Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Abstract 1418: Identification of recurrent regulatory mutations in breast cancer
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Since the identification of recurrent TERT promoter mutations in melanoma resulting in increased TERT expression, there has been increased interest in identifying recurrent regulatory non-coding mutations (Horn et al. 2013, Huang et al. 2013). Several studies have attempted pan-cancer analyses in order to identify these types of mutations, but often the results suffer from low coverage of regulatory regions or do not extend to breast cancer. While some breast cancer specific studies have identified some significantly mutated promoters and lncRNAs, they have often failed to incorporate transcriptome data to assess the impact and relevance of mutations on the expression of genes within tumors (Nik-Zainal et al. 2016). In order to address this, we assembled and generated a data set consisting of 458 breast cancer cases with matched tumor/normal pairs. This cohort consists of 22.4% luminal A, 19% luminal B, 16.4% HER2-enriched, 21% basal-like, 0.8% normal-like, and 20.4% unknown with regards to molecular subtype. This is important due to different breast cancer subtypes having dissimilar phenotypes and varying rates of gene coding mutations. This data set has a mix of whole genome, exome, transcriptome, and custom capture sequencing. We designed a custom capture reagent that covers regions assembled from regulatory databases, 5' untranslated regions, 500 bases upstream and downstream of transcription start sites, and 50,000 bases upstream and downstream of 178 genes that have been implicated as being important in breast cancer (Lesurf et al. 2016). While this custom capture region is similar in size to an exome, it has advantages over whole genome and exome sequencing, particularly with respect to coverage in GC-rich promoter regions. With these data, we predict that we will be able to identify novel, regulatory coding and non-coding drivers of breast cancer that would not be discovered without integrated analysis of the DNA- and RNA-seq data for each tumor. Instrument data were processed using the McDonnell Genome Institute somatic variant calling pipeline that includes 5 SNV callers and 3 indel callers. We then used these steps to filter variants: min. 20x coverage in both the tumor and normal sample, min. 2.5% tumor variant allele frequency, min. 3 variant supporting reads in the tumor sample, max. 10% variant allele frequency in the normal sample. We also filtered against gnomAD and a panel of normals. Rheinbay et al. 2017 identified recurrently mutated promoter regions for nine genes: TBC1D12, ZNF143, ALDOA, NEAT1, RMRP, CITED2, FOXA1, CTNNB1, LEPROTL1. Our preliminary analysis has revealed that we also see mutations within these regions. We plan to present on the significance of mutations within these previously seen regions, based on recurrence and transcriptome changes, as well as novel recurrent regulatory regions that our analysis reveals, particularly with respect to molecular subtype.
Citation Format: Kelsy C. Cotto, Arpad Danos, Robert Lesurf, Morag Park, Malachi Griffith, Obi L. Griffith. Identification of recurrent regulatory mutations in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1418.
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Title: Abstract 1418: Identification of recurrent regulatory mutations in breast cancer
Description:
Abstract
Since the identification of recurrent TERT promoter mutations in melanoma resulting in increased TERT expression, there has been increased interest in identifying recurrent regulatory non-coding mutations (Horn et al.
2013, Huang et al.
2013).
Several studies have attempted pan-cancer analyses in order to identify these types of mutations, but often the results suffer from low coverage of regulatory regions or do not extend to breast cancer.
While some breast cancer specific studies have identified some significantly mutated promoters and lncRNAs, they have often failed to incorporate transcriptome data to assess the impact and relevance of mutations on the expression of genes within tumors (Nik-Zainal et al.
2016).
In order to address this, we assembled and generated a data set consisting of 458 breast cancer cases with matched tumor/normal pairs.
This cohort consists of 22.
4% luminal A, 19% luminal B, 16.
4% HER2-enriched, 21% basal-like, 0.
8% normal-like, and 20.
4% unknown with regards to molecular subtype.
This is important due to different breast cancer subtypes having dissimilar phenotypes and varying rates of gene coding mutations.
This data set has a mix of whole genome, exome, transcriptome, and custom capture sequencing.
We designed a custom capture reagent that covers regions assembled from regulatory databases, 5' untranslated regions, 500 bases upstream and downstream of transcription start sites, and 50,000 bases upstream and downstream of 178 genes that have been implicated as being important in breast cancer (Lesurf et al.
2016).
While this custom capture region is similar in size to an exome, it has advantages over whole genome and exome sequencing, particularly with respect to coverage in GC-rich promoter regions.
With these data, we predict that we will be able to identify novel, regulatory coding and non-coding drivers of breast cancer that would not be discovered without integrated analysis of the DNA- and RNA-seq data for each tumor.
Instrument data were processed using the McDonnell Genome Institute somatic variant calling pipeline that includes 5 SNV callers and 3 indel callers.
We then used these steps to filter variants: min.
20x coverage in both the tumor and normal sample, min.
2.
5% tumor variant allele frequency, min.
3 variant supporting reads in the tumor sample, max.
10% variant allele frequency in the normal sample.
We also filtered against gnomAD and a panel of normals.
Rheinbay et al.
2017 identified recurrently mutated promoter regions for nine genes: TBC1D12, ZNF143, ALDOA, NEAT1, RMRP, CITED2, FOXA1, CTNNB1, LEPROTL1.
Our preliminary analysis has revealed that we also see mutations within these regions.
We plan to present on the significance of mutations within these previously seen regions, based on recurrence and transcriptome changes, as well as novel recurrent regulatory regions that our analysis reveals, particularly with respect to molecular subtype.
Citation Format: Kelsy C.
Cotto, Arpad Danos, Robert Lesurf, Morag Park, Malachi Griffith, Obi L.
Griffith.
Identification of recurrent regulatory mutations in breast cancer [abstract].
In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL.
Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1418.
Related Results
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis of The Breast: A Case Series
Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis of The Breast: A Case Series
Abstract
IntroductionDesmoid-type fibromatosis (DTF), also called aggressive fibromatosis, is a rare, benign, locally aggressive condition. Mammary DTF originates from fibroblasts ...
Abstract OI-1: OI-1 Decoding breast cancer predisposition genes
Abstract OI-1: OI-1 Decoding breast cancer predisposition genes
Abstract
Women with one or more first-degree female relatives with a history of breast cancer have a two-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer. This risk i...
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM). Clinical trials...
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract
A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
The impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on surgical decision-making in young patients with breast cancer.
The impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on surgical decision-making in young patients with breast cancer.
Abstract
Abstract #4012
Recent data suggests that breast MRI is a more sensitive diagnostic test for detecting invasive breast cancer than mammography...

