Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Abductive Reasoning: A Design Thinking Experiment

View through CrossRef
AbstractDesign thinking fundamentally relies on abductive reasoning. Diverse thinking types such as divergent thinking, systems thinking, and empathetic thinking have been adopted in design thinking education. Yet, it is very rare to address abductive reasoning to be integrated in a design thinking course because of deductive validity and inductive strength. In practice, the quality of design thinking is judged from design outcomes in terms of creativity and innovation rather than the application of abductive reasoning in thinking that is necessary for educators to develop diverse instructional strategies for design thinking. Through a design thinking experiment where abductive reasoning was structured for groups of students to modify their chosen fairy stories by challenging identified lessons/values/beliefs, we articulated relevant strategies from case analysis. As a result, we discovered the following six strategies for abductive reasoning: questioning on socially given identity; restructuring a hierarchy of values; de‐ and re‐contextualisation; perspective‐taking; being intersubjective through body swapping; and developing imaginative empathy for compassion. The six strategies support pedagogical aspects of design thinking such as collaborative problem‐solving and analytic and empathetic engagement; and thus, design educators can use them in developing instructional strategies to facilitate abductive reasoning in design thinking.
Title: Abductive Reasoning: A Design Thinking Experiment
Description:
AbstractDesign thinking fundamentally relies on abductive reasoning.
Diverse thinking types such as divergent thinking, systems thinking, and empathetic thinking have been adopted in design thinking education.
Yet, it is very rare to address abductive reasoning to be integrated in a design thinking course because of deductive validity and inductive strength.
In practice, the quality of design thinking is judged from design outcomes in terms of creativity and innovation rather than the application of abductive reasoning in thinking that is necessary for educators to develop diverse instructional strategies for design thinking.
Through a design thinking experiment where abductive reasoning was structured for groups of students to modify their chosen fairy stories by challenging identified lessons/values/beliefs, we articulated relevant strategies from case analysis.
As a result, we discovered the following six strategies for abductive reasoning: questioning on socially given identity; restructuring a hierarchy of values; de‐ and re‐contextualisation; perspective‐taking; being intersubjective through body swapping; and developing imaginative empathy for compassion.
The six strategies support pedagogical aspects of design thinking such as collaborative problem‐solving and analytic and empathetic engagement; and thus, design educators can use them in developing instructional strategies to facilitate abductive reasoning in design thinking.

Related Results

A concept analysis of abductive reasoning
A concept analysis of abductive reasoning
AbstractAimTo describe an analysis of the concept of abductive reasoning.BackgroundIn the discipline of nursing, abductive reasoning has received only philosophical attention and r...
Critical Thinking in Business Research
Critical Thinking in Business Research
Abstract Critical thinking is more than just fault-finding—it involves a range of thinking processes, including interpreting, analyzing, evaluating, inferencing, ...
Analitičko rasuđivanje i uvjerenja koja proizvode polarizaciju
Analitičko rasuđivanje i uvjerenja koja proizvode polarizaciju
Introduction: Reason has always been considered an essential feature of our species, leading us to tremendous progress in the evolutionarily very short time of our existence. On th...
Theorising and practitioners in HRD: the role of abductive reasoning
Theorising and practitioners in HRD: the role of abductive reasoning
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to argue that abductive reasoning is a typical but usually unrecognised process used by HRD scholars and practitioners alike.Design/methodology/...
Design
Design
Conventional definitions of design rarely capture its reach into our everyday lives. The Design Council, for example, estimates that more than 2.5 million people use design-related...
Explaining the concept of abductive reasoning and its capacities and applications in psychological studies and counseling
Explaining the concept of abductive reasoning and its capacities and applications in psychological studies and counseling
Objective: abductive reasoning is one of the methods of reasoning that, despite the fact that it has been criticized by many scientists and philosophers, today some consider its ap...
Indirect reciprocity with abductive reasoning
Indirect reciprocity with abductive reasoning
Indirect reciprocity is a reputational mechanism through which cooperative behavior can be promoted amongst a group of individuals. However, in order for this mechanism to effectiv...

Back to Top