Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Clinical study reports published by the European Medicines Agency 2016–2018: a cross-sectional analysis

View through CrossRef
ObjectivesTo describe the characteristics of clinical study report (CSR) documents published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and for included pivotal trials, to quantify the timeliness of access to trial results from CSRs compared with conventional published sources.DesignCross-sectional analysis of CSR documents published by the EMA from 2016 to 2018.MethodsCSR files and medication summary information were downloaded from the EMA. Individual trials in each submission were identified using document filenames. Number and length of documents and trials were determined. For pivotal trials, trial phase, dates of EMA document publication and matched journal and registry publications were obtained.ResultsThe EMA published documents on 142 medications that were submitted for regulatory drug approval. Submissions were for initial marketing authorisations in 64.1%. There was a median of 15 (IQR 5–46) documents, 5 (IQR 2–14) trials and 9629 (IQR 2711–26,673) pages per submission, and a median of 1 (IQR 1–4) document and 336 (IQR 21–1192) pages per trial. Of all identified pivotal trials, 60.9% were phase 3 and 18.5% were phase 1. Of 119 unique submissions to the EMA, 46.2% were supported by a single pivotal trial, with 13.4% based on a single pivotal phase 1 trial. No trial registry results were identified for 26.1% trials, no journal publications for 16.7% and 13.5% of trials had neither. EMA publication was the earliest information source for 5.8% of pivotal trials, available a median 523 days (IQR 363–882 days) before the earliest publication.ConclusionsThe EMA Clinical Data website contains lengthy clinical trial documents. Almost half of submissions to the EMA were based on single pivotal trials, many of which were phase 1 trials. CSRs were the only source and a timelier source of information for many trials. Access to unpublished trial information should be open and timely to support decision-making for patients.
Title: Clinical study reports published by the European Medicines Agency 2016–2018: a cross-sectional analysis
Description:
ObjectivesTo describe the characteristics of clinical study report (CSR) documents published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and for included pivotal trials, to quantify the timeliness of access to trial results from CSRs compared with conventional published sources.
DesignCross-sectional analysis of CSR documents published by the EMA from 2016 to 2018.
MethodsCSR files and medication summary information were downloaded from the EMA.
Individual trials in each submission were identified using document filenames.
Number and length of documents and trials were determined.
For pivotal trials, trial phase, dates of EMA document publication and matched journal and registry publications were obtained.
ResultsThe EMA published documents on 142 medications that were submitted for regulatory drug approval.
Submissions were for initial marketing authorisations in 64.
1%.
There was a median of 15 (IQR 5–46) documents, 5 (IQR 2–14) trials and 9629 (IQR 2711–26,673) pages per submission, and a median of 1 (IQR 1–4) document and 336 (IQR 21–1192) pages per trial.
Of all identified pivotal trials, 60.
9% were phase 3 and 18.
5% were phase 1.
Of 119 unique submissions to the EMA, 46.
2% were supported by a single pivotal trial, with 13.
4% based on a single pivotal phase 1 trial.
No trial registry results were identified for 26.
1% trials, no journal publications for 16.
7% and 13.
5% of trials had neither.
EMA publication was the earliest information source for 5.
8% of pivotal trials, available a median 523 days (IQR 363–882 days) before the earliest publication.
ConclusionsThe EMA Clinical Data website contains lengthy clinical trial documents.
Almost half of submissions to the EMA were based on single pivotal trials, many of which were phase 1 trials.
CSRs were the only source and a timelier source of information for many trials.
Access to unpublished trial information should be open and timely to support decision-making for patients.

Related Results

A Case Study of the Registration of Essential Medicines in the East African Community
A Case Study of the Registration of Essential Medicines in the East African Community
Abstract Objective: To quantify the essential medicine status of registered medicines in the East African Community (EAC) for antimicrobial medicines and medicines for non-...
The availability of medicines in Spain
The availability of medicines in Spain
In the European Union (EU) procedures for the authorization of medicinal products are applied to incorporate new medicinal products and their successive amendments under the same c...
The assessment of awareness about the rational use of medicines among ukrainian pharmacy students
The assessment of awareness about the rational use of medicines among ukrainian pharmacy students
Aim. To study the awareness of graduate pharmacy students with the concept of the “rational use of medicines” and related issues. Materials and methods. A questionnaire survey of 1...
Chronic conditions, financial burden and pharmaceutical pricing: insights from Australian consumers
Chronic conditions, financial burden and pharmaceutical pricing: insights from Australian consumers
Objective To explore the perceptions of Australian consumers and carers about the financial burden associated with medicines used for the treatment of chronic conditions. Method Se...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
The Hidden Problem of Cross-Reactivity: Challenges in HIV Testing During the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review
The Hidden Problem of Cross-Reactivity: Challenges in HIV Testing During the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) surface glycoproteins, including shared epitope motifs, sho...

Back to Top