Javascript must be enabled to continue!
'de beste Schilders van het gantsche Nederlandt' Karel van Mander en het Haarlemse cultuurbeleid 1603-1606
View through CrossRef
AbstractKarel van Mander's Schilder-Boeck was published in 1604. During this period the Haarlem city council was pursuing an active cultural policy in which painting played a central role. In 1603, the porter at the Prinscnhof was instructed not to refuse admission to people who wanted to view the paintings and other objects of art housed there. That same year Hendrik Goltzius, Cornelis van Haarlem and Hendrik Vroom were commissioned to paint pictures of their own choice to commemmorate their art. The paintings were to hang in the Prinsenhof. In 1605 the council cndcavoured to ensure the city's claim to a number of paintings from the Jansklooster. This monastery, unlike others in Haarlem, had not been seized when the city became Protestant. The monks were allowed to keep their property until the last one died, but not to adopt any more monks. In 1605 the council demanded an inventory of the immovables and of the paintings too. The majority of the paintings in the inventory, which was supplied a year later, proved to be the work of highly esteemed artists. Although by no means all the art in the monasterey was listed, the city council did not protest. The intention had simply been to secure the important paintings with a view to placing in the Prinsenhof when the time came. Karel van Mander and his friends Cornelis van Haarlem and Hendrik Goltzius undoubtedly contributed to the creation of a climate in which such an art policy was feasible. Van Mander had spent years preparing his Schilder-Boeck, and had paid a great deal of attention to Haarlem painting. In his efforts to gather information the had established numerous contacts. He had carefully described he paintings in the Prinsenhof, and had also seen works by Haarlem painters belonging to private individuals. One such man was Gerrit Willemsz. van Schoterbosch, a burgomaster who had been on the council when that body commissioned Cornelis van Haarlem to make four paintings for the Prinsenhof during the last decade of the 16th century, and also during the period discussed here, 1603-1605. What were the aims of the city council in pursuing this cultural policy? There are two possibilities, both of which are encountered in the Schilder-Boeck. Van Mander wanted to elevate painting to a higher status than a craft. In his praise of painting he therefore dwelt at length on art lovers who collected paintings for art's sake. May not the city council have desired to assemble such a collection? If so, something very special was happening in Haarlem. Perhaps there is more to be said for the other possibility, to which Van Mander also refers: the council could have enlisted the Haarlem painters to sing the praises of the city.
Title: 'de beste Schilders van het gantsche Nederlandt' Karel van Mander en het Haarlemse cultuurbeleid 1603-1606
Description:
AbstractKarel van Mander's Schilder-Boeck was published in 1604.
During this period the Haarlem city council was pursuing an active cultural policy in which painting played a central role.
In 1603, the porter at the Prinscnhof was instructed not to refuse admission to people who wanted to view the paintings and other objects of art housed there.
That same year Hendrik Goltzius, Cornelis van Haarlem and Hendrik Vroom were commissioned to paint pictures of their own choice to commemmorate their art.
The paintings were to hang in the Prinsenhof.
In 1605 the council cndcavoured to ensure the city's claim to a number of paintings from the Jansklooster.
This monastery, unlike others in Haarlem, had not been seized when the city became Protestant.
The monks were allowed to keep their property until the last one died, but not to adopt any more monks.
In 1605 the council demanded an inventory of the immovables and of the paintings too.
The majority of the paintings in the inventory, which was supplied a year later, proved to be the work of highly esteemed artists.
Although by no means all the art in the monasterey was listed, the city council did not protest.
The intention had simply been to secure the important paintings with a view to placing in the Prinsenhof when the time came.
Karel van Mander and his friends Cornelis van Haarlem and Hendrik Goltzius undoubtedly contributed to the creation of a climate in which such an art policy was feasible.
Van Mander had spent years preparing his Schilder-Boeck, and had paid a great deal of attention to Haarlem painting.
In his efforts to gather information the had established numerous contacts.
He had carefully described he paintings in the Prinsenhof, and had also seen works by Haarlem painters belonging to private individuals.
One such man was Gerrit Willemsz.
van Schoterbosch, a burgomaster who had been on the council when that body commissioned Cornelis van Haarlem to make four paintings for the Prinsenhof during the last decade of the 16th century, and also during the period discussed here, 1603-1605.
What were the aims of the city council in pursuing this cultural policy? There are two possibilities, both of which are encountered in the Schilder-Boeck.
Van Mander wanted to elevate painting to a higher status than a craft.
In his praise of painting he therefore dwelt at length on art lovers who collected paintings for art's sake.
May not the city council have desired to assemble such a collection? If so, something very special was happening in Haarlem.
Perhaps there is more to be said for the other possibility, to which Van Mander also refers: the council could have enlisted the Haarlem painters to sing the praises of the city.
Related Results
Numéro 85 (nl) - février 2011
Numéro 85 (nl) - février 2011
Op initiatief van de federale overheid heeft het Belgische stelsel van werkloosheidsverze-kering sinds 2004 belangrijke veranderingen ondergaan. Het principe van de toekenning van ...
Het Laatste avondmaal, het eerst bekende schilderstuk van Karel van Mander de Jonge
Het Laatste avondmaal, het eerst bekende schilderstuk van Karel van Mander de Jonge
AbstractA large panel of the Last Supper (fig. 1) can now be attributed to Karel van Mander the Younger (Haarlem c. 1583 – Delft 1623), after cleaning by the present owner, Douwes ...
De Russische inspiratie van Joris Van Severen. Deel 2
De Russische inspiratie van Joris Van Severen. Deel 2
In de oorlogsdagboeken van Joris Van Severen valt zijn belangstelling op voor bepaalde aspecten van de Russische cultuur, die weinig met elkaar gemeen hebben, met name Dostojevski ...
GREATNESS IN FALL. KAREL VAN MANDER�S APPROACH TO CREATIVE FAILURE
GREATNESS IN FALL. KAREL VAN MANDER�S APPROACH TO CREATIVE FAILURE
The paper examines Karel van Mander�s consistent descriptions of artistic incompetence, technical mediocrity, and creative failure in Het Schilder-Boeck � or The Book of Painting, ...
Kleine kroniek van het VN-verdrag Handicap in de rechtspraak van het EHRM
Kleine kroniek van het VN-verdrag Handicap in de rechtspraak van het EHRM
Kleine kroniek van het VN-verdrag Handicap in de rechtspraak van het EHRM
Het Europese Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens (EHRM) past regelmatig het VN-verdrag Handicap toe ...
In goed gezelschap
In goed gezelschap
Een belangrijk deel van onze interesse in de wereld om onsheen is gericht op dieren. Niet alleen voor de voedselproductieof het transport, maar ook vanwege onze empathie voor henen...
Realisering van het recht op onaantastbaarheid van het lichaam door middel van wetgeving
Realisering van het recht op onaantastbaarheid van het lichaam door middel van wetgeving
Realisering van het recht op onaantastbaarheid van het lichaam door middel van wetgeving
In deze bijdrage wordt het nut en de meerwaarde van het recht op de onaantastbaar...
gepersonaliseerde preventieve Jeugdgezondheidszorg, de 360°KIND-profiel studies
gepersonaliseerde preventieve Jeugdgezondheidszorg, de 360°KIND-profiel studies
Deze proefschrift bespreking beschrijft het longitudinaal onderzoek dat is uitgevoerd in het kader van de ontwikkeling en evaluatie van een innovatief 360°KIND-profiel. Het doel wa...

