Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A New Method for Identifying Low-Resistivity Gas Zones, High-Resistivity Water Zones, and Water-Flooded Layers Based on SP and Array Induction Resistivity
View through CrossRef
Abstract
The identification of oil, gas, water and water-flooded zones is one of the main tasks in well logging processing and interpretation, and its accuracy directly impacts hydrocarbon reservoir evaluation, reserve estimation, and development planning. Conventional fluid identification primarily relies on electrical property differences, where hydrocarbons (oil/gas) exhibit significantly higher resistivity than water zones.
With the advancement of exploration and development, the study of unconventional reservoirs such as low-resistivity gas reservoirs has become increasingly important. Compared to conventional high-resistivity gas zones, low-resistivity gas reservoirs exhibit lower resistivity, often overlapping with water zones, making traditional resistivity-based identification challenging. To address this issue, this paper proposes a rapid fluid identification method based on spontaneous potential (SP) and array induction resistivity (AT).
The workflow mainly includes the following 6 steps: 1)Investigate mud resistivity (Rmf) and formation water resistivity (Rw). 2)Compute array induction resistivity index (ATindex) to characterize resistivity differences between invaded zones and formation, enabling low-resistivity pay and high-resistivity water layer identification. 3)Derive SP index (SPindex) reflecting salinity differences to identify water-flooded zones. 4)Amplify fluid curve discrepancies and calculate fluid characterization index (Findex). 5)Establish fluid identification templates and cutoff values using 2D/3D crossplots. 6)Validate results with dynamic data for efficient fluid identification.
In the actual application at Field R in South America, this method enables rapid identification of low-resistivity gas zones, high-resistivity water layers, and water-flooded zones, with results showing strong consistency with production data. This confirms the reliability and applicability of the approach, significantly enhancing reservoir characterization and providing critical guidance for the next phase of gas field development.
Title: A New Method for Identifying Low-Resistivity Gas Zones, High-Resistivity Water Zones, and Water-Flooded Layers Based on SP and Array Induction Resistivity
Description:
Abstract
The identification of oil, gas, water and water-flooded zones is one of the main tasks in well logging processing and interpretation, and its accuracy directly impacts hydrocarbon reservoir evaluation, reserve estimation, and development planning.
Conventional fluid identification primarily relies on electrical property differences, where hydrocarbons (oil/gas) exhibit significantly higher resistivity than water zones.
With the advancement of exploration and development, the study of unconventional reservoirs such as low-resistivity gas reservoirs has become increasingly important.
Compared to conventional high-resistivity gas zones, low-resistivity gas reservoirs exhibit lower resistivity, often overlapping with water zones, making traditional resistivity-based identification challenging.
To address this issue, this paper proposes a rapid fluid identification method based on spontaneous potential (SP) and array induction resistivity (AT).
The workflow mainly includes the following 6 steps: 1)Investigate mud resistivity (Rmf) and formation water resistivity (Rw).
2)Compute array induction resistivity index (ATindex) to characterize resistivity differences between invaded zones and formation, enabling low-resistivity pay and high-resistivity water layer identification.
3)Derive SP index (SPindex) reflecting salinity differences to identify water-flooded zones.
4)Amplify fluid curve discrepancies and calculate fluid characterization index (Findex).
5)Establish fluid identification templates and cutoff values using 2D/3D crossplots.
6)Validate results with dynamic data for efficient fluid identification.
In the actual application at Field R in South America, this method enables rapid identification of low-resistivity gas zones, high-resistivity water layers, and water-flooded zones, with results showing strong consistency with production data.
This confirms the reliability and applicability of the approach, significantly enhancing reservoir characterization and providing critical guidance for the next phase of gas field development.
Related Results
AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON RESISTIVITY AND CONDUCTIVE MECHANISM IN LOW‐PERMEABILITY RESERVOIRS WITH COMPLEX WETTABILITY
AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON RESISTIVITY AND CONDUCTIVE MECHANISM IN LOW‐PERMEABILITY RESERVOIRS WITH COMPLEX WETTABILITY
AbstractAs the clay film developed in low‐permeability lithologic reservoirs absorbs oil, reservoirs become oil‐wet, which results in abnormally high resistivity oil‐water layers a...
Use of Formation Water and Associated Gases and their Simultaneous Utilization for Obtaining Microelement Concentrates Fresh Water and Drinking Water
Use of Formation Water and Associated Gases and their Simultaneous Utilization for Obtaining Microelement Concentrates Fresh Water and Drinking Water
Abstract Purpose: The invention relates to the oil industry, inorganic chemistry, in particular, to the methods of complex processing of formation water, using flare gas of oil and...
Design of a Tertiary Hydrocarbon Miscible Flood for the Mitsue Reservoir
Design of a Tertiary Hydrocarbon Miscible Flood for the Mitsue Reservoir
Summary.
A large-scale hydrocarbon miscible flood has been designed and is being conducted in the Mitsue Gilwood Sand Unit No. 1 in Alberta, Canada. The horizonta...
Outcomes Following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for AML in First Completion Remission Are Comparable between MRD Negative Patients and MRD Positive Patients Receiving Induction Only and Are Superior to MRD Positive Patients Receiving Induction and
Outcomes Following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for AML in First Completion Remission Are Comparable between MRD Negative Patients and MRD Positive Patients Receiving Induction Only and Are Superior to MRD Positive Patients Receiving Induction and
Background:
Data suggests that the presence of measurable residual disease (MRD) at the time of transplant for AML portends a poor prognosis. The timing of MRD asses...
An Integrated Approach to Calculate Vertical and Horizontal Resistivity Utilizing Conventional Logs in Low Resistivity Pay Reservoirs in Gulf of Suez: Case Study
An Integrated Approach to Calculate Vertical and Horizontal Resistivity Utilizing Conventional Logs in Low Resistivity Pay Reservoirs in Gulf of Suez: Case Study
The occurrence of Low Resistivity Pay (LRP) have been widely reported. The conventional induction resistivity log does not recognized LRP, because this phenomenon affects the conve...
Calculation of Water-Flooded Layers Oil Saturation Based on Modified Archie model
Calculation of Water-Flooded Layers Oil Saturation Based on Modified Archie model
Archie model is the basis of calculating oil saturation, but there are some limitations when using this model to calculate oil saturation in water-flooded layer. The main reason is...
An Approach to Determining Water Saturation in Shaly Sands
An Approach to Determining Water Saturation in Shaly Sands
Abstract
Fresh waters and the presence of clay in many Rocky Mountain and West Coast sands require special methods of log analysis. Archie's saturation equation r...
Study on Main Controlling Factors and Fluid Identification Methods of Low-resistivity Reservoirs based on BP Nerve Network Verification in X Area of Ordos Basin
Study on Main Controlling Factors and Fluid Identification Methods of Low-resistivity Reservoirs based on BP Nerve Network Verification in X Area of Ordos Basin
The low-resistivity oil layers refer to a formation whose resistivity response is opposite to the typical oil layers and similar to water layer. Distinguishing it from water layer ...

