Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Neotectonic mountain uplift and geomorphology
View through CrossRef
Mountains are topographic features caused by erosion after vertical uplift or mountain building. Mountain building is often confused with orogeny, which today means the formation of structures in fold belts. The common assumption that folding and mountain building go together is generally untrue. Many mountains occur in unfolded rocks, granites and volcanic rocks, so there is no direct association of folding and mountain building. In those places where mountains are underlain by folded rocks the folding pre-dates planation and uplift. The age of mountains is therefore not the age of the last folding (if any) but the age of vertical uplift. Since mountains are not restricted to folded rocks, lateral compression is not required to explain the uplift.
A compilation of times of uplift of mountains around the world shows that a major phase of tectonic uplift started about 6 Ma, and much uplift occurred in the last 2 Ma. This period is known as the Neotectonic Period. It is a global phenomenon including mountains on passive continental margins, and those in deep continental interiors. Several hypotheses of mountain building have problems with this timing. Some fail by being only able to make mountains out of folded rock at continental margins. Many translate the vertical uplift into lateral compression, but vertical uplift alone can create mountains.
The Neotectonic Period has important implications for geomorphology, climate and global tectonics. In geomorphology it does not fit into conventional theories of geomorphology such as Davisian or King cycles of erosion. Neotectonic uplift might initiate several cycles of erosion, but most planation surfaces are much older than the Neotectonic Period. The increasing relief associated with Neotectonic uplift affected rates of erosion and sedimentation, and also late Cenozoic climate.
The Neotectonic Period does not fit within plate tectonics theory, in which mountains are explained as a result of compression at active margins: mountains in other locations are said to have been caused by the same process but further back in time. This is disproved by the young age of uplift of mountains in intercontinental and passive margin positions. Subduction is supposed to have been continuous for hundreds of millions of years, so fails to explain the world-wide uplifts in just a few million years.
Geomorphologists should be guided by their own findings, and refrain from theory-driven hypotheses of plate collision or landscape evolution.
Title: Neotectonic mountain uplift and geomorphology
Description:
Mountains are topographic features caused by erosion after vertical uplift or mountain building.
Mountain building is often confused with orogeny, which today means the formation of structures in fold belts.
The common assumption that folding and mountain building go together is generally untrue.
Many mountains occur in unfolded rocks, granites and volcanic rocks, so there is no direct association of folding and mountain building.
In those places where mountains are underlain by folded rocks the folding pre-dates planation and uplift.
The age of mountains is therefore not the age of the last folding (if any) but the age of vertical uplift.
Since mountains are not restricted to folded rocks, lateral compression is not required to explain the uplift.
A compilation of times of uplift of mountains around the world shows that a major phase of tectonic uplift started about 6 Ma, and much uplift occurred in the last 2 Ma.
This period is known as the Neotectonic Period.
It is a global phenomenon including mountains on passive continental margins, and those in deep continental interiors.
Several hypotheses of mountain building have problems with this timing.
Some fail by being only able to make mountains out of folded rock at continental margins.
Many translate the vertical uplift into lateral compression, but vertical uplift alone can create mountains.
The Neotectonic Period has important implications for geomorphology, climate and global tectonics.
In geomorphology it does not fit into conventional theories of geomorphology such as Davisian or King cycles of erosion.
Neotectonic uplift might initiate several cycles of erosion, but most planation surfaces are much older than the Neotectonic Period.
The increasing relief associated with Neotectonic uplift affected rates of erosion and sedimentation, and also late Cenozoic climate.
The Neotectonic Period does not fit within plate tectonics theory, in which mountains are explained as a result of compression at active margins: mountains in other locations are said to have been caused by the same process but further back in time.
This is disproved by the young age of uplift of mountains in intercontinental and passive margin positions.
Subduction is supposed to have been continuous for hundreds of millions of years, so fails to explain the world-wide uplifts in just a few million years.
Geomorphologists should be guided by their own findings, and refrain from theory-driven hypotheses of plate collision or landscape evolution.
Related Results
Geomorphology
Geomorphology
Geomorphology is the science that studies landforms and landforming processes. Topics of research in geomorphology during the 1990s represent the diversity of the discipline, as pr...
Neotectonic fault significance
Neotectonic fault significance
This paper presents a sensitivity analysis on the significance of neotectonic faults at various slip and distance scenarios to seismic hazard ground motion estimates. The analysis ...
Apatite Fission Track Evidence of Uplift Cooling in the Qiangtang Basin and Constraints on the Tibetan Plateau Uplift
Apatite Fission Track Evidence of Uplift Cooling in the Qiangtang Basin and Constraints on the Tibetan Plateau Uplift
AbstractThe Qiangtang basin is located in the central Tibetan Plateau. This basin has an important structural position, and further study of its tectonic and thermal histories has ...
Contributions to stratigraphy
Contributions to stratigraphy
The cratonic Boothia Uplift constitutes a major geological province in the Canadian Arctic. It is 800 km long and 150 km wide and extends from Boothia Peninsula on the continental ...
Upper plate deformation and its relationship to the underlying Hikurangi subduction interface, southern North Island, New Zealand
Upper plate deformation and its relationship to the underlying Hikurangi subduction interface, southern North Island, New Zealand
<p>At the southern Hikurangi margin, the subduction interface between the Australian and Pacific plates, beneath the southern North Island of New Zealand, is ‘locked’. It has...
A bayesian approach for Uplift modeling : application on biased data
A bayesian approach for Uplift modeling : application on biased data
Une approche bayésienne pour la modélisation de l'Uplift : application sur des données biaisées
La modélisation de l'uplift vise à estimer l'impact incrémental d'un...
Viscous relaxation of Pluto’s clathrate-insulated ice shell below Sputnik Planitia
Viscous relaxation of Pluto’s clathrate-insulated ice shell below Sputnik Planitia
AbstractSputnik Planitia, a 1000 km wide, Pluto-dominating feature, is located very close to Pluto-Charon tidal axis. To explain its position, a reorientation driven by a postimpac...
Sedimentary Evolution of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau in Cenozoic and its Response to the Uplift of the Plateau
Sedimentary Evolution of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau in Cenozoic and its Response to the Uplift of the Plateau
Abstract:We have studied the evolution of the tectonic lithofacies paleogeography of Paleocene–Eocene, Oligocene, Miocene, and Pliocene of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau by compiling da...

