Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Understanding pro-environmental behavior: A comparative analysis of rural and urban communities for environmental education and conservation
View through CrossRef
Background: Environmental degradation and climate change have become global concerns, driven by human activities such as the exploitation of natural resources. However, humans also play a crucial role in mitigating environmental damage through pro-environmental behavior. This behavior involves actions aimed at minimizing negative environmental impacts, which contribute to improving environmental quality. An individual’s affective connection with their social group and place of residence influences their pro-environmental behavior. The study compares pro-environmental behavior in urban and rural communities, focusing on the differences in driving factors across these settings. Methods: A literature review method was employed to gather data from 13 accredited articles discussing pro-environmental behavior in urban and rural communities across Asia, Europe, and America. The literature was sourced from scientific databases, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of the existing research on the topic. Findings: Both urban and rural communities engage in pro-environmental behaviors, but the factors driving these behaviors differ. Rural communities tend to have stronger social bonds and a closer connection to the natural environment, which influences their pro-environmental actions. Urban communities, on the other hand, have greater knowledge of environmental issues but often show skepticism regarding others' ability to protect the environment. Differences in pro-environmental behavior are influenced by sociodemographic, cultural, and geographical conditions. Conclusion: Pro-environmental behavior varies between rural and urban communities due to different social, cultural, and geographical factors. Understanding these differences can help develop targeted strategies to encourage environmentally conscious actions in both settings. Novelty/Originality of this article: This study provides a comparative analysis of pro-environmental behavior in rural and urban communities across diverse regions, highlighting how sociodemographic, cultural, and geographical conditions influence environmental actions. This perspective has been less extensively addressed in previous research.
Institute for Advanced Science, Social, and Sustainable Future
Title: Understanding pro-environmental behavior: A comparative analysis of rural and urban communities for environmental education and conservation
Description:
Background: Environmental degradation and climate change have become global concerns, driven by human activities such as the exploitation of natural resources.
However, humans also play a crucial role in mitigating environmental damage through pro-environmental behavior.
This behavior involves actions aimed at minimizing negative environmental impacts, which contribute to improving environmental quality.
An individual’s affective connection with their social group and place of residence influences their pro-environmental behavior.
The study compares pro-environmental behavior in urban and rural communities, focusing on the differences in driving factors across these settings.
Methods: A literature review method was employed to gather data from 13 accredited articles discussing pro-environmental behavior in urban and rural communities across Asia, Europe, and America.
The literature was sourced from scientific databases, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of the existing research on the topic.
Findings: Both urban and rural communities engage in pro-environmental behaviors, but the factors driving these behaviors differ.
Rural communities tend to have stronger social bonds and a closer connection to the natural environment, which influences their pro-environmental actions.
Urban communities, on the other hand, have greater knowledge of environmental issues but often show skepticism regarding others' ability to protect the environment.
Differences in pro-environmental behavior are influenced by sociodemographic, cultural, and geographical conditions.
Conclusion: Pro-environmental behavior varies between rural and urban communities due to different social, cultural, and geographical factors.
Understanding these differences can help develop targeted strategies to encourage environmentally conscious actions in both settings.
Novelty/Originality of this article: This study provides a comparative analysis of pro-environmental behavior in rural and urban communities across diverse regions, highlighting how sociodemographic, cultural, and geographical conditions influence environmental actions.
This perspective has been less extensively addressed in previous research.
Related Results
Macroeconomic and Social Precursors of Suicide Rates in the Philippines: A Quantitative Analysis (Preprint)
Macroeconomic and Social Precursors of Suicide Rates in the Philippines: A Quantitative Analysis (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
Suicide is a complex, serious and multifaceted public health issue that poses significant challenges to societies worldwide. In fact, it represen...
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Potable Water Sources, Household Hygiene, and Sanitation Practices in Ikpoba Okha LGA, Edo State: Implications for Public Health and Sustainable Water Management
Omoregie, Andrew Edosa.1 Omoregie Abieyuwa Peace2 Okoro, Enyinnaya Okoro.3
1 College of Medi
Potable Water Sources, Household Hygiene, and Sanitation Practices in Ikpoba Okha LGA, Edo State: Implications for Public Health and Sustainable Water Management
Omoregie, Andrew Edosa.1 Omoregie Abieyuwa Peace2 Okoro, Enyinnaya Okoro.3
1 College of Medi
BACKGROUND
Access to potable drinking water and sufficient sanitation continues to be an urgent global concern, particularly in developing regions where con...
Burden of the Beast
Burden of the Beast
Introduction
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and its fluctuating waves of infections and the emergence of new variants, Indigenous populations in Australia and worldwide have re...
Territories -in- between
Territories -in- between
There is an increasing body of literature suggesting that the conventional idea of a gradual transition in spatial structure from urban to rural does not properly reflect contempor...
A Comparative Study to Assess the Knowledge and Practices of Adults Towards use of Latrine Among Rural and Urban Area
A Comparative Study to Assess the Knowledge and Practices of Adults Towards use of Latrine Among Rural and Urban Area
One of the biggest challenges in making the country Open Defecation Free is triggering behavioral changes in the population to accept the need for building and using toilets, in re...
GEOSPATIAL ASPECTS OF FINANCIAL CAPACITY OF TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES OF TERNOPIL REGION
GEOSPATIAL ASPECTS OF FINANCIAL CAPACITY OF TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES OF TERNOPIL REGION
In the article geospatial aspects of the financial capacity of territorial communities of Ternopil region are described. The need to conduct such a study has been updated, since no...
Implementasi Pembelajaran IPS Sebagai Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter di Sekolah Dasar
Implementasi Pembelajaran IPS Sebagai Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter di Sekolah Dasar
This study aims to analyze the implementation of social studies learning as strengthening character education in elementary schools. The research method used is a qualitative descr...

