Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Processing Country Centroids at the Global Biodiversity Information Facility
View through CrossRef
The Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) is an international network and data infrastructure that promotes open access to biodiversity data. GBIF serves as a global hub for aggregating and disseminating biodiversity information from diverse sources, including museums, research institutions, and citizen science projects.
I will present recent additions to GBIF data quality measures, focusing on the introduction of the country centroid filtering feature. Additionally, I explore the functionality and significance of GBIF data quality flags, which aid in assessing the reliability and usability of the aggregated data. I will also discuss recent changes to the default filtering mechanism employed by GBIF to remove suspicious points.
GBIF Data Quality Flags
GBIF employs a large set of data quality flags to provide users with an assessment of the reliability and fitness for use of the aggregated data. These flags are assigned based on various quality-related criteria, such as geographic precision, taxonomic accuracy, and completeness of associated metadata. By analyzing these flags, users can make informed decisions regarding the suitability of data for their specific research or conservation needs. GBIF data quality flags serve as valuable indicators that facilitate data filtering and enhance data usability. These flags are assigned to individual occurrence records based on various quality-related criteria and are designed to help data users evaluate the trustworthiness and suitability of the data for their specific needs.
Country Centroid filter
Retrospective geocoding is a process in which historical occurrence data lacking precise geographic coordinates are assigned approximate mappable locations based on other available information, such as locality descriptions, gazetteers, or administrative boundaries. Retrospective geocoding introduces centroids into occurrence datasets wherever better information than a large named area is unknown. A Country centroid refers to the geographical center point of a country's geographic polygon.
Recently, GBIF has implemented country centroid filtering as a feature. By utilizing this filtering technique, GBIF users can identify and exclude occurrences that are country or area centroids. This ensures that data users receive more accurate and reliable information, reducing potential errors resulting from georeferencing issues.
The Catalogue of Centroids is a GitHub repository designed to collect and provide a comprehensive list of country centroids for the purpose of occurrence data filtering. The repository serves as a central resource for storing and sharing centroid coordinates associated with each country, area, or province. The main idea is to gather the from sources most often used during retrospective geo-referencing of museum collections.
Fig. 1
Default Filtering and Treatment of Suspicious Points
GBIF employs default filtering mechanisms to identify suspicious occurrences from its aggregated datasets. For example, the "Country Coordinate Mismatch" data quality flag in GBIF is a quality assessment indicator that highlights occurrences where there is a potential mismatch between the recorded coordinates and the associated country information. Similarly, zero coordinates are often encountered as placeholders or missing data points. GBIF's default filtering process identifies such occurrences from the dataset, as they can introduce inaccuracies when conducting spatial analyses or mapping exercises. This step ensures that only reliable and valid occurrences are available for further analyses and downstream applications.
GBIF continues to improve data quality flagging, which significantly enables users to assess the fitness of data for a particular use and increases the utility of the mediated biodiversity information.
Title: Processing Country Centroids at the Global Biodiversity Information Facility
Description:
The Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) is an international network and data infrastructure that promotes open access to biodiversity data.
GBIF serves as a global hub for aggregating and disseminating biodiversity information from diverse sources, including museums, research institutions, and citizen science projects.
I will present recent additions to GBIF data quality measures, focusing on the introduction of the country centroid filtering feature.
Additionally, I explore the functionality and significance of GBIF data quality flags, which aid in assessing the reliability and usability of the aggregated data.
I will also discuss recent changes to the default filtering mechanism employed by GBIF to remove suspicious points.
GBIF Data Quality Flags
GBIF employs a large set of data quality flags to provide users with an assessment of the reliability and fitness for use of the aggregated data.
These flags are assigned based on various quality-related criteria, such as geographic precision, taxonomic accuracy, and completeness of associated metadata.
By analyzing these flags, users can make informed decisions regarding the suitability of data for their specific research or conservation needs.
GBIF data quality flags serve as valuable indicators that facilitate data filtering and enhance data usability.
These flags are assigned to individual occurrence records based on various quality-related criteria and are designed to help data users evaluate the trustworthiness and suitability of the data for their specific needs.
Country Centroid filter
Retrospective geocoding is a process in which historical occurrence data lacking precise geographic coordinates are assigned approximate mappable locations based on other available information, such as locality descriptions, gazetteers, or administrative boundaries.
Retrospective geocoding introduces centroids into occurrence datasets wherever better information than a large named area is unknown.
A Country centroid refers to the geographical center point of a country's geographic polygon.
Recently, GBIF has implemented country centroid filtering as a feature.
By utilizing this filtering technique, GBIF users can identify and exclude occurrences that are country or area centroids.
This ensures that data users receive more accurate and reliable information, reducing potential errors resulting from georeferencing issues.
The Catalogue of Centroids is a GitHub repository designed to collect and provide a comprehensive list of country centroids for the purpose of occurrence data filtering.
The repository serves as a central resource for storing and sharing centroid coordinates associated with each country, area, or province.
The main idea is to gather the from sources most often used during retrospective geo-referencing of museum collections.
Fig.
1
Default Filtering and Treatment of Suspicious Points
GBIF employs default filtering mechanisms to identify suspicious occurrences from its aggregated datasets.
For example, the "Country Coordinate Mismatch" data quality flag in GBIF is a quality assessment indicator that highlights occurrences where there is a potential mismatch between the recorded coordinates and the associated country information.
Similarly, zero coordinates are often encountered as placeholders or missing data points.
GBIF's default filtering process identifies such occurrences from the dataset, as they can introduce inaccuracies when conducting spatial analyses or mapping exercises.
This step ensures that only reliable and valid occurrences are available for further analyses and downstream applications.
GBIF continues to improve data quality flagging, which significantly enables users to assess the fitness of data for a particular use and increases the utility of the mediated biodiversity information.
Related Results
Global Open Biodiversity Data: Future Vision of FAIR Biodiversity Data Access, Management, Use and Stewardship
Global Open Biodiversity Data: Future Vision of FAIR Biodiversity Data Access, Management, Use and Stewardship
Major environmental–biodiversity changes and new developments in technology have changed the way we live, work and how we create our future. The main attention of biodiversity rese...
The business case for investing in biodiversity data
The business case for investing in biodiversity data
1. The private sector is increasingly aware of its dependence on biodiversity and the financial risks and opportunities involved. This has generated a lot of demand for investing i...
The Burden of Road Traffic Injuries: A Global Perspective
The Burden of Road Traffic Injuries: A Global Perspective
Introduction Road Traffic Injury (RTI) pose a significant health challenge. It represents the eighth leading cause of death globally, prompting the UN to designate 2011-2020 as...
Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG): Social and Conceptual Infrastructure for Integrating Biodiversity Information
Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG): Social and Conceptual Infrastructure for Integrating Biodiversity Information
The International Working Group on Taxonomic Databases (TDWG)*1 was established in 1985 to promote biodiversity data sharing and collaboration among organizations, projects, and pe...
The biodiversity of ice‐free Antarctica database
The biodiversity of ice‐free Antarctica database
AbstractAntarctica is one of Earth's most untouched, inhospitable, and poorly known regions. Although knowledge of its biodiversity has increased over recent decades, a diverse, wi...
Recommendations for Social Media Use in Hospitals and Health Care Facilities
Recommendations for Social Media Use in Hospitals and Health Care Facilities
Social Media is the new avenue for creating connections and sharing of information. Through social media, one can reach a global community. In recent years, we have seen how soc...
Systemic bio-inequity links poverty to biodiversity and induces a conservation paradox
Systemic bio-inequity links poverty to biodiversity and induces a conservation paradox
Abstract
Biodiversity is declining globally while inequity is growing, and poverty rates are not impr...
Comparative Methods for Building Chatbots: Open Source, Hybrid, and Fully Integrated Large Language Models
Comparative Methods for Building Chatbots: Open Source, Hybrid, and Fully Integrated Large Language Models
In the complex and dynamic realm of biodiversity informatics, the accessibility and comprehension of standards and vocabularies are pivotal for, but not limited to, effective data ...

