Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Load Bearing Capacity of Cohesive-Frictional Soils Reinforced with Full-Wraparound Geotextiles: Experimental and Numerical Investigation
View through CrossRef
This research investigated the effects of types of cohesive-frictional soil and geotextile reinforcement configurations on the bearing capacity of reinforced soil foundation (RSF) structures, via laboratory test and numerical simulation. The four reinforcement configurations studied for the RSF included: (i) horizontal planar form of geotextile, (ii) full-wraparound ends of geotextile, (iii) full-wraparound ends of geotextile with filled-in sand, and (iv) full-wraparound ends of geotextile with filled-in sand and sand backfill. The foundation soils studied were mixtures of fine sand and sodium bentonite at replacement ratios of 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100% by dry weight of sand to have various values of plasticity index (PI). The numerical analysis of RSF structures was performed using PLAXIS 2D software. Several factors were studied, which included: embedment depth of the top reinforcement layer (U), width of horizontal planar form of the reinforcement (W), and spacing between geotextile reinforcement layers (H). Number of reinforcement layers (N) was varied to determine the optimum parameters of U/B, W/B, H/B, and N, where B is the footing width. The most effective improvement technique was found for the full wraparound ends of geotextile with filled-in sand and sand backfill. The outcome of this research will provide a preliminary guideline in a design of RSF structure with different ground soils and other RSF structures with different geosynthetic types.
Title: Load Bearing Capacity of Cohesive-Frictional Soils Reinforced with Full-Wraparound Geotextiles: Experimental and Numerical Investigation
Description:
This research investigated the effects of types of cohesive-frictional soil and geotextile reinforcement configurations on the bearing capacity of reinforced soil foundation (RSF) structures, via laboratory test and numerical simulation.
The four reinforcement configurations studied for the RSF included: (i) horizontal planar form of geotextile, (ii) full-wraparound ends of geotextile, (iii) full-wraparound ends of geotextile with filled-in sand, and (iv) full-wraparound ends of geotextile with filled-in sand and sand backfill.
The foundation soils studied were mixtures of fine sand and sodium bentonite at replacement ratios of 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100% by dry weight of sand to have various values of plasticity index (PI).
The numerical analysis of RSF structures was performed using PLAXIS 2D software.
Several factors were studied, which included: embedment depth of the top reinforcement layer (U), width of horizontal planar form of the reinforcement (W), and spacing between geotextile reinforcement layers (H).
Number of reinforcement layers (N) was varied to determine the optimum parameters of U/B, W/B, H/B, and N, where B is the footing width.
The most effective improvement technique was found for the full wraparound ends of geotextile with filled-in sand and sand backfill.
The outcome of this research will provide a preliminary guideline in a design of RSF structure with different ground soils and other RSF structures with different geosynthetic types.
Related Results
Sustainable Soil Bearing Capacity Improvement Using Natural Limited Life Geotextile Reinforcement—A Review
Sustainable Soil Bearing Capacity Improvement Using Natural Limited Life Geotextile Reinforcement—A Review
Geotextiles are commercially made from synthetic fibres and have been used to enhance bearing capacity and to reduce the settlement of weak soil foundations. Several efforts have b...
The Wraparound Approach
The Wraparound Approach
AbstractThis chapter focuses on a wraparound approach for children displaying emotional disorders. It discusses the wraparound theory of change and wraparound intervention paramete...
Improvement of seismic performance of ordinary reinforced partially grouted concrete masonry shear walls
Improvement of seismic performance of ordinary reinforced partially grouted concrete masonry shear walls
Reinforced masonry constitutes about 10% of all low-rise construction in the US. Most of these structures are commercial and school buildings. It may also be used for multi-story h...
Influence of metal ions on the oxidation resistance of polypropylene geotextiles
Influence of metal ions on the oxidation resistance of polypropylene geotextiles
Like other polymeric materials, geotextiles may degrade through oxidation, potentially affecting their performance and lifespan. In certain applications (e.g. mining sites or waste...
Study on the mechanical properties of clayey slip zone soil considering montmorillonite content
Study on the mechanical properties of clayey slip zone soil considering montmorillonite content
Abstract
The strength property of slip zone soil determines the evolution mechanism and deformation damage of landslides. When the slip zone soil contains a certain amount ...
Numerical Modeling on the Compliance and Load Capacity of a Two-Row Aerostatic Journal Bearing with Longitudinal Microgrooves in the Inter-Row Zone
Numerical Modeling on the Compliance and Load Capacity of a Two-Row Aerostatic Journal Bearing with Longitudinal Microgrooves in the Inter-Row Zone
Aerostatic bearings are attractive, with minimal friction losses, high durability, and environmental friendliness. However, such designs have a number of disadvantages, including l...
A multi-axial tension test for geotextiles
A multi-axial tension test for geotextiles
The use of geotextiles as reinforcement is well-established in geotechnical applications. However, some uses of these materials occur in geotechnical systems where the in situ load...
Properties and Management of Smectitic Soils
Properties and Management of Smectitic Soils
Smectitic soils of the tropics are medium- to fine-textured alluvial soils containing moderate to large amounts (20% or more) of smectite, a shrinking and swelling clay mineral, in...

