Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Partisan Punitive Practice in Varėna District (1944–1952)

View through CrossRef
One of the least analysed aspects of the partisan war in Lithuania between 1944 and 1953 is the punitive practice of partisans. The aim of Total Irreversible Human Loss in Lithuania Between 1944 and 1953, a programme conducted by the Special Investigation Department of the Genocide and Resistance Research Centre of Lithuania, is to explore in detail the relationship between the partisans and the population during the war, to reveal the variety of executions conducted by partisans, and to clarify the decision-making procedures of partisan organisations with respect to the population. The objectives of the programme are to carry out a complex historical-statistical study and to prepare a classification of cases and a statistical data set; to collect data on the relationship of partisan organisations with the population and on the activities of courts-martial and other partisan institutions; and to carry out historical and legal analysis of data and to assess the legitimacy, validity and effects of partisan decisions concerning the population. It is also necessary to clarify, supplement and correct errors in the Soviet era card files that are stored at the Genocide and Resistance Research Centre and serve as the database for people killed and injured by partisans. This article has been prepared on the basis of the study of death sentences, executions, and people killed in action by partisans in the period 1944–1952 in the district of Varėna, the area of former Varėna County. During the archival-historiographic study, cases of killings were examined in detail through the exploration of the circumstances, motives, and other information. An important part of the study was the analysis of partisan documents: court-martial reports, various proclamations, and warnings. The most serious areas of the punitive practices of partisans were also discussed: killings of families or minors, issues of guilt and innocence, and the circumstances of partisan warfare at the time. Between 1944 and 1952, 688 people were killed in the district of Varėna; a total of 858 recorded cases of executions or possible executions were studied. The social status of 497 victims and dates of birth of 443 victims were identified. The average age of victims was 35.6 years. Three main categories of victims can be identified: employees and officers of military and security forces (29.6%), Soviet administrative staff and employees (20.9%), and farmers and workers (a total of 30.6%; 22.1% and 8.5% respectively). Other categories by job, occupation, etc.: family members of employees of military and security organisations (2%), family members of administrative staff (4.8%), settlers (3%), informers and agents (3.2%), Soviet activists (2.8%), family members of activists (0.2%), members of Komsomol (0.8%), students (0.2%), and former partisans and people who were close to them (1.8%). Eighty convictions by partisan courts-martial were identified, and 23 other partisan documents (warnings, proclamations) were left at the places of execution. This accounts for 14.9% of all executions. Most soldiers, employees and officers of military and security forces perished or were executed in an ambush. The justification for killing Soviet administrative officials, employees, and other staff members was usually that those people were carrying out Soviet orders. Usually executions were carried out at people’s homes or outside homes and by giving a warning and providing a charge. Death penalties and executions of farmers and workers pose the most questions. Most are executions for collaboration with the Soviets and the sabotage of the partisan movement. Based on the information collected, it is however usually difficult to fully assess the legitimacy of such killings.  
Genocide and Resistance Research Centre of Lithuania
Title: Partisan Punitive Practice in Varėna District (1944–1952)
Description:
One of the least analysed aspects of the partisan war in Lithuania between 1944 and 1953 is the punitive practice of partisans.
The aim of Total Irreversible Human Loss in Lithuania Between 1944 and 1953, a programme conducted by the Special Investigation Department of the Genocide and Resistance Research Centre of Lithuania, is to explore in detail the relationship between the partisans and the population during the war, to reveal the variety of executions conducted by partisans, and to clarify the decision-making procedures of partisan organisations with respect to the population.
The objectives of the programme are to carry out a complex historical-statistical study and to prepare a classification of cases and a statistical data set; to collect data on the relationship of partisan organisations with the population and on the activities of courts-martial and other partisan institutions; and to carry out historical and legal analysis of data and to assess the legitimacy, validity and effects of partisan decisions concerning the population.
It is also necessary to clarify, supplement and correct errors in the Soviet era card files that are stored at the Genocide and Resistance Research Centre and serve as the database for people killed and injured by partisans.
This article has been prepared on the basis of the study of death sentences, executions, and people killed in action by partisans in the period 1944–1952 in the district of Varėna, the area of former Varėna County.
During the archival-historiographic study, cases of killings were examined in detail through the exploration of the circumstances, motives, and other information.
An important part of the study was the analysis of partisan documents: court-martial reports, various proclamations, and warnings.
The most serious areas of the punitive practices of partisans were also discussed: killings of families or minors, issues of guilt and innocence, and the circumstances of partisan warfare at the time.
Between 1944 and 1952, 688 people were killed in the district of Varėna; a total of 858 recorded cases of executions or possible executions were studied.
The social status of 497 victims and dates of birth of 443 victims were identified.
The average age of victims was 35.
6 years.
Three main categories of victims can be identified: employees and officers of military and security forces (29.
6%), Soviet administrative staff and employees (20.
9%), and farmers and workers (a total of 30.
6%; 22.
1% and 8.
5% respectively).
Other categories by job, occupation, etc.
: family members of employees of military and security organisations (2%), family members of administrative staff (4.
8%), settlers (3%), informers and agents (3.
2%), Soviet activists (2.
8%), family members of activists (0.
2%), members of Komsomol (0.
8%), students (0.
2%), and former partisans and people who were close to them (1.
8%).
Eighty convictions by partisan courts-martial were identified, and 23 other partisan documents (warnings, proclamations) were left at the places of execution.
This accounts for 14.
9% of all executions.
Most soldiers, employees and officers of military and security forces perished or were executed in an ambush.
The justification for killing Soviet administrative officials, employees, and other staff members was usually that those people were carrying out Soviet orders.
Usually executions were carried out at people’s homes or outside homes and by giving a warning and providing a charge.
Death penalties and executions of farmers and workers pose the most questions.
Most are executions for collaboration with the Soviets and the sabotage of the partisan movement.
Based on the information collected, it is however usually difficult to fully assess the legitimacy of such killings.
 .

Related Results

Punitive Damages: Should Juries Decide?
Punitive Damages: Should Juries Decide?
How Juries Decide is a pathbreaking work of empirical scholarship based on experiments conducted with more than 8,000 jury-eligible citizens and more than 600 mock juries. Its basi...
Punitive Operations Carried out by Lithuanian Partisans in Alytus County in 1944–1952
Punitive Operations Carried out by Lithuanian Partisans in Alytus County in 1944–1952
To compare with guerrilla wars in the 20th century in Europe, participants of Lithuanian partisan movement after the WW II were particularly involved in fighting collaborationism; ...
Partisan Campaigns, Ballots, and Voting Patterns
Partisan Campaigns, Ballots, and Voting Patterns
This article uses the unique election history of Charlotte, North Carolina, to study the effects of ballot and campaign types. Charlotte had a nonpartisan campaign and ballot in 19...
Penal practices of partisans in the Kaunas Region (1944–1952). Part II
Penal practices of partisans in the Kaunas Region (1944–1952). Part II
Part 1 of this Article analyses campaigns of the partisans in Kaunas county and Kaunas city that took place in 1944-1945. Kaunas county geographically was a midpoint of Lithuania, ...
Punitive Damages for Environmental Public Welfare: An Empirical StudyofLegal Attributes and Attribution
Punitive Damages for Environmental Public Welfare: An Empirical StudyofLegal Attributes and Attribution
As an important legal mechanism of local social governance, punitive damages forenvironmental public welfare can have a certain deterrent effect on regional environmentaldamage, so...
Punitive Damages in Unfair Dismissal Cases: Lessons from Malaysia and New Zealand
Punitive Damages in Unfair Dismissal Cases: Lessons from Malaysia and New Zealand
Employers tend to dismiss employees without proper grounds, in bad faith or fail to follow procedure prescribed under law. An employee that has been dismissed unfairly can bring an...
The ‘Left Errors’ and the Partisan Crisis, c. February–June 1942
The ‘Left Errors’ and the Partisan Crisis, c. February–June 1942
The policy pursued by the KPJ and Partisan leadership in the period of the Foca Republic marked a step away from a Serb-oriented resistance strategy, towards one that was genuinely...
Constructive Gridlock
Constructive Gridlock
Critics of President Trump have alleged that he has reduced independent agencies to mere extensions of the executive branch during his second term. The reality is that Democratic a...

Back to Top