Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Analysis of safety and outcome of use of NOAC in intracardiac thrombi over warfarin
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Introduction
Intracardiac clots occur in 15- 25% of patients post myocardial infarction and in patient with atrial fibrillation. It holds poor outcome if not treated with anticoagulation. Warfarin remains the drug of choice in such patients, however recently according to the newly published data, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) has recommended non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulant (NOAC) for intracardiac clots as a class 2A recommendation. There is no documented data in the region of the gulf regarding the use of NOAC in intracardiac clots.
Aim
We aim in this study to evaluate the use of NOAC in the treatment of intracardiac clots over warfarin, by studying the effectiveness, safety and associated complications.
Methodology
A retrospective cohort study from April 2017 to December 2023 was conducted of patient’s above 18 years old who have a documented intracardiac clot on echocardiography. The patient were grouped into patients discharged on NOAC and those discharged on warfarin. The participants were studied for resolution of clot and development of complication; death, bleeding and thrombosis.
Results
A total of 253 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Out of which 45 ( 18%) patients were discharged on NOAC and 208 (82%) on warfarin. The two groups had similar demographics with equally mean age of 71 years old , 89% being males, 38% hypertensive and most common clot in the left ventricle in both groups. From those patients with documented follow up ( NOAC 45% average of 8 months, Warfarin 62% average of 7 months); 48% in the NOAC group had a documented resolution of the clot while 44% in the warfarin group had a documented resolution of the intracardiac clot.(p value of 0.7) The median resolution time in the NOAC group was 4 months while in the warfarin group 3.5 months. Bleeding occurred in 19% and mortality rate was 5% in NOAC group, while in the warfarin group 10% developed bleeding and mortality rate was 6%.
Conclusion
Our data pointed out the safety of NOAC as a reasonable alternative to warfarin inpatient with intracardiac clots emphasizing the ESC recommendation in this regards. We recommend a randomized studies to prove the superiority of NOAC as anticoagulation of choice in intracardiac thrombi.
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: Analysis of safety and outcome of use of NOAC in intracardiac thrombi over warfarin
Description:
Abstract
Introduction
Intracardiac clots occur in 15- 25% of patients post myocardial infarction and in patient with atrial fibrillation.
It holds poor outcome if not treated with anticoagulation.
Warfarin remains the drug of choice in such patients, however recently according to the newly published data, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) has recommended non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulant (NOAC) for intracardiac clots as a class 2A recommendation.
There is no documented data in the region of the gulf regarding the use of NOAC in intracardiac clots.
Aim
We aim in this study to evaluate the use of NOAC in the treatment of intracardiac clots over warfarin, by studying the effectiveness, safety and associated complications.
Methodology
A retrospective cohort study from April 2017 to December 2023 was conducted of patient’s above 18 years old who have a documented intracardiac clot on echocardiography.
The patient were grouped into patients discharged on NOAC and those discharged on warfarin.
The participants were studied for resolution of clot and development of complication; death, bleeding and thrombosis.
Results
A total of 253 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria.
Out of which 45 ( 18%) patients were discharged on NOAC and 208 (82%) on warfarin.
The two groups had similar demographics with equally mean age of 71 years old , 89% being males, 38% hypertensive and most common clot in the left ventricle in both groups.
From those patients with documented follow up ( NOAC 45% average of 8 months, Warfarin 62% average of 7 months); 48% in the NOAC group had a documented resolution of the clot while 44% in the warfarin group had a documented resolution of the intracardiac clot.
(p value of 0.
7) The median resolution time in the NOAC group was 4 months while in the warfarin group 3.
5 months.
Bleeding occurred in 19% and mortality rate was 5% in NOAC group, while in the warfarin group 10% developed bleeding and mortality rate was 6%.
Conclusion
Our data pointed out the safety of NOAC as a reasonable alternative to warfarin inpatient with intracardiac clots emphasizing the ESC recommendation in this regards.
We recommend a randomized studies to prove the superiority of NOAC as anticoagulation of choice in intracardiac thrombi.
Related Results
Drug interactions in incident NOACs users and risk of bleeding
Drug interactions in incident NOACs users and risk of bleeding
Abstract
Introduction
Oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are known to have a better safety profile than Vitamin K antagonists, but thei...
Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant discontinuation in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients (ASPECT-NOAC)
Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant discontinuation in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients (ASPECT-NOAC)
Abstract
Background and aim
Data on NOAC discontinuation patterns in Turkey are lacking. We conducted a subgroup analysis in ASP...
Establishment of pharmacogenomic algorithm for predicting stable warfarin dose in Chinese patients
Establishment of pharmacogenomic algorithm for predicting stable warfarin dose in Chinese patients
Background
Genetic variants of cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) and vitamin K epoxide reductase (VKORC1) are known to influence warfarin dose, but the effect of other...
Abstract 448: Assessment of Drug Interaction Potential Between LCZ696 and Warfarin
Abstract 448: Assessment of Drug Interaction Potential Between LCZ696 and Warfarin
Objective:
LCZ696 is a first-in-class angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) being developed for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases including hypertensi...
Rethinking Anticoagulation in Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplantation
Rethinking Anticoagulation in Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplantation
BackgroundA clinical dilemma exists in patients with CKD, ESKD, and after kidney transplantation, as they face concurrent risks of both thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications...
Efficacy and Safety of Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Patients Treated with Rivaroxaban or Apixaban Compared to Warfarin Presenting with Major Bleeding
Efficacy and Safety of Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Patients Treated with Rivaroxaban or Apixaban Compared to Warfarin Presenting with Major Bleeding
Abstract
Introduction
Bleeding is the major complication of anticoagulant therapy. Reversal of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with major ble...
A Digital Health System to Assist Family Physicians to Safely Prescribe NOAC Medications
A Digital Health System to Assist Family Physicians to Safely Prescribe NOAC Medications
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. Generally, the therapeutic options for managing AF include the use of anticoagulant drugs that prevent the coagulati...
The Burden of Road Traffic Injuries: A Global Perspective
The Burden of Road Traffic Injuries: A Global Perspective
Introduction Road Traffic Injury (RTI) pose a significant health challenge. It represents the eighth leading cause of death globally, prompting the UN to designate 2011-2020 as...

