Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Sociological History of Transforming TDWG to Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG)

View through CrossRef
Thirty-seven years—why celebrate this prime number anniversary of the founding of the Taxonomic Databases Working Group (TDWG) in 1985? Because we wanted to look at the history of TDWG through its people (and coincidentally, 37˚C is considered "normal" human temperature, so why not?). Records from 1985's inaugural meeting at the Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques in Geneva, Switzerland, 28–30 September show that it was attended by 12 representatives of the botanical community. Although the attendees were listed by salutation (i.e., Dr., Prof., Mr.) and by first initials along with surnames, the group was all male, composed mainly of European and American botanists with doctorates. How has TDWG morphed over these 37 years from a group of geeky botanists in the early days of museum computerization and six years before the World Wide Web was introduced to the public, to the organization known today as Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG)? TDWG has always been an open and community-driven organization with decisions made by consensus. Anyone can become a member, individuals as well as institutions (including government agencies, non-governmental organizations, programs, and projects). Everything TDWG produces comes from the expertise, collaboration, and support of its members—people and organizations who create, manage, integrate, and analyze biodiversity information. Today's TDWG looks very different from the one in 1985, but the seeds of the organization were there, even then. While this presentation is about TDWG's history as an organization, its focus will be on the heart of TDWG: its people. We would like to show how the organization has evolved in terms of gender balance, inclusivity actions, and our engagement to promote and enhance diversity at all levels. But more importantly, where do we—as a community—want to go in the future?
Title: The Sociological History of Transforming TDWG to Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG)
Description:
Thirty-seven years—why celebrate this prime number anniversary of the founding of the Taxonomic Databases Working Group (TDWG) in 1985? Because we wanted to look at the history of TDWG through its people (and coincidentally, 37˚C is considered "normal" human temperature, so why not?).
Records from 1985's inaugural meeting at the Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques in Geneva, Switzerland, 28–30 September show that it was attended by 12 representatives of the botanical community.
Although the attendees were listed by salutation (i.
e.
, Dr.
, Prof.
, Mr.
) and by first initials along with surnames, the group was all male, composed mainly of European and American botanists with doctorates.
How has TDWG morphed over these 37 years from a group of geeky botanists in the early days of museum computerization and six years before the World Wide Web was introduced to the public, to the organization known today as Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG)? TDWG has always been an open and community-driven organization with decisions made by consensus.
Anyone can become a member, individuals as well as institutions (including government agencies, non-governmental organizations, programs, and projects).
Everything TDWG produces comes from the expertise, collaboration, and support of its members—people and organizations who create, manage, integrate, and analyze biodiversity information.
Today's TDWG looks very different from the one in 1985, but the seeds of the organization were there, even then.
While this presentation is about TDWG's history as an organization, its focus will be on the heart of TDWG: its people.
We would like to show how the organization has evolved in terms of gender balance, inclusivity actions, and our engagement to promote and enhance diversity at all levels.
But more importantly, where do we—as a community—want to go in the future?.

Related Results

Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG): Social and Conceptual Infrastructure for Integrating Biodiversity Information
Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG): Social and Conceptual Infrastructure for Integrating Biodiversity Information
The International Working Group on Taxonomic Databases (TDWG)*1 was established in 1985 to promote biodiversity data sharing and collaboration among organizations, projects, and pe...
Comparative Methods for Building Chatbots: Open Source, Hybrid, and Fully Integrated Large Language Models
Comparative Methods for Building Chatbots: Open Source, Hybrid, and Fully Integrated Large Language Models
In the complex and dynamic realm of biodiversity informatics, the accessibility and comprehension of standards and vocabularies are pivotal for, but not limited to, effective data ...
Retiring TDWG Standards and How Mapping Standards Could Support Agility
Retiring TDWG Standards and How Mapping Standards Could Support Agility
Since its genesis in September 1985, TDWG (formerly Taxonomic Databases Working Group now Biodiversity Information Standards) has become the steward of standards for the biodiversi...
Building Biodiversity Digital Twins
Building Biodiversity Digital Twins
A digital twin is a replica of a system, process, or object realized as a digital version. Digital twins are widespread in engineering and aim to can help many kinds of organizatio...
Global Open Biodiversity Data: Future Vision of FAIR Biodiversity Data Access, Management, Use and Stewardship
Global Open Biodiversity Data: Future Vision of FAIR Biodiversity Data Access, Management, Use and Stewardship
Major environmental–biodiversity changes and new developments in technology have changed the way we live, work and how we create our future. The main attention of biodiversity rese...
The business case for investing in biodiversity data
The business case for investing in biodiversity data
1. The private sector is increasingly aware of its dependence on biodiversity and the financial risks and opportunities involved. This has generated a lot of demand for investing i...
Join the Dots: Adding collection assessment to collection descriptions
Join the Dots: Adding collection assessment to collection descriptions
The natural science collections community has identified an increasing need for shared, structured and interoperable data standards that can be used to describe the totality of ins...
An Investigation of Secondary School Students’ Biodiversity Literacy Level
An Investigation of Secondary School Students’ Biodiversity Literacy Level
The quality of life sustained by human beings is largely possible thanks to the opportunities offered by the biodiversity resources in nature. It is widely accepted that the contin...

Back to Top