Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Facework and Culture
View through CrossRef
This is an advance summary of a forthcoming article in the Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. Please check back later for the full article.
Facework represents an important mediation of the intersection between an individual’s private self-conception and the individual’s need to cooperate—or not—in a society, especially at the interpersonal and organizational levels of communication. More clearly, facework builds on the notion of a metaphorical ‘face’, which represents how an individual is viewed—that is, respectfully or not—by others in an interaction. Facework is, then, in its basic form, the interpersonal skills or strategies (i.e., work) needed to maintain or elevate, and in some cases, hinder, others’ perception of an individual’s right to deserve respect. Culture mediates this interaction even further by dictating whose face an individual should be most concerned (i.e., face-concern) with during an interactional exchange. For example, individualistic cultures (e.g., United States, Canada, Germany) prioritize that individuals generally should be most concerned with protecting their own sense of respect (i.e., self-face) while interacting or in conflict, while collectivistic cultures (e.g., China, South Korea, Japan) prioritize the focus on maintaining the other individual’s (i.e., other-face) sense of dignity and respect in an interaction. Yet, individuals in either individualistic or collectivistic cultures may also choose to try to enact concern with both themselves and others in an interaction (i.e., mutual-face).
Other iterations of facework strategies and/or concerns—all at least partially mediated by cultural values and social norms—have emerged, including: face-negotiating, face-constituting, face-compensating, face-honoring, face-saving, face-threatening, face-building, face-protecting, face-depreciating, face-giving, face-restoring, and face-neutral. Notions of face and facework has also given rise to several face-oriented communication theories such as Face-Negotiation Theory (FNT), which aims to examine and predict, generally, how individuals in various cultures might negotiate and manage conflict(s) and conflict styles. Original understandings of face are primarily grounded in Erving Goffman’s sociological work on facework and Penelope Brown and Stephen Levinson’s Politeness Theory, works that have been used to examine and compare communication practices in multiple intercultural and cross-cultural contexts.
Title: Facework and Culture
Description:
This is an advance summary of a forthcoming article in the Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication.
Please check back later for the full article.
Facework represents an important mediation of the intersection between an individual’s private self-conception and the individual’s need to cooperate—or not—in a society, especially at the interpersonal and organizational levels of communication.
More clearly, facework builds on the notion of a metaphorical ‘face’, which represents how an individual is viewed—that is, respectfully or not—by others in an interaction.
Facework is, then, in its basic form, the interpersonal skills or strategies (i.
e.
, work) needed to maintain or elevate, and in some cases, hinder, others’ perception of an individual’s right to deserve respect.
Culture mediates this interaction even further by dictating whose face an individual should be most concerned (i.
e.
, face-concern) with during an interactional exchange.
For example, individualistic cultures (e.
g.
, United States, Canada, Germany) prioritize that individuals generally should be most concerned with protecting their own sense of respect (i.
e.
, self-face) while interacting or in conflict, while collectivistic cultures (e.
g.
, China, South Korea, Japan) prioritize the focus on maintaining the other individual’s (i.
e.
, other-face) sense of dignity and respect in an interaction.
Yet, individuals in either individualistic or collectivistic cultures may also choose to try to enact concern with both themselves and others in an interaction (i.
e.
, mutual-face).
Other iterations of facework strategies and/or concerns—all at least partially mediated by cultural values and social norms—have emerged, including: face-negotiating, face-constituting, face-compensating, face-honoring, face-saving, face-threatening, face-building, face-protecting, face-depreciating, face-giving, face-restoring, and face-neutral.
Notions of face and facework has also given rise to several face-oriented communication theories such as Face-Negotiation Theory (FNT), which aims to examine and predict, generally, how individuals in various cultures might negotiate and manage conflict(s) and conflict styles.
Original understandings of face are primarily grounded in Erving Goffman’s sociological work on facework and Penelope Brown and Stephen Levinson’s Politeness Theory, works that have been used to examine and compare communication practices in multiple intercultural and cross-cultural contexts.
Related Results
Historia, stan i potrzeby badań nad uzbrojeniem z ziem polskich okresów rzymskiego i wędrówek ludów. Spojrzenie subiektywne (pomimo dobrych chęci)
Historia, stan i potrzeby badań nad uzbrojeniem z ziem polskich okresów rzymskiego i wędrówek ludów. Spojrzenie subiektywne (pomimo dobrych chęci)
History, State of and Necessity for Research on the Roman and Migration Period Military Equipment from Poland. Subjective Approach (Despite Good Intentions)Significant studies on m...
Intercultural Conflict Styles and Facework
Intercultural Conflict Styles and Facework
Competent intercultural conflict management depends on many factors. One of the key factors is to increase our awareness and knowledge concerning diverse conflict styles and facewo...
Navigating Business Communication: Values and Facework
Navigating Business Communication: Values and Facework
Effective business communication contributes to business development and to the psychological well-being and job satisfaction of employees. Face concerns were proved to navigate co...
Online Grooming Communication: The Child’s Perspective
Online Grooming Communication: The Child’s Perspective
Online child sexual abuse (OCSEA) is a global pandemic and constantly evolving threat and urgent child protection emergency. It is a crime that takes many forms including digital c...
Mõtestades materiaalset kultuuri / Making sense of the material culture
Mõtestades materiaalset kultuuri / Making sense of the material culture
People live amidst objects, things, articles, items, artefacts, materials, substances, and stuff – described in social sciences and humanities as material culture, which denotes bo...
Organizational Culture Mapping and Home Industry Performance in Pasuruan Regency
Organizational Culture Mapping and Home Industry Performance in Pasuruan Regency
This study aimed to investigate the current and expected profile of organizational culture and its effect on employee performance. The research employed a quantitative approach, ut...
primary characteristics of English pragmatics in Applied Linguistics
primary characteristics of English pragmatics in Applied Linguistics
Pragmatics is a linguistic field that explores the complex relationship between language, context, and meaning. It involves analyzing how speakers and writers use language to conve...

