Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Four-Year Outcomes of Duodeno-Ileal Bipartition Using Self-Forming Magnets: The Sutureless Neodymium Anastomosis Procedure (SNAP) for Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass and duodeno-ileal bipartition are effective metabolic surgeries but remain technically demanding due to the complexity and risk of duodeno-ileal anastomotic leaks.. Magnetic compression anastomosis using Self-Forming Magnets (SFM) offers a simplified, sutureless alternative that may reduce procedural risk. This study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and four-year outcomes of the SFM Sutureless Neodymium Anastomosis Procedure (SNAP) in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods This prospective, single-center study included patients with obesity and T2DM. The SNAP technique involved endoscopic and laparoscopic deployment of SFMs to create a duodeno-ileal anastomosis without sutures or staples. Primary endpoint was change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) through 48 months. Secondary endpoints included percent total weight loss (%TWL) and safety outcomes. Results Fourteen patients (age 48 ± 9 years; 50% female; baseline BMI 40.4 ± 3.7 kg/m²) underwent successful SNAP creation (technical success 100%). Mean procedural time was 68 ± 20 minutes. No adverse events occurred. HbA1c significantly decreased from 8.3 ± 1.3% to 6.4 ± 0.6%, 6.6 ± 1.2%, 6.4 ± 1.5%, and 6.9 ± 1.8% at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months, respectively (all p < 0.05). Corresponding %TWL was 13.4 ± 8.6%, 14.2 ± 11.5%, 15.6 ± 13.6%, and 13.5 ± 12.9%. Conclusions SFM-assisted duodeno-ileal bipartition using the SNAP technique is feasible, safe, and durable, producing clinically meaningful and sustained weight loss and glycemic improvement over four years. This magnet-based, sutureless approach may represent a less invasive alternative to conventional duodeno-ileal anastomosis in metabolic surgery.
Title: Four-Year Outcomes of Duodeno-Ileal Bipartition Using Self-Forming Magnets: The Sutureless Neodymium Anastomosis Procedure (SNAP) for Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes
Description:
Abstract Background Single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass and duodeno-ileal bipartition are effective metabolic surgeries but remain technically demanding due to the complexity and risk of duodeno-ileal anastomotic leaks.
Magnetic compression anastomosis using Self-Forming Magnets (SFM) offers a simplified, sutureless alternative that may reduce procedural risk.
This study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and four-year outcomes of the SFM Sutureless Neodymium Anastomosis Procedure (SNAP) in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
Methods This prospective, single-center study included patients with obesity and T2DM.
The SNAP technique involved endoscopic and laparoscopic deployment of SFMs to create a duodeno-ileal anastomosis without sutures or staples.
Primary endpoint was change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) through 48 months.
Secondary endpoints included percent total weight loss (%TWL) and safety outcomes.
Results Fourteen patients (age 48 ± 9 years; 50% female; baseline BMI 40.
4 ± 3.
7 kg/m²) underwent successful SNAP creation (technical success 100%).
Mean procedural time was 68 ± 20 minutes.
No adverse events occurred.
HbA1c significantly decreased from 8.
3 ± 1.
3% to 6.
4 ± 0.
6%, 6.
6 ± 1.
2%, 6.
4 ± 1.
5%, and 6.
9 ± 1.
8% at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months, respectively (all p < 0.
05).
Corresponding %TWL was 13.
4 ± 8.
6%, 14.
2 ± 11.
5%, 15.
6 ± 13.
6%, and 13.
5 ± 12.
9%.
Conclusions SFM-assisted duodeno-ileal bipartition using the SNAP technique is feasible, safe, and durable, producing clinically meaningful and sustained weight loss and glycemic improvement over four years.
This magnet-based, sutureless approach may represent a less invasive alternative to conventional duodeno-ileal anastomosis in metabolic surgery.

Related Results

A Comparative Study Between Stapler Versus Handsewn Anastomosis in Gastrointestinal Surgery
A Comparative Study Between Stapler Versus Handsewn Anastomosis in Gastrointestinal Surgery
Objective: To contrast outcome of hand-sewn and stapler anastomosis in gastro intestinal surgeries in terms of ‘time required for anastomoses, postoperative complications and Hospi...
Single layer vs double layer intestinal anastomosis- a prospective comparative study.
Single layer vs double layer intestinal anastomosis- a prospective comparative study.
Abstract Gastrointestinal anastomosis is one of the commonest surgical procedure performed worldwide. The aim of the anastomosis is to make a sound alignment of the bowel t...
Obstacles and Impediments of Overweight and Obesity
Obstacles and Impediments of Overweight and Obesity
Obesity is now pandemic, affecting millions of people in worldwide [1]. Obesity is defined as the excessive fat accumulation which may damage the health. Two groups of beneficial b...
Sleeve gastrectomy plus single anastomosis sleeve ileal bipartition versus sleeve gastrectomy alone: The role of bipartition
Sleeve gastrectomy plus single anastomosis sleeve ileal bipartition versus sleeve gastrectomy alone: The role of bipartition
AbstractBackgroundSleeve gastrectomy (SG) with single anastomosis sleeve ileal bipartition (SASI) is a novel procedure for increasing the anti‐metabolic efficacy of SG in severely ...
Diabetes Mellitus: Life Style, Obesity and Insulin Resistance
Diabetes Mellitus: Life Style, Obesity and Insulin Resistance
In millennia, 40 million people were died with non-communicable diseases and diabetes is one of them. In diabetes, insulin secretions are not produced properly or resist to body an...

Back to Top