Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Efficacy and Accuracy of Maxillary Arch Expansion with Clear Aligner Treatment

View through CrossRef
The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficacy and accuracy of maxillary arch transverse expansion using the Invisalign® clear aligner system without auxiliaries other than Invisalign attachments. Knowing the accuracy of a movement through a clear aligner system allows the clinician to plan the treatment with greater precision and to achieve the expected result faster. The study group included 28 patients with a mean age of 17 ± 3.2 years. The treatment protocol for all the selected patients included the application of the Invisalign® clear aligner system without auxiliaries, except for the Invisalign® attachments; in no case were tooth extraction or interproximal enamel reduction (IPR) performed. Linear measurements of the expansion were assessed before treatment (T0), at the end of treatment (T1), and on final virtual models by ClinCheck® (TC). A paired t-test was used to compare T0-T1 and T1-TC differences. A paired t-test was applied, and one normality was validated with the Shapiro–Wilks test. If normality was not met, the nonparametric test (Mann–Whitney U test) was applied. The level of significance was set at 5%. Statistically significant differences were found for all measurements at T0-T1. The results showed an average accuracy of efficacy of 70.88%. The differences in predictability between the various vestibular measurements (intercanine, inter-premolar, and intermolar) were not statistically significant, while they were for gingival measurements. The overall accuracy of the expansion treatment was 70%, regardless of tooth type.
Title: Efficacy and Accuracy of Maxillary Arch Expansion with Clear Aligner Treatment
Description:
The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficacy and accuracy of maxillary arch transverse expansion using the Invisalign® clear aligner system without auxiliaries other than Invisalign attachments.
Knowing the accuracy of a movement through a clear aligner system allows the clinician to plan the treatment with greater precision and to achieve the expected result faster.
The study group included 28 patients with a mean age of 17 ± 3.
2 years.
The treatment protocol for all the selected patients included the application of the Invisalign® clear aligner system without auxiliaries, except for the Invisalign® attachments; in no case were tooth extraction or interproximal enamel reduction (IPR) performed.
Linear measurements of the expansion were assessed before treatment (T0), at the end of treatment (T1), and on final virtual models by ClinCheck® (TC).
A paired t-test was used to compare T0-T1 and T1-TC differences.
A paired t-test was applied, and one normality was validated with the Shapiro–Wilks test.
If normality was not met, the nonparametric test (Mann–Whitney U test) was applied.
The level of significance was set at 5%.
Statistically significant differences were found for all measurements at T0-T1.
The results showed an average accuracy of efficacy of 70.
88%.
The differences in predictability between the various vestibular measurements (intercanine, inter-premolar, and intermolar) were not statistically significant, while they were for gingival measurements.
The overall accuracy of the expansion treatment was 70%, regardless of tooth type.

Related Results

Risk Factors of Composite Attachment Loss During Orthodontic Clear Aligner Therapy
Risk Factors of Composite Attachment Loss During Orthodontic Clear Aligner Therapy
Abstract Background The composite attachment loss during orthodontic clear aligner therapy is an adverse event that commonly happens in our daily practice. However, there i...
Risk Factors of Composite Attachment Loss in Orthodontic Patients during Orthodontic Clear Aligner Therapy: A Prospective Study
Risk Factors of Composite Attachment Loss in Orthodontic Patients during Orthodontic Clear Aligner Therapy: A Prospective Study
Background. The composite attachment loss during orthodontic clear aligner therapy is an adverse event that commonly happens in our daily practice. However, there is a lack of rela...
Intervention of arch support: A quantitative study
Intervention of arch support: A quantitative study
Hallux valgus is a common foot deformity characterized by hypermobility of the first metatarsal ray. The lower longitudinal arch is an intrinsic factor related to the lateral drift...
Assessment of the Relationship between Maxillary Posterior Teeth and Maxillary Sinus Using Cone‐Beam Computed Tomography
Assessment of the Relationship between Maxillary Posterior Teeth and Maxillary Sinus Using Cone‐Beam Computed Tomography
Introduction . Because of the close contact between maxillary sinus and maxillary posterior teeth, procedural errors such as perforation of the sinus may occur ...
Properties of Orthodontic Clear Aligner Materials - A Review
Properties of Orthodontic Clear Aligner Materials - A Review
BACKGROUND Clear aligners are orthodontic devices that are transparent, a plastic used to correct malaligned teeth. Here patient wears a series of customized clear, removable align...
In-plane bearing capacity analysis of concrete catenary arch with rigid skeleton: test and simulation
In-plane bearing capacity analysis of concrete catenary arch with rigid skeleton: test and simulation
Abstract Although the rigid skeleton concrete arch has been widely used in engineering, the research on the failure mode and bearing capacity of this kind of arch is very...
Slow maxillary expansion
Slow maxillary expansion
Constricted maxillary arch is one of the most common problems faced by an Orthodontist while treating young as well as adult patients. Maxillary expansion occupies a unique niche i...

Back to Top