Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A New Method for Identifying Low-Resistivity Gas Zones, High-Resistivity Water Zones, and Water-Flooded Layers Based on SP and Array Induction Resistivity

View through CrossRef
Abstract The identification of oil, gas, water and water-flooded zones is one of the main tasks in well logging processing and interpretation, and its accuracy directly impacts hydrocarbon reservoir evaluation, reserve estimation, and development planning. Conventional fluid identification primarily relies on electrical property differences, where hydrocarbons (oil/gas) exhibit significantly higher resistivity than water zones. With the advancement of exploration and development, the study of unconventional reservoirs such as low-resistivity gas reservoirs has become increasingly important. Compared to conventional high-resistivity gas zones, low-resistivity gas reservoirs exhibit lower resistivity, often overlapping with water zones, making traditional resistivity-based identification challenging. To address this issue, this paper proposes a rapid fluid identification method based on spontaneous potential (SP) and array induction resistivity (AT). The workflow mainly includes the following 6 steps: 1)Investigate mud resistivity (Rmf) and formation water resistivity (Rw). 2)Compute array induction resistivity index (ATindex) to characterize resistivity differences between invaded zones and formation, enabling low-resistivity pay and high-resistivity water layer identification. 3)Derive SP index (SPindex) reflecting salinity differences to identify water-flooded zones. 4)Amplify fluid curve discrepancies and calculate fluid characterization index (Findex). 5)Establish fluid identification templates and cutoff values using 2D/3D crossplots. 6)Validate results with dynamic data for efficient fluid identification. In the actual application at Field R in South America, this method enables rapid identification of low-resistivity gas zones, high-resistivity water layers, and water-flooded zones, with results showing strong consistency with production data. This confirms the reliability and applicability of the approach, significantly enhancing reservoir characterization and providing critical guidance for the next phase of gas field development.
Title: A New Method for Identifying Low-Resistivity Gas Zones, High-Resistivity Water Zones, and Water-Flooded Layers Based on SP and Array Induction Resistivity
Description:
Abstract The identification of oil, gas, water and water-flooded zones is one of the main tasks in well logging processing and interpretation, and its accuracy directly impacts hydrocarbon reservoir evaluation, reserve estimation, and development planning.
Conventional fluid identification primarily relies on electrical property differences, where hydrocarbons (oil/gas) exhibit significantly higher resistivity than water zones.
With the advancement of exploration and development, the study of unconventional reservoirs such as low-resistivity gas reservoirs has become increasingly important.
Compared to conventional high-resistivity gas zones, low-resistivity gas reservoirs exhibit lower resistivity, often overlapping with water zones, making traditional resistivity-based identification challenging.
To address this issue, this paper proposes a rapid fluid identification method based on spontaneous potential (SP) and array induction resistivity (AT).
The workflow mainly includes the following 6 steps: 1)Investigate mud resistivity (Rmf) and formation water resistivity (Rw).
2)Compute array induction resistivity index (ATindex) to characterize resistivity differences between invaded zones and formation, enabling low-resistivity pay and high-resistivity water layer identification.
3)Derive SP index (SPindex) reflecting salinity differences to identify water-flooded zones.
4)Amplify fluid curve discrepancies and calculate fluid characterization index (Findex).
5)Establish fluid identification templates and cutoff values using 2D/3D crossplots.
6)Validate results with dynamic data for efficient fluid identification.
In the actual application at Field R in South America, this method enables rapid identification of low-resistivity gas zones, high-resistivity water layers, and water-flooded zones, with results showing strong consistency with production data.
This confirms the reliability and applicability of the approach, significantly enhancing reservoir characterization and providing critical guidance for the next phase of gas field development.

Related Results

AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON RESISTIVITY AND CONDUCTIVE MECHANISM IN LOW‐PERMEABILITY RESERVOIRS WITH COMPLEX WETTABILITY
AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON RESISTIVITY AND CONDUCTIVE MECHANISM IN LOW‐PERMEABILITY RESERVOIRS WITH COMPLEX WETTABILITY
AbstractAs the clay film developed in low‐permeability lithologic reservoirs absorbs oil, reservoirs become oil‐wet, which results in abnormally high resistivity oil‐water layers a...
Design of a Tertiary Hydrocarbon Miscible Flood for the Mitsue Reservoir
Design of a Tertiary Hydrocarbon Miscible Flood for the Mitsue Reservoir
Summary. A large-scale hydrocarbon miscible flood has been designed and is being conducted in the Mitsue Gilwood Sand Unit No. 1 in Alberta, Canada. The horizonta...
Calculation of Water-Flooded Layers Oil Saturation Based on Modified Archie model
Calculation of Water-Flooded Layers Oil Saturation Based on Modified Archie model
Archie model is the basis of calculating oil saturation, but there are some limitations when using this model to calculate oil saturation in water-flooded layer. The main reason is...
An Approach to Determining Water Saturation in Shaly Sands
An Approach to Determining Water Saturation in Shaly Sands
Abstract Fresh waters and the presence of clay in many Rocky Mountain and West Coast sands require special methods of log analysis. Archie's saturation equation r...

Back to Top