Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Confessions
View through CrossRef
Chapter 4 examines the extent to which evidence of a confession by an accused person may be utilized by the prosecution at trial. It discusses confessions and miscarriages of justice; mandatory and discretionary exclusions; ‘tainting’ of subsequent confessions; warnings on account of ‘mental handicap’; withdrawal of the case from the jury; partly adverse statements; the use of confessions contravening section 76(2) of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984; confessions admissible in evidence only against maker; use of a co-defendant’s confession by a defendant; the voir dire hearing; and reform of the law of confessions.
Title: Confessions
Description:
Chapter 4 examines the extent to which evidence of a confession by an accused person may be utilized by the prosecution at trial.
It discusses confessions and miscarriages of justice; mandatory and discretionary exclusions; ‘tainting’ of subsequent confessions; warnings on account of ‘mental handicap’; withdrawal of the case from the jury; partly adverse statements; the use of confessions contravening section 76(2) of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984; confessions admissible in evidence only against maker; use of a co-defendant’s confession by a defendant; the voir dire hearing; and reform of the law of confessions.
Related Results
Confessions make verdicts more legitimate because they are easy to communicate
Confessions make verdicts more legitimate because they are easy to communicate
In many judicial systems, confessions are a de facto or even de jure requirement for criminal conviction. Even if confessions are intrinsically convincing, this cannot explain why ...
Coercion, Trauma, and Grief in the Interrogation Room: Documenting and Analyzing Cases of False Confessions to Murder of a Family Member
Coercion, Trauma, and Grief in the Interrogation Room: Documenting and Analyzing Cases of False Confessions to Murder of a Family Member
This article examines the phenomenon of false confessions in cases in which individuals were falsely accused of murdering close family members. Drawing on a dataset of twenty-two p...
Augustine’s Confessions as Autobiography
Augustine’s Confessions as Autobiography
This chapter explores the Confessions of Augustine of Hippo. Almost every author who writes on Augustine’s Confessions feels an obligation to insist that this difficult and complex...
Confessions
Confessions
Abstract
This chapter explores one of the oldest, most persuasive, and routinely problematic forms of judicial evidence: the accused’s confession. The common sense a...
Newgate Novels, Confessions of a Thug and the Narrative of Oriental Criminality
Newgate Novels, Confessions of a Thug and the Narrative of Oriental Criminality
In this paper, the author compares the novel Confessions of a Thug (1839), written by a colonial official named Philip Meadows Taylor, with Newgate novels in general and the novel ...
Competence to Confess
Competence to Confess
AbstractConfessional evidence typically is highly persuasive in criminal trials, especially when it is the primary source of evidence offered by the prosecution. Prior to obtaining...
Two Recently Confirmed False Confessions: Byron A. Halsey and Jeffrey M. Deskovic
Two Recently Confirmed False Confessions: Byron A. Halsey and Jeffrey M. Deskovic
In the past decade “false confessions” have emerged as a major area of research and practice in forensic psychology and psychiatry. Most prominent among the factors for this emerge...
Confessions Without Consequence: The Case for Attorney General Deference
Confessions Without Consequence: The Case for Attorney General Deference
<p>When the Oklahoma Attorney General confessed error in <em>Glossip v. Oklahoma</em>, acknowledging constitutional violations that tainted Richard Glossip's capi...

