Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Medicare Physician Payment Systems: Impact of 2011 Schedule on Interventional Pain Management
View through CrossRef
Physicians in the United States have been affected by significant changes in the patterns
of medical practice evolving over the last several decades. The recently passed affordable
health care law, termed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (the
ACA, for short) affects physicians more than any other law. Physician services are an
integral part of health care. Physicians are paid in the United States for their personal
services. This payment also includes the overhead expenses for maintaining an office
and providing services. The payment system is highly variable in the private insurance
market; however, governmental systems have a formula-based payment, mostly based
on the Medicare payment system. Physician services are billed under Part B.
Since the inception of the Medicare program in 1965, several methods have been used
to determine the amounts paid to physicians for each covered service. Initially, the
payment systems compensated physicians on the basis of their charges. In 1975, just
over 10 years after the inception of the Medicare program, payments changed so as not
to exceed the increase in the Medical Economic Index (MEI). Nevertheless, the policy
failed to curb increases in costs, leading to the determination of a yearly change in fees
by legislation from 1984 to 1991. In 1992, the fee schedule essentially replaced the
prior payment system that was based on the physician’s charges, which also failed to
live up to expectations for operational success. Then, in 1998, the sustainable growth
rate (SGR) system was introduced. In 2009, multiple attempts were made by Congress
to repeal the formula – rather unsuccessfully. Consequently, the SGR formula continues
to hamper physician payments. The mechanism of the SGR includes 3 components
that are incorporated into a statutory formula: expenditure targets, growth rate period,
and annual adjustments of payment rates for physician services. Further, the relative
value of a physician fee schedule is based on 3 components: physician work, practice
expense (PE), and malpractice expense that are used to determine a value ranking for
each service to which it is applied. On average, the work component represents 53.5%
of a service’s relative value, the fee component represents 43.6%, and the malpractice
component represents 3.9%.
The final schedule for physician payment was issued on November 24, 2010. This was
based on a total cut of 30.8% with 24.9% of the cut attributed to SGR. However, as
usual, with patchwork efficiency, Congress passed a one-year extension of the 0%
update, effective through December 2011. Consequently, CMS issued an emergency
update of the 2011 Medicare fee schedule, with multiple revisions, resulting in a
reduction of the conversion factor of $36.8729 from December 2010 to $33.9764 for
2011.
Key words: Health policy, physician payment policy, physician fee schedule, Medicare,
sustained growth rate formula, interventional pain management, regulatory reform
Title: Medicare Physician Payment Systems:
Impact of 2011 Schedule on Interventional
Pain Management
Description:
Physicians in the United States have been affected by significant changes in the patterns
of medical practice evolving over the last several decades.
The recently passed affordable
health care law, termed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (the
ACA, for short) affects physicians more than any other law.
Physician services are an
integral part of health care.
Physicians are paid in the United States for their personal
services.
This payment also includes the overhead expenses for maintaining an office
and providing services.
The payment system is highly variable in the private insurance
market; however, governmental systems have a formula-based payment, mostly based
on the Medicare payment system.
Physician services are billed under Part B.
Since the inception of the Medicare program in 1965, several methods have been used
to determine the amounts paid to physicians for each covered service.
Initially, the
payment systems compensated physicians on the basis of their charges.
In 1975, just
over 10 years after the inception of the Medicare program, payments changed so as not
to exceed the increase in the Medical Economic Index (MEI).
Nevertheless, the policy
failed to curb increases in costs, leading to the determination of a yearly change in fees
by legislation from 1984 to 1991.
In 1992, the fee schedule essentially replaced the
prior payment system that was based on the physician’s charges, which also failed to
live up to expectations for operational success.
Then, in 1998, the sustainable growth
rate (SGR) system was introduced.
In 2009, multiple attempts were made by Congress
to repeal the formula – rather unsuccessfully.
Consequently, the SGR formula continues
to hamper physician payments.
The mechanism of the SGR includes 3 components
that are incorporated into a statutory formula: expenditure targets, growth rate period,
and annual adjustments of payment rates for physician services.
Further, the relative
value of a physician fee schedule is based on 3 components: physician work, practice
expense (PE), and malpractice expense that are used to determine a value ranking for
each service to which it is applied.
On average, the work component represents 53.
5%
of a service’s relative value, the fee component represents 43.
6%, and the malpractice
component represents 3.
9%.
The final schedule for physician payment was issued on November 24, 2010.
This was
based on a total cut of 30.
8% with 24.
9% of the cut attributed to SGR.
However, as
usual, with patchwork efficiency, Congress passed a one-year extension of the 0%
update, effective through December 2011.
Consequently, CMS issued an emergency
update of the 2011 Medicare fee schedule, with multiple revisions, resulting in a
reduction of the conversion factor of $36.
8729 from December 2010 to $33.
9764 for
2011.
Key words: Health policy, physician payment policy, physician fee schedule, Medicare,
sustained growth rate formula, interventional pain management, regulatory reform.
Related Results
Proposed Physician Payment Schedule for 2013:
Guarded Prognosis for Interventional Pain
Management
Proposed Physician Payment Schedule for 2013:
Guarded Prognosis for Interventional Pain
Management
As happens every year, on July 1, 2012, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services issued
a proposed policy and payment rate for services furnished under the Medicare physician...
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Abstract
Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex and often overlooked condition caused by the compression of neurovascular structures as they pass through the thoracic outlet. ...
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Given the rarity of chest wall hydatid disease, information on this condition is primarily drawn from case reports. Hence, this study systematically reviews t...
The Decline of Medicare Reimbursement in Clinical Pathology
The Decline of Medicare Reimbursement in Clinical Pathology
Abstract
Introduction/Objective
Access to clinical pathology services nationwide is threatened by the lack of an annual inflatio...
Impact of Site-Neutral Payments for Commercial and Employer-Sponsored Plans
Impact of Site-Neutral Payments for Commercial and Employer-Sponsored Plans
Site-neutral payment is a policy created by federal rule making and implemented by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) that aims to reduce healthcare costs by alig...
Evaluation of Primary Care Physician Chronic
Pain Management Practice Patterns
Evaluation of Primary Care Physician Chronic
Pain Management Practice Patterns
Background: The management of chronic pain is complex and often involves the integration
of multiple clinical, humanistic, and economic factors. Primary care physicians (PCPs) are ...
DIGITAL PAYMENT SYSTEMS: A FUTURE OUTLOOK
DIGITAL PAYMENT SYSTEMS: A FUTURE OUTLOOK
Purpose- This study examines the development of digital payment systems with the evolution of communication technologies, financial institutions and fintech companies. Also, this s...
Pain Catastrophizing and Impact on Pelvic Floor Surgery Experience
Pain Catastrophizing and Impact on Pelvic Floor Surgery Experience
ABSTRACT
Duration, intensity, and management of pain and discomfort may all be affected by experience, personality, and medical and psychosocial comorbidities. A negative...

