Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Codification of legislation or codification of law: statement of the problem
View through CrossRef
The publication is devoted to the problem of choosing a formulation that most fully reveals the nature of legal codification. Basically, researchers write either about the codification of legislation or about the codification of law. A number of works also talk about the codification of legislative norms or legal norms. As a rule, «fluctuations» in doctrine are more noticeable at the branch level, when it is impossible to limit oneself to the word «codification» but it is necessary to also indicate the area being codified. The article shows that the differences in wording are due, firstly, to the different understanding by scholars of the subject (object) of codification, that is, what is subject to codification processing within the framework of a given legal practice. Secondly, the concepts of «codification» and «codification of legislation» themselves can be interpreted differently. If we see codification as a process of «law-systematizing law-making», then we should use the formulation «codification of law» («codification of legal norms», «legal codification»). It is precisely legal norms (law as a whole), and not legislation, that are the main subject of codification, selected from diverse and unorganized sources (forms) of law and other documents containing legal information. The subject of codification is not only legislative norms; it is much broader. The phrase «codification of legislation» in the sense of the subject of such activity is incorrect; its consolidation in doctrine and practice was due to a change in the meaning of the term «law» (from «legal norm» to «normative act»). If the term «codification» is considered not as a process (what we are codifying), but as a goal (what we are codifying for), then we are talking about improving legislation, not law, and the formulation «codification of legislation» will look quite correctly. It seems, however, that the formulation «codification of law», reflecting the subject of the activity, more fully reveals the essence of this type of legal systematization (selection of legal norms from numerous sources and their ordering in a new codified act). Legislation can be improved not only through codification. In general, it is proposed to proceed from the fact that it is the law that is codified, while legislation is improved (reformed) in the course of codification.
P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University
Title: Codification of legislation or codification of law: statement of the problem
Description:
The publication is devoted to the problem of choosing a formulation that most fully reveals the nature of legal codification.
Basically, researchers write either about the codification of legislation or about the codification of law.
A number of works also talk about the codification of legislative norms or legal norms.
As a rule, «fluctuations» in doctrine are more noticeable at the branch level, when it is impossible to limit oneself to the word «codification» but it is necessary to also indicate the area being codified.
The article shows that the differences in wording are due, firstly, to the different understanding by scholars of the subject (object) of codification, that is, what is subject to codification processing within the framework of a given legal practice.
Secondly, the concepts of «codification» and «codification of legislation» themselves can be interpreted differently.
If we see codification as a process of «law-systematizing law-making», then we should use the formulation «codification of law» («codification of legal norms», «legal codification»).
It is precisely legal norms (law as a whole), and not legislation, that are the main subject of codification, selected from diverse and unorganized sources (forms) of law and other documents containing legal information.
The subject of codification is not only legislative norms; it is much broader.
The phrase «codification of legislation» in the sense of the subject of such activity is incorrect; its consolidation in doctrine and practice was due to a change in the meaning of the term «law» (from «legal norm» to «normative act»).
If the term «codification» is considered not as a process (what we are codifying), but as a goal (what we are codifying for), then we are talking about improving legislation, not law, and the formulation «codification of legislation» will look quite correctly.
It seems, however, that the formulation «codification of law», reflecting the subject of the activity, more fully reveals the essence of this type of legal systematization (selection of legal norms from numerous sources and their ordering in a new codified act).
Legislation can be improved not only through codification.
In general, it is proposed to proceed from the fact that it is the law that is codified, while legislation is improved (reformed) in the course of codification.
Related Results
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...
Mezinárodní právo na prahu 21. století (dosažený stav, neúspěchy a perspektivy)
Mezinárodní právo na prahu 21. století (dosažený stav, neúspěchy a perspektivy)
The study deal with selected problems of international law at the time of change of the 20th and 21st centuries. Such a milestone gives an opportunity to review the achieved state ...
Paul’s view of the law in Romans and the Ethiopic tradition
Paul’s view of the law in Romans and the Ethiopic tradition
ABSTRACT
This dissertation examines Paul’s view of the law in Romans, interacting with modern exegetical traditions addressing the Old, New, and Radical New Perspectives, aiming to...
Atypical business law provisions
Atypical business law provisions
The article is devoted to the vision of atypical business law provisions. It was found that the state of scientific opinion regarding atypical business law provisions is irrelevant...
SYSTEMIC REFORM OF CHINESE ANTICORRUPTION LEGISLATION AND ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE
SYSTEMIC REFORM OF CHINESE ANTICORRUPTION LEGISLATION AND ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE
The subject. The article is devoted to the analysis of ongoing systematic reform of Chinese anticorruption legislation and practice of its enforcement.The purpose of the article is...
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Photo ID 123697425 © Alexandersikov | Dreamstime.com
Abstract
Originalism is an increasingly prevalent method for interpreting provisions of the US Constitution. It requires strict...
THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ISSUES OF LEGISLATIVE CODIFICATION
THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ISSUES OF LEGISLATIVE CODIFICATION
This article provides a systematic analysis of the theoretical and practical aspects of legislative codification on a scientific basis. The main goal of the study is to clarify the...
Editorial: Complexity of Medical Law
Editorial: Complexity of Medical Law
If one puts forward a question what medical law is all about, the common answer will be medical mishaps as result of clinical negligence leading to lawsuit and/or inquires of disci...

