Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Conceptualizing centers of excellence: A global evidence

View through CrossRef
Abstract Objective Globally, interest in excellence has grown exponentially, with public and private institutions shifting their attention from meet targets to achieving excellence. Centers of Excellence (CoEs) are standing at the forefront of healthcare, research, and innovations responding to the world’s most complex problems. However, their potential is hindered by conceptual ambiguity. We conducted a global synthesis of the evidence to conceptualize CoEs. Design Scoping review, following Arksey and O’Malley’s framework and methodological enhancement by Levac et al to analyze the evidence and the PRISMA-ScR to guide the retrieval and inclusion of the evidence. Data sources PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and the Google engine from their inception to 01 January 2021. Eligibility Papers that describe CoE as the main theme, which could be defining, theorizing, implementing, or evaluating a CoE. Results The search resulted in 52,161 potential publications, with 78 articles met the eligibility criteria. The 78 articles were from 33 countries, of which 35 were from the United States of America, 3 each from Nigeria, South Africa, Spain, and India, and 2 each from Ethiopia, Canada, Russia, Colombia, Sweden, Greece, and Peru. The rest 17 were from various countries. The articles involved six thematic areas - healthcare, education, research, industry, information technology, and general concepts on CoE. The analysis documented success stories of using the brand “Center of Excellence” - an influential brand to stimulate technical skills, innovation, and technology. We identified 12 essential foundations of CoE - specialized expertise; infrastructure; innovation; high-impact research; quality service; accreditation or standards; leadership; organizational structure; strategy; collaboration and partnership; sustainable funding or financial mechanisms; and entrepreneurship. Conclusions CoEs have significant scientific, political, economic, and social impacts. A comprehensive framework is needed to guide and inspire an institution as a CoE and to help government and funding institutions shape and oversee CoEs. Strengths and limitations of this study - To the best of our knowledge, this is the first scoping review to conceptualize centers of excellence based on global evidence. - The study followed Arksey and O’Malley’s framework and methodological enhancement by Levac et al to and the PRISMA-ScR methodological frameworks. - Five databases were systematically searched to identify scientific and gray literature - The study was limited by language restrictions.
Title: Conceptualizing centers of excellence: A global evidence
Description:
Abstract Objective Globally, interest in excellence has grown exponentially, with public and private institutions shifting their attention from meet targets to achieving excellence.
Centers of Excellence (CoEs) are standing at the forefront of healthcare, research, and innovations responding to the world’s most complex problems.
However, their potential is hindered by conceptual ambiguity.
We conducted a global synthesis of the evidence to conceptualize CoEs.
Design Scoping review, following Arksey and O’Malley’s framework and methodological enhancement by Levac et al to analyze the evidence and the PRISMA-ScR to guide the retrieval and inclusion of the evidence.
Data sources PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and the Google engine from their inception to 01 January 2021.
Eligibility Papers that describe CoE as the main theme, which could be defining, theorizing, implementing, or evaluating a CoE.
Results The search resulted in 52,161 potential publications, with 78 articles met the eligibility criteria.
The 78 articles were from 33 countries, of which 35 were from the United States of America, 3 each from Nigeria, South Africa, Spain, and India, and 2 each from Ethiopia, Canada, Russia, Colombia, Sweden, Greece, and Peru.
The rest 17 were from various countries.
The articles involved six thematic areas - healthcare, education, research, industry, information technology, and general concepts on CoE.
The analysis documented success stories of using the brand “Center of Excellence” - an influential brand to stimulate technical skills, innovation, and technology.
We identified 12 essential foundations of CoE - specialized expertise; infrastructure; innovation; high-impact research; quality service; accreditation or standards; leadership; organizational structure; strategy; collaboration and partnership; sustainable funding or financial mechanisms; and entrepreneurship.
Conclusions CoEs have significant scientific, political, economic, and social impacts.
A comprehensive framework is needed to guide and inspire an institution as a CoE and to help government and funding institutions shape and oversee CoEs.
Strengths and limitations of this study - To the best of our knowledge, this is the first scoping review to conceptualize centers of excellence based on global evidence.
- The study followed Arksey and O’Malley’s framework and methodological enhancement by Levac et al to and the PRISMA-ScR methodological frameworks.
- Five databases were systematically searched to identify scientific and gray literature - The study was limited by language restrictions.

Related Results

The Burden of Road Traffic Injuries: A Global Perspective
The Burden of Road Traffic Injuries: A Global Perspective
Introduction     Road Traffic Injury (RTI) pose a significant health challenge. It represents the eighth leading cause of death globally, prompting the UN to designate 2011-2020 as...
Exemplar Case Studies: Nursing & Midwifery Excellence in the Midlands
Exemplar Case Studies: Nursing & Midwifery Excellence in the Midlands
We are proud to be working in partnership with the National CNO Policy and Strategy Unit at NHS England to support national Excellence ambitions, establishing a collective leadersh...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activi...
Total business excellence – a new management model for operationalizing excellence
Total business excellence – a new management model for operationalizing excellence
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to identify and address the underlying causes of costly quality/ethical problems that have prevented companies to achieve and...
Perspectives on the educational system in a global context
Perspectives on the educational system in a global context
Relevance of the topic: The evolving landscape of higher education necessitates a comprehensive exploration of global perspectives in teaching excellence frameworks and contemporar...
Excellence – 25 years evolution
Excellence – 25 years evolution
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present and discuss/reflect on some well‐known excellence frameworks or models in order to understand the development in...

Back to Top