relationships (Haider-Markel & Joslyn, 2005). Couple composition also affects acceptance, such that Black/White couples were less accepted than Asian/White couples (Eliason, 1997; Herek, 2002; Lewandowski, 2001). This study sought to discover if acceptance of LGB couples could predict the acceptance of interracial/interethnic couples. The participant pool consisted of 152 Mississippi State University students who were taking a psychology class and were recruited via SONA systems. Multiple regression analyses and Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric tests were conducted to test the 3 hypotheses. Hypothesis1 was partially supported. Political conservatism and religiosity correlated significantly with both attitudes toward interracial/interethnic couples and LGB couples. Hypothesis 2a was not supported. Black/Black couples were significantly supported more than White/White couples. Hypothesis 2b was partially supported. Heterosexual man/Bisexual woman was accepted more than Gay man/Bisexual man. Hypothesis 3 was fully supported with attitudes toward LGB couples predicting attitudes towards interracial/interethnic couples. Future studies should use a larger sample size and examine other types of marginalized couples (e.g., age gap couples).
Mississippi State University Libraries
Title: Acceptance of marginalized couples
Description:
Marginalized couples (i.
e.
, those seen as dissimilar from the socialized standard) are still not completely accepted (Lehmiller & Agnew, 2006).
Almost 50% of Americans still disapprove of Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual (LGB) couples (Changing Attitudes on Gay Marriage, 2015) and almost 13% disapprove of interracial/interethnic couples (Newport, 2013).
When these couples perceive stigma due to their relationships, negative outcomes such as higher levels of depression, can occur (LeBlanc, Frost, & Wight, 2015).
Previous research has identified personal factors that are similar for the acceptance of both types of marginalized couples: non-White, Republican, politically conservative, men, less educated, more religious, and older adult individuals were less accepting of both types of relationships (Haider-Markel & Joslyn, 2005).
Couple composition also affects acceptance, such that Black/White couples were less accepted than Asian/White couples (Eliason, 1997; Herek, 2002; Lewandowski, 2001).
This study sought to discover if acceptance of LGB couples could predict the acceptance of interracial/interethnic couples.
The participant pool consisted of 152 Mississippi State University students who were taking a psychology class and were recruited via SONA systems.
Multiple regression analyses and Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric tests were conducted to test the 3 hypotheses.
Hypothesis1 was partially supported.
Political conservatism and religiosity correlated significantly with both attitudes toward interracial/interethnic couples and LGB couples.
Hypothesis 2a was not supported.
Black/Black couples were significantly supported more than White/White couples.
Hypothesis 2b was partially supported.
Heterosexual man/Bisexual woman was accepted more than Gay man/Bisexual man.
Hypothesis 3 was fully supported with attitudes toward LGB couples predicting attitudes towards interracial/interethnic couples.
Future studies should use a larger sample size and examine other types of marginalized couples (e.
g.
, age gap couples).
Related Results
An empirical analysis of the matching patterns of same-sex and opposite-sex couples
An empirical analysis of the matching patterns of same-sex and opposite-sex couples
AbstractWe used 1990 Census data to compare the matching behaviors of four types of cohabiting couples: same-sex male couples, same-sex female couples, opposite-sex unmarried coupl...
Couples’ fertility intentions and contraceptive use in Ethiopia
Couples’ fertility intentions and contraceptive use in Ethiopia
Abstract
Background:
While fertility and family planning studies have primarily centred around women, the perspectives of men within couples remain insufficiently explored ...
UNCONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE IN CRISIS WORK BASED ON THE LIVED EXPERIENCE OF MALAYSIAN COUNSELORS
UNCONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE IN CRISIS WORK BASED ON THE LIVED EXPERIENCE OF MALAYSIAN COUNSELORS
Unconditional acceptance is one of the core attitudes in helping professionals to establish successful therapeutic relationships. Despite unconditional acceptance was accepted in m...
Qualitative Approaches to Studying Marginalized Communities
Qualitative Approaches to Studying Marginalized Communities
Marginalized populations are by definition composed of people who have fewer possibilities and options in their lives than those studying them. This fact has to be reflected before...
The Effects of Marital Conflict Management Program for Multi-cultural Couples based on Gottman Theory
The Effects of Marital Conflict Management Program for Multi-cultural Couples based on Gottman Theory
The purposes of this study is to develop conflict management program for multicultural couples and to verify the effects on communication, conflict coping style, and marital satisf...
Voices and Choices of HIV-serodiscordant Heterosexual Couples
Voices and Choices of HIV-serodiscordant Heterosexual Couples
There is limited information regarding serodiscordancy. HIV-serodiscordant couples face challenges in their relationships, this is likely to threaten their relationship’s and they ...
A STUDY ON FACTORS INFLUENCING CONTRACEPTIVE PRACTICES AMONG ELIGIBLE COUPLES OF URBAN FIELD PRACTICE AREA, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY MEDICINE, FACULTY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES KHAJA BANDA NAWAZ UNIVERSITY, KALABURAGI
A STUDY ON FACTORS INFLUENCING CONTRACEPTIVE PRACTICES AMONG ELIGIBLE COUPLES OF URBAN FIELD PRACTICE AREA, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY MEDICINE, FACULTY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES KHAJA BANDA NAWAZ UNIVERSITY, KALABURAGI
Background: According to Census 2011, India's population stood at 1,21,01,93,422, and the last decade has seen India's
population growth by 17.64%. This high growth rate in India i...
P-072 Fresh testicular sperm seems to yield more fertilization abnormalities and early pregnancy loss than frozen testicular sperm
P-072 Fresh testicular sperm seems to yield more fertilization abnormalities and early pregnancy loss than frozen testicular sperm
Abstract
Study question
How do ICSI outcomes using fresh testicular sperm, compare to those using frozen samples cryopreserved f...

