Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Phase I Study Of P-Glycoprotein (P-gp) Mediated Drug Interactions Between Lenalidomide (LEN) and Quinidine Or Temsirolimus

View through CrossRef
Abstract Introduction Lenalidomide (LEN) is a weak substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in vitro and renal excretion of LEN is the primary elimination route following oral administration.  A P-gp inhibitor may have the potential to increase systemic exposure to LEN by reducing renal elimination at the tubular level and enhancing oral absorption at the gut level. Recently, a single uncontrolled phase 1 study (Hofmeister, 2011) and a case report (Takahashi, 2012) described that plasma exposure to LEN and temsirolimus was increased in multiple myeloma patients when lenalidomide was co-administered with a P-gp inhibitor (temsirolimus and intraconazole, respectively).  This clinical study assessed LEN-drug interactions via P-gp using two probe drugs under controlled conditions.  Quinidine, a P-gp inhibitor with high in vivo inhibition potential and proven effect on plasma exposure of the prototype P-gp substrate digoxin in humans, was used to maximize the likelihood of detecting drug-drug interactions via P-gp.  Temsirolimus, a P-gp inhibitor/substrate, was used to evaluate P-gp mediated interactions on either drug in comparison with the results reported in literature. Methods This was a phase 1, single-center, open-label, 2-part, fixed-sequence crossover study conducted in healthy men. Part 1 comprised of 2 treatment periods with LEN alone (25 mg single dose on Day 1) in period 1, followed by LEN (on Day 4) plus quinidine (300 mg twice daily [BID] on Day 1 and 600 mg BID on Days 2–5) in period 2.  Part 2 consisted of three treatment periods with LEN (25 mg single dose on Day 1) alone in period 1, temsirolimus (25 mg single dose intravenously [IV] on Day 1) alone in period 2, and LEN plus temsirolimus in period 3 (Day 1).  Treatment periods were separated by a washout of 7–10 days. Serial samples were collected to determine the plasma, whole blood or urine concentrations of LEN, quinidine, and temsirolimus (and its active metabolite, sirolimus [also a P-gp inhibitor/substrate]).  Safety was monitored throughout the study. Results A total of 31 healthy men, aged 22 to 62 years; were enrolled (14 in Part 1 and 17 in Part 2). Renal excretion of LEN was almost complete at 12 h post dose for all treatments (Figure 1). In the absence or presence of a P-gp inhibitor, the mean percentage LEN dose excreted in the urine (74% vs 70% in Part 1, respectively; 81% vs 80% in Part 2) and renal clearance (227 vs 245 mL/min in Part 1; 251 vs 229 mL/min in Part 2) were similar, demonstrating that the rate and capacity of LEN renal excretion were not reduced by P-gp inhibition. Both the median time (1 h) to reach the maximum concentration (Cmax) and the oral bioavailability (70–80% of the administrated dose, as indicated by the renal excretion of unchanged drug) of LEN, were comparable in the absence or presence of a P-gp inhibitor (0.5–1 h and 74–81% of the dose, respectively); therefore, the rate and extent of LEN oral absorption were also not altered by P-gp inhibition. Consequently, there was no significant change in the plasma exposure to LEN in the presence of a P-gp inhibitor (Figure 1). The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratio of geometric means between LEN alone and LEN plus a P-gp inhibitor were completely contained within the equivalence limits of 80–125% for Cmaxand area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of LEN. In addition, LEN had no effect on blood exposure to temsirolimus and sirolimus, with the 90% CIs for the ratio of their geometric mean Cmax and AUC between temsirolimus alone and temsirolimus plus LEN between 80–125%. No significant safety findings were reported when LEN was given with quinidine or temsirolimus compared to LEN alone. Conclusions Co-administration of either the P-gp inhibitor quinidine or temsirolimus had no clinically relevant effect on the systemic exposure of LEN.  Similarly, co-administration of LEN had no clinically relevant effect on the systemic exposure of the P-gp substrates temsirolimus and sirolimus.  A single dose of LEN was well tolerated when co-administered with quinidine or temsirolimus in healthy men. Disclosures: Chen: Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weiss:Celegene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Reyes:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Liu:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kasserra:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wang:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhou:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kumar:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weiss:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Palmisano:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership.
Title: Phase I Study Of P-Glycoprotein (P-gp) Mediated Drug Interactions Between Lenalidomide (LEN) and Quinidine Or Temsirolimus
Description:
Abstract Introduction Lenalidomide (LEN) is a weak substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in vitro and renal excretion of LEN is the primary elimination route following oral administration.
  A P-gp inhibitor may have the potential to increase systemic exposure to LEN by reducing renal elimination at the tubular level and enhancing oral absorption at the gut level.
Recently, a single uncontrolled phase 1 study (Hofmeister, 2011) and a case report (Takahashi, 2012) described that plasma exposure to LEN and temsirolimus was increased in multiple myeloma patients when lenalidomide was co-administered with a P-gp inhibitor (temsirolimus and intraconazole, respectively).
  This clinical study assessed LEN-drug interactions via P-gp using two probe drugs under controlled conditions.
  Quinidine, a P-gp inhibitor with high in vivo inhibition potential and proven effect on plasma exposure of the prototype P-gp substrate digoxin in humans, was used to maximize the likelihood of detecting drug-drug interactions via P-gp.
  Temsirolimus, a P-gp inhibitor/substrate, was used to evaluate P-gp mediated interactions on either drug in comparison with the results reported in literature.
Methods This was a phase 1, single-center, open-label, 2-part, fixed-sequence crossover study conducted in healthy men.
Part 1 comprised of 2 treatment periods with LEN alone (25 mg single dose on Day 1) in period 1, followed by LEN (on Day 4) plus quinidine (300 mg twice daily [BID] on Day 1 and 600 mg BID on Days 2–5) in period 2.
  Part 2 consisted of three treatment periods with LEN (25 mg single dose on Day 1) alone in period 1, temsirolimus (25 mg single dose intravenously [IV] on Day 1) alone in period 2, and LEN plus temsirolimus in period 3 (Day 1).
 Treatment periods were separated by a washout of 7–10 days.
Serial samples were collected to determine the plasma, whole blood or urine concentrations of LEN, quinidine, and temsirolimus (and its active metabolite, sirolimus [also a P-gp inhibitor/substrate]).
  Safety was monitored throughout the study.
Results A total of 31 healthy men, aged 22 to 62 years; were enrolled (14 in Part 1 and 17 in Part 2).
Renal excretion of LEN was almost complete at 12 h post dose for all treatments (Figure 1).
In the absence or presence of a P-gp inhibitor, the mean percentage LEN dose excreted in the urine (74% vs 70% in Part 1, respectively; 81% vs 80% in Part 2) and renal clearance (227 vs 245 mL/min in Part 1; 251 vs 229 mL/min in Part 2) were similar, demonstrating that the rate and capacity of LEN renal excretion were not reduced by P-gp inhibition.
Both the median time (1 h) to reach the maximum concentration (Cmax) and the oral bioavailability (70–80% of the administrated dose, as indicated by the renal excretion of unchanged drug) of LEN, were comparable in the absence or presence of a P-gp inhibitor (0.
5–1 h and 74–81% of the dose, respectively); therefore, the rate and extent of LEN oral absorption were also not altered by P-gp inhibition.
Consequently, there was no significant change in the plasma exposure to LEN in the presence of a P-gp inhibitor (Figure 1).
The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratio of geometric means between LEN alone and LEN plus a P-gp inhibitor were completely contained within the equivalence limits of 80–125% for Cmaxand area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of LEN.
In addition, LEN had no effect on blood exposure to temsirolimus and sirolimus, with the 90% CIs for the ratio of their geometric mean Cmax and AUC between temsirolimus alone and temsirolimus plus LEN between 80–125%.
No significant safety findings were reported when LEN was given with quinidine or temsirolimus compared to LEN alone.
Conclusions Co-administration of either the P-gp inhibitor quinidine or temsirolimus had no clinically relevant effect on the systemic exposure of LEN.
  Similarly, co-administration of LEN had no clinically relevant effect on the systemic exposure of the P-gp substrates temsirolimus and sirolimus.
  A single dose of LEN was well tolerated when co-administered with quinidine or temsirolimus in healthy men.
Disclosures: Chen: Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership.
Weiss:Celegene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership.
Reyes:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership.
Liu:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership.
Kasserra:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership.
Wang:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership.
Zhou:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership.
Kumar:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership.
Weiss:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership.
Palmisano:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Related Results

Lenalidomide Enhances the Biological Activity of Galiximab Against Non-Hogkin’s Lymphoma In Vitro and In Vivo.
Lenalidomide Enhances the Biological Activity of Galiximab Against Non-Hogkin’s Lymphoma In Vitro and In Vivo.
Abstract Lenalidomide, a thalidomide analog, has dual anti-tumor activities against B-cell lymphomas and other hematological malignancies by inducing direct apoptosi...
Dual Proteasome and mTOR Inhibition Promotes Apoptosis in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Cell Lines
Dual Proteasome and mTOR Inhibition Promotes Apoptosis in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Cell Lines
Abstract Background: Bortezomib is a selective, reversible inhibitor of the ubiquitinproteasome pathway whose action leads to tumor growth arrest and induction of ap...
Preparation and characterization of armadillo submandibular glycoproteins
Preparation and characterization of armadillo submandibular glycoproteins
The nine-banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus mexicanus Peters) was chosen for this study so that a comparison could be made of the salivary mucus glycoproteins of an ancient mam...
Temsirolimus Adventitial Delivery to Improve ANGiographic Outcomes Below the Knee
Temsirolimus Adventitial Delivery to Improve ANGiographic Outcomes Below the Knee
Background: Current endovascular treatments of below the knee (BTK) popliteal or tibial/peroneal arteries including investigational drug-coated balloons have li...
R418 – Temsirolimus Preferentially Targets Tumor Microenvironment
R418 – Temsirolimus Preferentially Targets Tumor Microenvironment
ProblemThe mTOR pathway, a central regulator of cell metabolism, proliferation, and survival, is activated in a 100% of HNSCC. We have previously shown the mTOR inhibitor CCI‐779 (...

Back to Top