Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Eric Voegelin's Contribution to Contemporary Political Theory
View through CrossRef
Some fifty years ago, Douglas Ainslie wrote of Benedetto Croce: “I can lay no claim to having discovered an America, but I do claim to have discovered a Columbus.” Eric Voegelin, today at the height of his career as a political philosopher, scarcely needs to be discovered; he is regarded as a Columbus in the realms of the spirit by many concerned with the the oretical analysis of politics. But in the political science profession he has been more often ignored or systematically misunderstood than read for what he has to teach. Among those according an indifferent or hostile reception to Voegelin are many who, bewailing the recent “decline” of political theory, might have been expected to welcome the appearance of a thinker meticulously pointing the way to the recovery of political theory as a tradition of inquiry. The basic reasons for this curious reception will be alluded to in the course of this essay. The major objective, however, is to isolate the key elements in Voegelin's political theory and to give some indication of his general position in contemporary political science. Hopefully, the result will be to further the understanding of his work and the appreciation of his achievement.
Title: Eric Voegelin's Contribution to Contemporary Political Theory
Description:
Some fifty years ago, Douglas Ainslie wrote of Benedetto Croce: “I can lay no claim to having discovered an America, but I do claim to have discovered a Columbus.
” Eric Voegelin, today at the height of his career as a political philosopher, scarcely needs to be discovered; he is regarded as a Columbus in the realms of the spirit by many concerned with the the oretical analysis of politics.
But in the political science profession he has been more often ignored or systematically misunderstood than read for what he has to teach.
Among those according an indifferent or hostile reception to Voegelin are many who, bewailing the recent “decline” of political theory, might have been expected to welcome the appearance of a thinker meticulously pointing the way to the recovery of political theory as a tradition of inquiry.
The basic reasons for this curious reception will be alluded to in the course of this essay.
The major objective, however, is to isolate the key elements in Voegelin's political theory and to give some indication of his general position in contemporary political science.
Hopefully, the result will be to further the understanding of his work and the appreciation of his achievement.
Related Results
What the Church Means by 'Faith'; What Eric Voegelin Meant by 'Faith'
What the Church Means by 'Faith'; What Eric Voegelin Meant by 'Faith'
In a familiar passage from the Gospel of St. Matthew, Jesus asks his disciples, “Who do people say that the Son of Man is?” They answered: “Some say John the Baptist, others say El...
DEBATING TOTALITARIANISM: AN EXCHANGE OF LETTERS BETWEEN HANNAH ARENDT AND ERIC VOEGELIN
DEBATING TOTALITARIANISM: AN EXCHANGE OF LETTERS BETWEEN HANNAH ARENDT AND ERIC VOEGELIN
ABSTRACTIn 1952, Waldemar Gurian, founding editor of The Review of Politics, commissioned Eric Voegelin, then a professor of political science at Louisiana State University, to rev...
Eric Voegelin and Representation
Eric Voegelin and Representation
Abstract
This chapter discusses the political theory of Eric Voegelin as the earliest example of anti-Schmittian political theology based on the rejection of soverei...
Revolt Against Modernity
Revolt Against Modernity
Eric Voegelin and Leo Strauss are two of the most provocative and durable political philosophers of this century. Ted McAllister's superbly written study provides the first compreh...
Hegel feiticeiro? Observações sobre a crítica de Eric Voegelin a Hegel
Hegel feiticeiro? Observações sobre a crítica de Eric Voegelin a Hegel
o presente texto visa reconstruir a interpretação de Eric Voegelin a respeito de Hegel, tomado como representante destacado da vertente gnóstica. De início, o texto procede à recon...
Political Culture in Kashmir: 1930–1990
Political Culture in Kashmir: 1930–1990
Summary
The 20th century, especially the post-1930s, represents a period of critical transformation in the Kashmir’s political landscape, marked by the rise of po...
Mazzinianesimo, fascismo, comunismo: l'itinerario politico di Delio Cantimori (1919-1943)
Mazzinianesimo, fascismo, comunismo: l'itinerario politico di Delio Cantimori (1919-1943)
Delio Cantimori (1904-1966) was one of the most important Italian historians of the twentieth century. His studies on sixteenth-century religious history, on Italian 'Jacobinism' a...
Ordre et temps. Eric Voegelin, Karl Löwith et la temporalité du politique
Ordre et temps. Eric Voegelin, Karl Löwith et la temporalité du politique
Dans le chapitre du Contrat social consacré à la mort du corps politique, Rousseau rappelle que cette mort est « la pente naturelle et inévitable des Gouvernements les mieux consti...

