Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Transitional Figures: Hugo Grotius, Thomas Hobbes, Samuel Pufendorf

View through CrossRef
In the classical age, everything finds its place in a class of things; all classes are ordered; taxonomy represents the order of the world. Discussion of space exemplifies the transition to the world as a table. Descartes and Leibniz advanced a relational conception of space, while Newton held space to function as a container. This transition in conditions of thought affected the way people thought about the “person” who rules and is subject to rule. While Hugo Grotius’s De jure belli ac pacis conveys a Renaissance sensibility, it adapts a medieval-Aristotelian stance on human faculties to suit moral persons, including political bodies. Pufendorf furthered the Grotian position by positing the natural equality of human beings and working out the idea that rights among equals imply correlative duties. In Leviathan, Hobbes located “artificial persons” in an equally artificial setting to illustrate the logic of rule over territory as a contained space.
Title: Transitional Figures: Hugo Grotius, Thomas Hobbes, Samuel Pufendorf
Description:
In the classical age, everything finds its place in a class of things; all classes are ordered; taxonomy represents the order of the world.
Discussion of space exemplifies the transition to the world as a table.
Descartes and Leibniz advanced a relational conception of space, while Newton held space to function as a container.
This transition in conditions of thought affected the way people thought about the “person” who rules and is subject to rule.
While Hugo Grotius’s De jure belli ac pacis conveys a Renaissance sensibility, it adapts a medieval-Aristotelian stance on human faculties to suit moral persons, including political bodies.
Pufendorf furthered the Grotian position by positing the natural equality of human beings and working out the idea that rights among equals imply correlative duties.
In Leviathan, Hobbes located “artificial persons” in an equally artificial setting to illustrate the logic of rule over territory as a contained space.

Related Results

11. Hugo Grotius
11. Hugo Grotius
This chapter examines Hugo Grotius' key political ideas. Grotius, one of the most prolific and erudite writers of the seventeenth century, sought to formulate a set of universal ri...
Hobbes on Sex
Hobbes on Sex
Abstract Contemporary scholars have largely dismissed Hobbes’s brief, and somewhat scattered, remarks about gender and sexuality as peripheral to his central concern...
Hobbes on Justice
Hobbes on Justice
Abstract Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679) is widely regarded as one of the most important political thinkers in the western tradition. Justice is one of the main political ...
Hobbes's Theory of Will
Hobbes's Theory of Will
In Hobbes's Theory of the Will, Jurgen Overhoff reveals the religious, ethical, and political consequences of Thomas Hobbes's doctrine of volition. The author gracefully describes ...
Freitas Versus Grotius (1959)
Freitas Versus Grotius (1959)
This chapter considers the work of Franciscus Seraphin de Freitas, a professor at the University of Valadolid, in particular his treatise entitled De Justo Imperio Lusitanorum Asia...
Grotius and India (1954)
Grotius and India (1954)
This chapter discusses the work of two European writers who made outstanding contributions to the formation of the law of nations: Franciscus de Vitoria, professor at the Universit...
Mosaic Leviathan
Mosaic Leviathan
This chapter defends three connected claims. First, we can account for Hobbes’s turn towards the Hebrew Bible by understanding the place of biblical Israel in the political and rel...
The Theocratic Leviathan
The Theocratic Leviathan
Hobbes’s views on church–state relations go well beyond Erastianism. Rather than claiming that the state holds supremacy over the church, Hobbes argued that church and state are id...

Back to Top