Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

License to Hack

View through CrossRef
Legal hackathons are exploding in popularity. “Hacking” is a term often associated with illegal behavior but a hackathon is something different. At a hackathon, lawyers, technologists, data scientists, public interest organizations, law students, and just about anyone who is interested converge in a friendly, time-pressured competition aimed at solving some defined problem. For more than a decade, different industries have looked to hackathons as a source of new ideas. Today, the legal industry uses hackathons to spark creation of innovative tools to chip away at the access to justice crisis and improve the delivery of legal services. <br><br>But often lost in the excitement is a key piece to hackathon success: treatment of the intellectual property. For example, who owns the copyright in software created at a hackathon? What about a new business method? What about the rights to trademark a new design? Most hackathons have some form of a participant agreement, but many outright ignore the “who owns it” question or fail to address it in a careful manner. This is a problem in need of a solution – or at least some concrete guidance. <br><br>This Article explores intellectual property rights in the context of legal hackathons. How intellectual property is approached at the start can impact the success (or not) of creations at the end. Taking rights away from participants risks alienating them and interfering with the collaborative, fun spirit most hackathons embody. Yet giving participants all the marbles may not be preferable either, especially if it disincentivizes organizers to support future development and help a tool survive beyond the hackathon doors. In circumstances where one size doesn’t fit all, this Article discusses pros and cons of varying approaches to intellectual property in hackathon participant agreements. Embodying the hackathon resolve to create something tangible and useful for others, the Article connects readers to an online repository of sample agreements as well as a participant agreement template.
Elsevier BV
Title: License to Hack
Description:
Legal hackathons are exploding in popularity.
“Hacking” is a term often associated with illegal behavior but a hackathon is something different.
At a hackathon, lawyers, technologists, data scientists, public interest organizations, law students, and just about anyone who is interested converge in a friendly, time-pressured competition aimed at solving some defined problem.
For more than a decade, different industries have looked to hackathons as a source of new ideas.
Today, the legal industry uses hackathons to spark creation of innovative tools to chip away at the access to justice crisis and improve the delivery of legal services.
<br><br>But often lost in the excitement is a key piece to hackathon success: treatment of the intellectual property.
For example, who owns the copyright in software created at a hackathon? What about a new business method? What about the rights to trademark a new design? Most hackathons have some form of a participant agreement, but many outright ignore the “who owns it” question or fail to address it in a careful manner.
This is a problem in need of a solution – or at least some concrete guidance.
<br><br>This Article explores intellectual property rights in the context of legal hackathons.
How intellectual property is approached at the start can impact the success (or not) of creations at the end.
Taking rights away from participants risks alienating them and interfering with the collaborative, fun spirit most hackathons embody.
Yet giving participants all the marbles may not be preferable either, especially if it disincentivizes organizers to support future development and help a tool survive beyond the hackathon doors.
In circumstances where one size doesn’t fit all, this Article discusses pros and cons of varying approaches to intellectual property in hackathon participant agreements.
Embodying the hackathon resolve to create something tangible and useful for others, the Article connects readers to an online repository of sample agreements as well as a participant agreement template.

Related Results

UPAYA SATLANTAS POLRESTA PALANGKA RAYA DALAM MENCEGAH PEMALSUAN USIA OLEH PEMOHON PENERBITAN SIM C
UPAYA SATLANTAS POLRESTA PALANGKA RAYA DALAM MENCEGAH PEMALSUAN USIA OLEH PEMOHON PENERBITAN SIM C
To be able to have a driver's license for drivers of various types of vehicles must meet the conditions that have been set.  Similarly, with driver's license C, one of the conditio...
Legal protection against licence plate businesses that produce licence plates for stolen vehicles
Legal protection against licence plate businesses that produce licence plates for stolen vehicles
Vehicle license plate numbers include a unique identity that distinguishes one vehicle from another. Many modify vehicle license plates because of their ordinary shape, because of ...
The Cory Arcangel Hack
The Cory Arcangel Hack
The first in-depth exploration of the work of artist Cory Arcangel, a pioneer of DIY-new media art whose influential “hacks” subvert the confines of Big Tech. Cor...
Detecting Similarity License Plate Vehicle License Via Using Deep CNNs in Complex Surroundings
Detecting Similarity License Plate Vehicle License Via Using Deep CNNs in Complex Surroundings
As our society has developed, cars on the road have increased. Manual license plate recognition is challenging since it is significantly slower in real-time than when performed by ...
The Jurisdictional Implications on Default of the Parties to Trademark License Agreements Made before a Notary
The Jurisdictional Implications on Default of the Parties to Trademark License Agreements Made before a Notary
This study aims to identify and analyze the juridical implications of the parties' default in the trademark license agreement made before a notary, to identify and analyze the lega...
A Comparative Study on Detection and Recognition of Nonuniform License Plates
A Comparative Study on Detection and Recognition of Nonuniform License Plates
This paper presents a comparative study on license plate detection and recognition algorithms in unconstrained environments, which include varying illuminations, nonstandard plate ...
The Effectiveness of Smart Application of Integrated Licensing Services for the Public (SICANTIK) on Community Services in Gianyar Regency
The Effectiveness of Smart Application of Integrated Licensing Services for the Public (SICANTIK) on Community Services in Gianyar Regency
Technological advances drive development and change in various sectors of life, including the government sector. In this case, the government sector began intensively developing IC...
Enhancing Automated Vehicle License Plate Recognition with YOLOv8 and EasyOCR
Enhancing Automated Vehicle License Plate Recognition with YOLOv8 and EasyOCR
This research focuses on the development of an automatic system for vehicle license plate recognition using YOLOv8, EasyOCR, and CNN methods for object classification. The main iss...

Back to Top