Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Impact of fat and protein on postprandial glycemia in gestational diabetes: A randomized pilot crossover trial

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background The first‐line treatment for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is dietary modification, but there is little evidence on the impact of fat and protein on glycemia in pregnancy. Objective To examine the effect of fat and protein on postprandial glycemia in individuals with GDM and to determine if this response differed in GDM characterized by insulin resistance versus insulin deficiency. Methods We conducted a double‐blind randomized crossover pilot study using test meals with similar caloric (390–411 kcal) and carbohydrate content (45%), but with either high‐fat (41%) or high‐protein (35%) content in diet‐controlled GDM ( N =  16). We used fasting glucose and insulin levels to classify participants as insulin‐resistant or insulin‐deficient GDM. The primary outcome was peak postprandial glucose within 3 h following the test meals measured by a continuous glucose monitor (CGM). Secondary outcomes included glucose area under the curve (AUC) and glycemic excursion (peak postprandial glucose minus pre‐meal glucose). We used t ‐tests to evaluate the relationship between meal type and outcomes. Results The high‐fat meal resulted in a higher mean (standard deviation [SD]) peak postprandial glucose (146.4 [19.7] mg/dL) than the high‐protein meal (137.2 [21.1] mg/dL, p  = 0.03) (mean difference, 9.2 [15.9] mg/dL; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78, 148.4). The glucose AUC (high fat: 26,236 [3220] mg/dL*min, high protein: 24,788 [3567] mg/dL*min, p  = 0.03) (mean difference, 1448 [2462] mg/dL*min; 95% CI, 136.0, 2760) and the glycemic excursion (high fat: 68.3 [23.3] mg/dL, high protein: 59.7 [22.3] mg/dL, p  = 0.03) (mean difference, 8.6 [14.9] mg/dL; 95% CI, 0.7, 16.5) were higher after the high‐fat meal. There was no differential peak postprandial glucose response to high‐fat versus high‐protein in insulin‐deficient versus insulin‐resistant GDM (mean difference, −0.25 mg/dL; 95% CI, −24.1, 23.5, p  = 0.98). Conclusion In GDM, a high‐protein meal leads to lower CGM‐measured postprandial glucose compared to a high‐fat meal, when calories and carbohydrate content are held constant. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04187521
Title: Impact of fat and protein on postprandial glycemia in gestational diabetes: A randomized pilot crossover trial
Description:
Abstract Background The first‐line treatment for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is dietary modification, but there is little evidence on the impact of fat and protein on glycemia in pregnancy.
Objective To examine the effect of fat and protein on postprandial glycemia in individuals with GDM and to determine if this response differed in GDM characterized by insulin resistance versus insulin deficiency.
Methods We conducted a double‐blind randomized crossover pilot study using test meals with similar caloric (390–411 kcal) and carbohydrate content (45%), but with either high‐fat (41%) or high‐protein (35%) content in diet‐controlled GDM ( N =  16).
We used fasting glucose and insulin levels to classify participants as insulin‐resistant or insulin‐deficient GDM.
The primary outcome was peak postprandial glucose within 3 h following the test meals measured by a continuous glucose monitor (CGM).
Secondary outcomes included glucose area under the curve (AUC) and glycemic excursion (peak postprandial glucose minus pre‐meal glucose).
We used t ‐tests to evaluate the relationship between meal type and outcomes.
Results The high‐fat meal resulted in a higher mean (standard deviation [SD]) peak postprandial glucose (146.
4 [19.
7] mg/dL) than the high‐protein meal (137.
2 [21.
1] mg/dL, p  = 0.
03) (mean difference, 9.
2 [15.
9] mg/dL; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.
78, 148.
4).
The glucose AUC (high fat: 26,236 [3220] mg/dL*min, high protein: 24,788 [3567] mg/dL*min, p  = 0.
03) (mean difference, 1448 [2462] mg/dL*min; 95% CI, 136.
0, 2760) and the glycemic excursion (high fat: 68.
3 [23.
3] mg/dL, high protein: 59.
7 [22.
3] mg/dL, p  = 0.
03) (mean difference, 8.
6 [14.
9] mg/dL; 95% CI, 0.
7, 16.
5) were higher after the high‐fat meal.
There was no differential peak postprandial glucose response to high‐fat versus high‐protein in insulin‐deficient versus insulin‐resistant GDM (mean difference, −0.
25 mg/dL; 95% CI, −24.
1, 23.
5, p  = 0.
98).
Conclusion In GDM, a high‐protein meal leads to lower CGM‐measured postprandial glucose compared to a high‐fat meal, when calories and carbohydrate content are held constant.
Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.
gov identifier: NCT04187521.

Related Results

Fat
Fat
Fat is, according to Deborah Lupton, a cultural artefact: a bodily substance or body shape that is given meaning by complex and shifting systems of ideas, practices, emotions, m...
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: Although traumatic chylothorax is predominantly associated with penetrating injuries, instances following blunt trauma, as a rare and challenging condition, ...
Crossover Phenomena in Motor Evoked Potentials During Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring of Cranial Surgeries
Crossover Phenomena in Motor Evoked Potentials During Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring of Cranial Surgeries
Purpose: Transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) are used to assess the corticospinal tract during surgery. Transcranial motor evoked potentials are elicited by p...
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract Introduction Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
[RETRACTED] TruuBurn Keto Max Reviews | Tried dieting but not seen the Results You Desire! Try - TruuBurn Keto Max v1
[RETRACTED] TruuBurn Keto Max Reviews | Tried dieting but not seen the Results You Desire! Try - TruuBurn Keto Max v1
[RETRACTED]TruuBurn Keto Max Reviews: Does Truu Burn Keto Advanced Diet Pills Work? TruuBurn Keto Max is an Advanced Keto diet pill that enables you to lose weight within a short...
[RETRACTED] Keto Extreme Fat Burner Tim Noakes v1
[RETRACTED] Keto Extreme Fat Burner Tim Noakes v1
[RETRACTED]Keto Extreme Fat Burner Denmark: Getting the perfect shape for the body is very important these days. The health and fitness of the body are directly connected to the sh...
[RETRACTED] Keto Extreme Fat Burner Tim Noakes v1
[RETRACTED] Keto Extreme Fat Burner Tim Noakes v1
[RETRACTED]Keto Extreme Fat Burner Denmark: Getting the perfect shape for the body is very important these days. The health and fitness of the body are directly connected to the sh...
7 th International Symposium on Enabling Technologies for Life Sciences (ETP)
7 th International Symposium on Enabling Technologies for Life Sciences (ETP)
The seventh in the series of ETP Symposia (see Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 2012, 26 , ...

Back to Top