Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Emancipation
View through CrossRef
Since the early nineteenth century, “emancipation” has been the catch phrase used to designate the release of Jews from an inferior political status through the acquisition of equal rights. The term is inherently ambiguous: “Emancipation” conflates the status and its attainment, and it assumes a single goal and process of achievement. Many historians identify “equal rights” narrowly with national citizenship in the modern state, failing to account for the diversity of Jewish experiences across Europe. Jews gained equality through myriad processes, in such polities as the city-state, nation-state, or nationalities-state; they attained citizenship by residence (jus soli) or by descent (jus sanguinis). Equality included such statuses as corporate parity, juridical equality, recognition as the “subject” of a ruler or state, and local or municipal citizenship. Moreover, equality came in various forms and was often partial and nowhere irrevocable: it could be and was lost and regained. Emancipation involved virtually every aspect of Jewish life: occupations, education, religion, and communal solidarity. It had its enthusiastic proponents, who saw it as the messianic end of diasporic Jewish inferiority, and antagonists, who saw it as a threat to the existence of Judaism or Jews. While emancipation has been studied as a local, municipal, regional, national, and continent-wide development, there is no established consensus about so basic an issue as chronology. Some scholars who employ a narrow definition of equality date the process from the creation of modern citizenship during the French Revolution (1790–1791) (Dubnow) or write of a “long century” of emancipation extending from the American and French Revolutions to the Russian Revolution (Birnbaum and Katznelson 1995, cited under Anthologies). Others see an earlier inception with the Enlightenment debates about the Jews’ political status (circa 1770) (Katz 1973, cited under General Overviews), or the Peace of Westphalia’s promulgation of a toleration (1648) that eventually spilled over to the Jews (Baron 1960, cited under General Overviews). Some see the conclusion of the process around 1870 with the unifications of Germany and Italy and the restructuring of the Austro-Hungarian Empire (Katz 1973, cited under General Overviews); others date the end to the equality of Jews in Russia (April 1917), the minority rights treaties in the East Central European successor states, such as Poland and Czechoslovakia (1921–1925), and autonomy in Birobizhan (1934) and the new Soviet Constitution (1936) (Mahler 1941, cited under Document Collections). This entry surveys four centuries of emancipation (1550 to 1950). While many historians have equated emancipation with the modern Jewish experience itself, this article treats emancipation exclusively as a legal and political process.
Title: Emancipation
Description:
Since the early nineteenth century, “emancipation” has been the catch phrase used to designate the release of Jews from an inferior political status through the acquisition of equal rights.
The term is inherently ambiguous: “Emancipation” conflates the status and its attainment, and it assumes a single goal and process of achievement.
Many historians identify “equal rights” narrowly with national citizenship in the modern state, failing to account for the diversity of Jewish experiences across Europe.
Jews gained equality through myriad processes, in such polities as the city-state, nation-state, or nationalities-state; they attained citizenship by residence (jus soli) or by descent (jus sanguinis).
Equality included such statuses as corporate parity, juridical equality, recognition as the “subject” of a ruler or state, and local or municipal citizenship.
Moreover, equality came in various forms and was often partial and nowhere irrevocable: it could be and was lost and regained.
Emancipation involved virtually every aspect of Jewish life: occupations, education, religion, and communal solidarity.
It had its enthusiastic proponents, who saw it as the messianic end of diasporic Jewish inferiority, and antagonists, who saw it as a threat to the existence of Judaism or Jews.
While emancipation has been studied as a local, municipal, regional, national, and continent-wide development, there is no established consensus about so basic an issue as chronology.
Some scholars who employ a narrow definition of equality date the process from the creation of modern citizenship during the French Revolution (1790–1791) (Dubnow) or write of a “long century” of emancipation extending from the American and French Revolutions to the Russian Revolution (Birnbaum and Katznelson 1995, cited under Anthologies).
Others see an earlier inception with the Enlightenment debates about the Jews’ political status (circa 1770) (Katz 1973, cited under General Overviews), or the Peace of Westphalia’s promulgation of a toleration (1648) that eventually spilled over to the Jews (Baron 1960, cited under General Overviews).
Some see the conclusion of the process around 1870 with the unifications of Germany and Italy and the restructuring of the Austro-Hungarian Empire (Katz 1973, cited under General Overviews); others date the end to the equality of Jews in Russia (April 1917), the minority rights treaties in the East Central European successor states, such as Poland and Czechoslovakia (1921–1925), and autonomy in Birobizhan (1934) and the new Soviet Constitution (1936) (Mahler 1941, cited under Document Collections).
This entry surveys four centuries of emancipation (1550 to 1950).
While many historians have equated emancipation with the modern Jewish experience itself, this article treats emancipation exclusively as a legal and political process.
Related Results
Emancipation
Emancipation
The process of emancipation in the Atlantic world spanned most of the 19th century and took a variety of forms. Some, such as Haiti’s 1804 declaration of immediate emancipation and...
Emerson and Caribbean Emancipation
Emerson and Caribbean Emancipation
Abstract
This essay reassesses Emerson’s “Address on the Anniversary of the Emancipation of the Negroes in the British West Indies,” with an emphasis on the staggere...
Canboulay and the Negre Jardin
Canboulay and the Negre Jardin
Coming to terms with Trinidadian Carnival means dealing not only with its current manifestations but also with its often fraught history linked to imperialism and enslavement. A Ca...
Women of Mark
Women of Mark
This chapter introduces the reader to the lives and art of Mary Edmonia Lewis and Meta Warrick Fuller, and their emancipation sculptures Forever Free and Emancipation. As highly ac...
Fraser on Emancipation as a Political Process and Institutional Form
Fraser on Emancipation as a Political Process and Institutional Form
The chapter synthesizes the previously analyzed aspects of Fraser’s approach to emancipation, emphasizing the interplay between normative ideals and political strategies. Fraser’s ...
The Limits of Emancipationist Memory in Richmond
The Limits of Emancipationist Memory in Richmond
This chapters explores Black Richmonders’ attempts to define the memory of emancipation in the city, state, region, and nation. Three Emancipation celebrations offer a window onto ...
Crowther, Samuel Ajayi
Crowther, Samuel Ajayi
The case for narrating the history of slavery and emancipation through the biography of enslaved Africans is strongly supported by the life and experiences of Samuel Ajayi Crowther...
The Ideological Emancipation of Chinese Women and Its Idealistic Pursuit in the May 4th Movement
The Ideological Emancipation of Chinese Women and Its Idealistic Pursuit in the May 4th Movement
The May 4th Movement of 1919 is a significant period of ideological change in Chinese modern history, and in it is during this time that the ideological enlightenment of modern Chi...


