Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan Initiated During Hospitalization: Data from a Non-Selected Cohort

View through CrossRef
Abstract Aims Sacubitril/valsartan is safe when initiated during hospitalization in a clinical trial setting. Its safety in real-life population is not stablished. We compared the initiation of sacubitril/valsartan during hospitalization in a non-selected population, in the PIONEER-HF trial, and in non-selected outpatients. Methods and results Multicentre registry included 527 patients: 100 were started on sacubitril/valsartan during hospitalization (19.0%) and 427 as outpatients (81.0%). Compared with those in the pivotal trial, inpatients in our cohort were older (71 ± 12 vs. 61 ± 14 years; P < 0.001); had more frequently Functional Class II (41 [41.0%] vs. 100 [22.7%]; P < 0.001), higher levels of N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (4044 [1630–8680] vs. 2013 [1002–4132] pg/mL; P < 0.001), better glomerular filtration rate (63.5 [51.0–80.0] vs. 58.4 [47.5–71.5] mL/min; P = 0.01), and higher systolic blood pressure (121 [110–136] vs. 118 [110–133] mmHg; P = 0.03); and received angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers more frequently (92 [92.0%] vs. 208 [52.7%]; P < 0.001). Compared with non-selected outpatients, inpatients were older (71 ± 12 vs. 68 ± 12 years, P = 0.02), had more frequent Functional Class III–IV (58 [58.0%] vs. 129 [30.3%], P < 0.001), had higher levels of N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (4044 [1630–8680] vs. 2182 [1134–4172]; P < 0.001), and were receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers target dose less frequently (55 [55.0%] vs. 335 [78.5%]; P < 0.001). They also started sacubitril/valsartan with a low dose (50 mg/12 h) more frequently (80 [80.0%] vs. 209 [48.8%], P < 0.001). The initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in outpatients was an independent predictor of high-dose use (OR 3.1; 95% confidence interval 1.7–5.6, P < 0.001). The follow-up time in both cohorts, including all patients enrolled, was similar (7.0 ± 0.1 vs. 7.2 ± 2.6 months, P = 0.72). All-cause admissions during follow-up were more frequent in inpatients (30 [30.0%] vs. 68 outpatients [15.9%], P = 0.001), with no relevant differences in all-cause mortality. There was no significant difference in sacubitril/valsartan withdrawal rate (17 inpatients [17.0%] vs. 49 outpatients [11.5%], P = 0.13). The incidence of adverse effects was also similar: hypotension (16 inpatients [16.0%] vs. 71 outpatients [16.7%], P = 0.88), worsening renal function (7 inpatients [7.0%] vs. 29 outpatients [6.8%], P = 0.94), and hyperkalaemia (1 inpatient [1.0%] vs. 21 outpatients [4.9%], P = 0.09). We did not register any case of angioedema. Conclusions It is safe to initiate sacubitril/valsartan during hospitalization in daily clinical practice. Inpatients have a higher risk profile and receive low starting doses more frequently than outpatients.
Title: Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan Initiated During Hospitalization: Data from a Non-Selected Cohort
Description:
Abstract Aims Sacubitril/valsartan is safe when initiated during hospitalization in a clinical trial setting.
Its safety in real-life population is not stablished.
We compared the initiation of sacubitril/valsartan during hospitalization in a non-selected population, in the PIONEER-HF trial, and in non-selected outpatients.
Methods and results Multicentre registry included 527 patients: 100 were started on sacubitril/valsartan during hospitalization (19.
0%) and 427 as outpatients (81.
0%).
Compared with those in the pivotal trial, inpatients in our cohort were older (71 ± 12 vs.
61 ± 14 years; P < 0.
001); had more frequently Functional Class II (41 [41.
0%] vs.
100 [22.
7%]; P < 0.
001), higher levels of N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (4044 [1630–8680] vs.
2013 [1002–4132] pg/mL; P < 0.
001), better glomerular filtration rate (63.
5 [51.
0–80.
0] vs.
58.
4 [47.
5–71.
5] mL/min; P = 0.
01), and higher systolic blood pressure (121 [110–136] vs.
118 [110–133] mmHg; P = 0.
03); and received angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers more frequently (92 [92.
0%] vs.
208 [52.
7%]; P < 0.
001).
Compared with non-selected outpatients, inpatients were older (71 ± 12 vs.
68 ± 12 years, P = 0.
02), had more frequent Functional Class III–IV (58 [58.
0%] vs.
129 [30.
3%], P < 0.
001), had higher levels of N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (4044 [1630–8680] vs.
2182 [1134–4172]; P < 0.
001), and were receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers target dose less frequently (55 [55.
0%] vs.
335 [78.
5%]; P < 0.
001).
They also started sacubitril/valsartan with a low dose (50 mg/12 h) more frequently (80 [80.
0%] vs.
209 [48.
8%], P < 0.
001).
The initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in outpatients was an independent predictor of high-dose use (OR 3.
1; 95% confidence interval 1.
7–5.
6, P < 0.
001).
The follow-up time in both cohorts, including all patients enrolled, was similar (7.
0 ± 0.
1 vs.
7.
2 ± 2.
6 months, P = 0.
72).
All-cause admissions during follow-up were more frequent in inpatients (30 [30.
0%] vs.
68 outpatients [15.
9%], P = 0.
001), with no relevant differences in all-cause mortality.
There was no significant difference in sacubitril/valsartan withdrawal rate (17 inpatients [17.
0%] vs.
49 outpatients [11.
5%], P = 0.
13).
The incidence of adverse effects was also similar: hypotension (16 inpatients [16.
0%] vs.
71 outpatients [16.
7%], P = 0.
88), worsening renal function (7 inpatients [7.
0%] vs.
29 outpatients [6.
8%], P = 0.
94), and hyperkalaemia (1 inpatient [1.
0%] vs.
21 outpatients [4.
9%], P = 0.
09).
We did not register any case of angioedema.
Conclusions It is safe to initiate sacubitril/valsartan during hospitalization in daily clinical practice.
Inpatients have a higher risk profile and receive low starting doses more frequently than outpatients.

Related Results

Sacubitril/valsartan in patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
Sacubitril/valsartan in patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
Background: Sacubitril/valsartan is a combination drug therapy for heart failure (HF) patients that has been shown to reduce mortality and hospitalisation. Aims: To explore clinica...
Evaluation of Sacubitril/Valsartan Initiation in Outpatient Heart Failure Patients
Evaluation of Sacubitril/Valsartan Initiation in Outpatient Heart Failure Patients
Abstract: Despite sacubitril/valsartan being on the market since 2015, clinicians are still determining the best way to initiate therapy to optimize outcomes and minimize...
Kajian Literatur Profil Farmakokinetika Sacubitril-Valsartan Pada Subjek Sehat dan Gagal Jantung
Kajian Literatur Profil Farmakokinetika Sacubitril-Valsartan Pada Subjek Sehat dan Gagal Jantung
Abstract. Sacubitril-Valsartan is a first-class therapeutic agent for ARNI (Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor) which can reduce blood pressure and reduce mortality and morb...
DEVELOPMENT OF ASSAY METHOD AND FORCED DEGRADATION STUDY OF VALSARTAN AND SACUBITRIL BY RP-HPLC IN TABLET FORMULATION
DEVELOPMENT OF ASSAY METHOD AND FORCED DEGRADATION STUDY OF VALSARTAN AND SACUBITRIL BY RP-HPLC IN TABLET FORMULATION
Objective: A stability-indicating high performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method was developed and validated for the estimation of combined tablet formulation of valsartan a...
A New Mechanism of Action in Heart Failure
A New Mechanism of Action in Heart Failure
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and clinical significance of sacubitril/valsartan (Entresto) in patients with heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). D...

Back to Top