Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Outcome of Gynecologic Cancer Patients With The Covid-19 Infection : A Systematic Review And Meta Analysis

View through CrossRef
Abstract Objective Cancer is comorbidity, which can lead to progressive worsening of Covid-19 with increased mortality. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis to get evidence of adverse outcomes of Covid-19 in gynecologic cancer. Methods Searches through PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and medRxiv to find articles on the outcome of gynecologic cancer with Covid-19 (24 July 2021-19 February 2022). Newcastle-Ottawa Scale tool used to evaluate the quality of included studies. Pooled odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI), random-effects model were presented. This study was registered to PROSPERO (CRD42021256557). Results We accepted 49 studies with (1994 gynecologic cancer with Covid-19). Covid-19 infection was lower in gynecologic cancer vs hematologic cancer (OR 0.71, CI 0.56–0.89, p 0.003). Severe Covid and death were lower in gynecologic cancer vs lung and hematologic cancer (OR 0.36, CI 0.16–0.80, p 0.01), (OR 0.26, CI 0.10–0.67 p 0.005), (OR 0.52, CI 0.43–0.63, p < 0.0001), (OR 0.65, CI 0.49–0.87, p 0.003) respectively. Increased Covid death is seen in gynecologic cancer vs breast, non-covid cancer, and non-cancer covid (OR 1.51, CI 1.20–1.90, p 0.0004), (OR 12.21, CI 8.39–17.77, p < 0.0001), (OR 3.06, CI 2.32–4.04, p < 0.0001) respectively. Conclusion Gynecologic cancer had increased Covid-19 adverse outcomes compared to non-cancer, breast cancer, non-metastatic, and Covid-19 negative population. Gynecologic cancer had lowered Covid-19 adverse outcomes compared to other cancer types, lung cancer, and hematologic cancer. Lack of age and comorbidities stratification due to limited data were limitations. These findings may aid health policies and services during the ongoing global pandemic.
Title: Outcome of Gynecologic Cancer Patients With The Covid-19 Infection : A Systematic Review And Meta Analysis
Description:
Abstract Objective Cancer is comorbidity, which can lead to progressive worsening of Covid-19 with increased mortality.
This is a systematic review and meta-analysis to get evidence of adverse outcomes of Covid-19 in gynecologic cancer.
Methods Searches through PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and medRxiv to find articles on the outcome of gynecologic cancer with Covid-19 (24 July 2021-19 February 2022).
Newcastle-Ottawa Scale tool used to evaluate the quality of included studies.
Pooled odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI), random-effects model were presented.
This study was registered to PROSPERO (CRD42021256557).
Results We accepted 49 studies with (1994 gynecologic cancer with Covid-19).
Covid-19 infection was lower in gynecologic cancer vs hematologic cancer (OR 0.
71, CI 0.
56–0.
89, p 0.
003).
Severe Covid and death were lower in gynecologic cancer vs lung and hematologic cancer (OR 0.
36, CI 0.
16–0.
80, p 0.
01), (OR 0.
26, CI 0.
10–0.
67 p 0.
005), (OR 0.
52, CI 0.
43–0.
63, p < 0.
0001), (OR 0.
65, CI 0.
49–0.
87, p 0.
003) respectively.
Increased Covid death is seen in gynecologic cancer vs breast, non-covid cancer, and non-cancer covid (OR 1.
51, CI 1.
20–1.
90, p 0.
0004), (OR 12.
21, CI 8.
39–17.
77, p < 0.
0001), (OR 3.
06, CI 2.
32–4.
04, p < 0.
0001) respectively.
Conclusion Gynecologic cancer had increased Covid-19 adverse outcomes compared to non-cancer, breast cancer, non-metastatic, and Covid-19 negative population.
Gynecologic cancer had lowered Covid-19 adverse outcomes compared to other cancer types, lung cancer, and hematologic cancer.
Lack of age and comorbidities stratification due to limited data were limitations.
These findings may aid health policies and services during the ongoing global pandemic.

Related Results

KECEMASAN SAAT PANDEMI COVID 19: LITERATUR REVIEW Hardiyati, Efri Widianti, Taty Hernawaty Departemen Keperawatan Jiwa Poltekkes Kemenkes Mamuju Sulbar, Universitas Pad...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
The outcome of gynecologic cancer patients with Covid-19 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
The outcome of gynecologic cancer patients with Covid-19 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background: Cancer is a comorbidity that leads to progressive worsening of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) with increased mortality. This is a systematic review and meta-analys...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activi...
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract Introduction Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...

Back to Top