Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Discussion: Confirmation, Paradox, and Logic
View through CrossRef
Paul Horwich has formulated a paradox which he believes to be even more virulent than the related Hempel paradox. I show that Horwich's paradox, as originally formulated, has a purely logical solution, hence that it has no bearing on the theory of confirmation. On the other hand, it illuminates some undesirable traits of classical predicate logic. A revised formulation of the paradox is then dealt with in a way that implies a modest revision of Nicod's criterion.
Title: Discussion: Confirmation, Paradox, and Logic
Description:
Paul Horwich has formulated a paradox which he believes to be even more virulent than the related Hempel paradox.
I show that Horwich's paradox, as originally formulated, has a purely logical solution, hence that it has no bearing on the theory of confirmation.
On the other hand, it illuminates some undesirable traits of classical predicate logic.
A revised formulation of the paradox is then dealt with in a way that implies a modest revision of Nicod's criterion.
Related Results
Epistemic extensions of substructural inquisitive logics
Epistemic extensions of substructural inquisitive logics
Abstract
In this paper, we study the epistemic extensions of distributive substructural inquisitive logics. Substructural inquisitive logics are logics of questions ...
Intuitionistic ancestral logic
Intuitionistic ancestral logic
Abstract
In this article we define pure intuitionistic Ancestral Logic ( iAL ), extending pure intuitionistic First-Order Logic ( iFOL ). This logic is a dependently...
A Logic for Desire Based on Causal Inference
A Logic for Desire Based on Causal Inference
Abstract
Reasoning about desire plays a significant role in logic, artificial intelligence and philosophy, etc. In this paper, we propose an interpretation of desire...
Searching for Similarity
Searching for Similarity
Throughout the twentieth and twenty-first centuries regulations on expert testimony have sought to minimize the impact of disagreeing experts. Yet, disagreements between forensic m...
Selective confirmation and the Ravens
Selective confirmation and the Ravens
A Qualitative concept of selective dyadic confirmation — not Scheffler's and Goodman's —can be readily defined piggy-back upon the qualitative concepts of dyadic confirmation and d...
Heidegger’s Black Notebooks and the Logic of a History of Being
Heidegger’s Black Notebooks and the Logic of a History of Being
Abstract
Interpretations of the so-called Black Notebooks have emphasized the interaction between Heidegger’s philosophy, particularly his notion of a “history of being” (Seinsgesc...
The First USA Performance of Tuvan Throat Singers
The First USA Performance of Tuvan Throat Singers
Until the 1990s khöömei or throat singing from Tuva was virtually unknown outside the then-USSR. Russian researchers like Aksenov and Shchurov had published the results of their fi...
Tiempo y narratividad en la fotografía: de la paradoja al campo expandido
Tiempo y narratividad en la fotografía: de la paradoja al campo expandido
El análisis de las relaciones entre tiempo y narratividad en la fotografía toma como punto de partida la paradoja entre instantánea y posado, tal como ha sido planteada por Thierry...