Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Codesign methods when developing a decision guide for eating and drinking problems among hospital patients with severe dementia
View through CrossRef
AbstractBackgroundDecisions about eating and drinking for people with severe dementia in acute hospitals are often difficult. Using a codesign process, we developed a decision guide for family carers and hospital professionals to help everyone making these decisions.MethodWe conducted a systematic review and qualitative interviews with people with mild dementia, family carers and hospital professionals in the UK. We ran four online workshops with family carers and hospital professionals to codesign the decision guide. In parallel with the codesign workshops, a matrix approach was used to synthesise data from all studies, including the workshop data, and to develop a prototype of the decision guide. We refined the prototype through workshops and discussions among the research team and lay people. User testing evaluated the prototype, which finalised the decision guide.ResultMost participants were aware of the limited benefits of artificial nutrition and hydration for people with severe dementia. However, participants often found conversations and decision‐making processes confusing and fragmented in hospitals. The codesign process highlighted the importance of meeting individuals’ needs and preferences. The decision guide aimed not only to help people reach evidence‐based decisions but also to support conversations and decision‐making processes. It was designed to clarify the decision‐making process, provide necessary information about eating and drinking interventions, and elicit the values/preferences of everyone involved. It emphasises person‐centred care, best‐interests decision‐making, and multidisciplinary team approaches. From the user‐testing, family carers and hospital professionals perceived the decision guide to be useful in starting conversations and helping with the decision‐making processes. The final version of the decision guide was widely disseminated and is being used in clinical practice.ConclusionThe codesigned decision guide may facilitate conversations between family carers and hospital professionals and help them reach shared decisions that meet the needs and preferences of people with severe dementia. Further evaluation research of the decision guide is required to test its real‐world impacts.
Title: Codesign methods when developing a decision guide for eating and drinking problems among hospital patients with severe dementia
Description:
AbstractBackgroundDecisions about eating and drinking for people with severe dementia in acute hospitals are often difficult.
Using a codesign process, we developed a decision guide for family carers and hospital professionals to help everyone making these decisions.
MethodWe conducted a systematic review and qualitative interviews with people with mild dementia, family carers and hospital professionals in the UK.
We ran four online workshops with family carers and hospital professionals to codesign the decision guide.
In parallel with the codesign workshops, a matrix approach was used to synthesise data from all studies, including the workshop data, and to develop a prototype of the decision guide.
We refined the prototype through workshops and discussions among the research team and lay people.
User testing evaluated the prototype, which finalised the decision guide.
ResultMost participants were aware of the limited benefits of artificial nutrition and hydration for people with severe dementia.
However, participants often found conversations and decision‐making processes confusing and fragmented in hospitals.
The codesign process highlighted the importance of meeting individuals’ needs and preferences.
The decision guide aimed not only to help people reach evidence‐based decisions but also to support conversations and decision‐making processes.
It was designed to clarify the decision‐making process, provide necessary information about eating and drinking interventions, and elicit the values/preferences of everyone involved.
It emphasises person‐centred care, best‐interests decision‐making, and multidisciplinary team approaches.
From the user‐testing, family carers and hospital professionals perceived the decision guide to be useful in starting conversations and helping with the decision‐making processes.
The final version of the decision guide was widely disseminated and is being used in clinical practice.
ConclusionThe codesigned decision guide may facilitate conversations between family carers and hospital professionals and help them reach shared decisions that meet the needs and preferences of people with severe dementia.
Further evaluation research of the decision guide is required to test its real‐world impacts.
Related Results
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Co‐design development of a decision guide on eating and drinking for people with severe dementia during acute hospital admissions
Co‐design development of a decision guide on eating and drinking for people with severe dementia during acute hospital admissions
AbstractIntroductionUsing co‐design processes, we aimed to develop an evidence‐based decision guide for family carers and hospital professionals to support decision‐making about ea...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract
Introduction
Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Double Burden of Nutrition and some Eating Habits Characteristics of Preschool Children in Nam Hong Commune, Dong Anh district, Hanoi, 2018
Double Burden of Nutrition and some Eating Habits Characteristics of Preschool Children in Nam Hong Commune, Dong Anh district, Hanoi, 2018
Abstract: The study aims to provide evidence of double nutritional burden (including malnutrition and overweight/obesity) as well as the impact of eating habits on nutritional stat...
Perspectives on AI Architectures and Codesign for Earth System Predictability
Perspectives on AI Architectures and Codesign for Earth System Predictability
Abstract
Recently, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research (BER), and Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR) programs o...
Prescription Patterns of Anti-dementia and Psychotropic Drugs in People Living With Dementia in China
Prescription Patterns of Anti-dementia and Psychotropic Drugs in People Living With Dementia in China
Abstract
Pharmacotherapy of dementia is a critical intervention for managing symptoms of and slowing progression of dementia. However, evidence on prescribing patter...
Exploring the relationship between premenstrual dysphoric disorder and disordered eating: a qualitative study
Exploring the relationship between premenstrual dysphoric disorder and disordered eating: a qualitative study
Abstract
Background
Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) causes debilitating psychological and physical symptoms during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Previous...
Walking pace, handgrip strength, age, APOE genotypes, and new-onset dementia: the UK Biobank prospective cohort study
Walking pace, handgrip strength, age, APOE genotypes, and new-onset dementia: the UK Biobank prospective cohort study
Abstract
Background
The independent and additive associations of walking pace and grip strength on dementia risk and the potential modifying effects...

