Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Cathepsin K inhibitors promote osteoclast-osteoblast communication and engagement of osteogenesis

View through CrossRef
ABSTRACTCathepsin K inhibitors are well known for their inhibitory activity against bone resorption but, in contrast with other bone resorption antagonists, were also reported to preserve bone formation in clinical trials. Here we show cathepsin K inhibitors favor the crosstalk between osteoclasts and osteoblasts and help engaging the osteogenic process required for proper bone remodeling. Therefore, we used a novel approach, co-culturing human osteoclasts and osteoblast lineage cells on bone slices and monitored through time-lapse their response to an active site (odanacatib) or an ectosteric (T06) cathepsin K inhibitor. Both inhibitors prevent the shift from pit to trench resorption mode and thus lead to a marked increase in pit-eroded surface lined with undigested collagen. Importantly, pit-eroded surfaces prove to receive significantly more and longer visits of osteoblast lineage cells. Furthermore, resorption achieved under CatK inhibition promotes osteoblast differentiation as shown by upregulation of alkaline phosphatase and type 1 collagen, and down regulation of RANKL. We propose a model where high cathepsin K activity levels lead to both aggressive bone resorption and compromised bone formation, and where low cathepsin K levels result in both slower resorption and faster initiation of formation. This model fits the current knowledge on the effect of collagen/collagenolysis on osteoclast activity and osteoblast chemotaxis. The combined effects of cathepsin K on resorption and formation render cathepsin K inhibitors unique tools to prevent bone loss. They stress the clinical interest of developing ectosteric inhibitors that may limit the side effects of active site inhibitors.LAY SUMMARYSmall bone packages are continuously degraded by osteoclast cells and reconstructed by osteoblast cells. Too much degradation or too little reconstruction leads to bone loss and is currently treated with inhibitors of degradation or stimulators of reconstruction. There is usually little attention for the mechanism maintaining the balance between degradation and reconstruction. This mechanism involves proper communication between osteoclasts and osteoblasts. Here we show that cathepsin K inhibitors developed to inhibit degradation, also favor osteoclast-osteoblast communication, thereby allowing a faster preparation of degraded bone surfaces for new bone deposition. This highlights the unique clinical potential of cathepsin K inhibitors.
Title: Cathepsin K inhibitors promote osteoclast-osteoblast communication and engagement of osteogenesis
Description:
ABSTRACTCathepsin K inhibitors are well known for their inhibitory activity against bone resorption but, in contrast with other bone resorption antagonists, were also reported to preserve bone formation in clinical trials.
Here we show cathepsin K inhibitors favor the crosstalk between osteoclasts and osteoblasts and help engaging the osteogenic process required for proper bone remodeling.
Therefore, we used a novel approach, co-culturing human osteoclasts and osteoblast lineage cells on bone slices and monitored through time-lapse their response to an active site (odanacatib) or an ectosteric (T06) cathepsin K inhibitor.
Both inhibitors prevent the shift from pit to trench resorption mode and thus lead to a marked increase in pit-eroded surface lined with undigested collagen.
Importantly, pit-eroded surfaces prove to receive significantly more and longer visits of osteoblast lineage cells.
Furthermore, resorption achieved under CatK inhibition promotes osteoblast differentiation as shown by upregulation of alkaline phosphatase and type 1 collagen, and down regulation of RANKL.
We propose a model where high cathepsin K activity levels lead to both aggressive bone resorption and compromised bone formation, and where low cathepsin K levels result in both slower resorption and faster initiation of formation.
This model fits the current knowledge on the effect of collagen/collagenolysis on osteoclast activity and osteoblast chemotaxis.
The combined effects of cathepsin K on resorption and formation render cathepsin K inhibitors unique tools to prevent bone loss.
They stress the clinical interest of developing ectosteric inhibitors that may limit the side effects of active site inhibitors.
LAY SUMMARYSmall bone packages are continuously degraded by osteoclast cells and reconstructed by osteoblast cells.
Too much degradation or too little reconstruction leads to bone loss and is currently treated with inhibitors of degradation or stimulators of reconstruction.
There is usually little attention for the mechanism maintaining the balance between degradation and reconstruction.
This mechanism involves proper communication between osteoclasts and osteoblasts.
Here we show that cathepsin K inhibitors developed to inhibit degradation, also favor osteoclast-osteoblast communication, thereby allowing a faster preparation of degraded bone surfaces for new bone deposition.
This highlights the unique clinical potential of cathepsin K inhibitors.

Related Results

Cathepsin K inhibitors promote osteoclast-osteoblast communication and engagement of osteogenesis
Cathepsin K inhibitors promote osteoclast-osteoblast communication and engagement of osteogenesis
Abstract Cathepsin K inhibitors are well known for their inhibitory activity against bone resorption but were also reported to preserve bone formation in clinical tr...
Cathepsin H (EC 3.4.22.16)
Cathepsin H (EC 3.4.22.16)
Abstract In 1976 Kirschke and co-workers [169] named a lysosomal peptidase cathepsin H. This enzyme was termed L20C21 in 1972 by the same authors [340] and later cat...
Downregulation of the metalloproteinases ADAM10 or ADAM17 promotes osteoclast differentiation
Downregulation of the metalloproteinases ADAM10 or ADAM17 promotes osteoclast differentiation
AbstractBone resorption is driven through osteoclast differentiation by macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand (RANKL)...
Cathepsin B (EC 3.4.22.1)
Cathepsin B (EC 3.4.22.1)
Abstract In 1941 Fruton and co-workers [1377] proposed a classification of the proteolytic enzymes of animal tissues in which they included an enzyme that hydrolysed...
Inhibition of Tumorigenicity and Metastasis of Human Melanoma Cells by Anti-Cathepsin L Single Chain Variable Fragment
Inhibition of Tumorigenicity and Metastasis of Human Melanoma Cells by Anti-Cathepsin L Single Chain Variable Fragment
Abstract We demonstrated previously that the switch from nonmetastatic to highly metastatic phenotype of human melanoma cells is directly related to secretion of pro...
Cathepsin S (EC 3.4.22.27)
Cathepsin S (EC 3.4.22.27)
Abstract In 1975 the name cathepsin S was given to a cysteine peptidase purified from bovine lymph nodes by Turnsek and co-workers [402] and in 1981 from spleen by L...
Extraction and Characterization of Cathepsin Inhibitor from Milkfish
Extraction and Characterization of Cathepsin Inhibitor from Milkfish
Proteolytic enzyme is distributed acros all organism including fish. Cysteine proteases are the largest group of proteolytic enzyme. Lysosomal cathepsin, one of cysteine protease e...

Back to Top