Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Trade, Investment and Politics between China and Central and Eastern Europe Economic Necessity or a Trojan Horse?
View through CrossRef
Ever since the inception of the cooperation, the 16+1 has been a target of tremendous criticism. The EU and certain Western member states have been concerned of the increased level of Chinese activity in the Eastern part of the integration and afraid that Beijing might try to divide and rule the EU through the 16+1. Furthermore, EU-China relations have been deteriorating in general recently, as Europe is more and more frustrated by the rise of China, and Beijing is getting more and more disappointed by the slow progress of the EU while its own self confidence is on the rise. Certain major European countries like France or Germany are concerned of the Chinese activities in the CEE region, as they see China as a competitor on a market they have always considered as their home turf. In 2012, I was attending an interesting closed-door roundtable on EU-China relations in Brussels, where a diplomat from one of the Western European countries set forth his remarkable assessment of the 16+1 initiative as he said: “China and Central Europe were building a new Berlin Wall across the EU.” In the following, I would like to challenge this oversimplified discourse and to point out that Chinese influence in the region is very limited if not marginal, and its source is not the economy, as despite all previous expectations Chinese economic presence is still insignificant in CEE countries, and what China has been offering is not an attractive economic alternative to the EU members of the region. I believe it is of utmost importance to understand the real causes of the pro-China movement of certain CEE countries, since a misguided and oversimplified discourse, focusing on Chinese economic offers does not catch the reality, and measured responses cannot be placed on misbeliefs. Based on the arguments offered by the dissertation, the dilemma presented in the subtitle of the present thesis is invalid. The cooperation between China and the CEE-11 countries was driven by economic necessities following the double crises of the early 2010’s, but it has never fulfilled its promises, and thus it has been losing its significance lately. Alleged Chinese attempts to divide the EU through its cooperation with CEE-11 countries cannot be proven, as Beijing does not have the economic leverage in the region to exercise real political influence over the EU level policies of CEE-11 nations. Some CEE-11 government, however, have tried to gain political and economic benefits through serving Chinese interests in certain cases, but these attempts have rather served the personal political interest of CEE-11 politicians than of the nation they are supposed to work for. Therefore, the source of Chinese influence in CEE-11 countries does not originate directly from Beijing but from the political elite of some Central and Eastern European Countries.
Title: Trade, Investment and Politics between China and Central and Eastern Europe Economic Necessity or a Trojan Horse?
Description:
Ever since the inception of the cooperation, the 16+1 has been a target of tremendous criticism.
The EU and certain Western member states have been concerned of the increased level of Chinese activity in the Eastern part of the integration and afraid that Beijing might try to divide and rule the EU through the 16+1.
Furthermore, EU-China relations have been deteriorating in general recently, as Europe is more and more frustrated by the rise of China, and Beijing is getting more and more disappointed by the slow progress of the EU while its own self confidence is on the rise.
Certain major European countries like France or Germany are concerned of the Chinese activities in the CEE region, as they see China as a competitor on a market they have always considered as their home turf.
In 2012, I was attending an interesting closed-door roundtable on EU-China relations in Brussels, where a diplomat from one of the Western European countries set forth his remarkable assessment of the 16+1 initiative as he said: “China and Central Europe were building a new Berlin Wall across the EU.
” In the following, I would like to challenge this oversimplified discourse and to point out that Chinese influence in the region is very limited if not marginal, and its source is not the economy, as despite all previous expectations Chinese economic presence is still insignificant in CEE countries, and what China has been offering is not an attractive economic alternative to the EU members of the region.
I believe it is of utmost importance to understand the real causes of the pro-China movement of certain CEE countries, since a misguided and oversimplified discourse, focusing on Chinese economic offers does not catch the reality, and measured responses cannot be placed on misbeliefs.
Based on the arguments offered by the dissertation, the dilemma presented in the subtitle of the present thesis is invalid.
The cooperation between China and the CEE-11 countries was driven by economic necessities following the double crises of the early 2010’s, but it has never fulfilled its promises, and thus it has been losing its significance lately.
Alleged Chinese attempts to divide the EU through its cooperation with CEE-11 countries cannot be proven, as Beijing does not have the economic leverage in the region to exercise real political influence over the EU level policies of CEE-11 nations.
Some CEE-11 government, however, have tried to gain political and economic benefits through serving Chinese interests in certain cases, but these attempts have rather served the personal political interest of CEE-11 politicians than of the nation they are supposed to work for.
Therefore, the source of Chinese influence in CEE-11 countries does not originate directly from Beijing but from the political elite of some Central and Eastern European Countries.
Related Results
Ekonomika bosanskih velikaša u 14. i 15. stoljeću
Ekonomika bosanskih velikaša u 14. i 15. stoljeću
The role and significance of the Bosnian nobility in the historical currents of medieval Bosnia can be reliably traced in the 14th and 15th centuries when various socio-political f...
Equestrian: Horse sport development and cooperation between horses and humans
Equestrian: Horse sport development and cooperation between horses and humans
One of the most important industries in China’s history has been the horse industry, and the modern horse industry is still in the process of being transformed. When the horse busi...
Analysis of the current situation of agricultural trade development between China and Ukraine
Analysis of the current situation of agricultural trade development between China and Ukraine
Purpose. As a European granary, Ukraine has rich agricultural resources. China is a country with a large population and has a large demand for food. However, the agricultural trade...
ACTUAL ISSUES OF ASSESSMENT OF THE INVESTMENT ENVIRONMENT
ACTUAL ISSUES OF ASSESSMENT OF THE INVESTMENT ENVIRONMENT
One of the most important factors of the sustainable and safe development of the national economy is the availability of investment resources in the economy, the establishment of a...
European Economic Integration
European Economic Integration
This book investigates the evolution of the integration process of the European Union (EU) under the lenses of economic development. The process of the European Economic Integratio...
Balancing Trade and Competition in Pakistan
Balancing Trade and Competition in Pakistan
High tariff rates have increased the overall cost of production in Pakistan, and the domestic prices of many products have become much higher than the international market prices. ...
International trade between Turkey and China
International trade between Turkey and China
Purpose- This study examines the development of China – Turkey international trade with the comparison of macroeconomic trends, global trade developments, bilateral agreements. Als...
Giovanni Paolo II e l’Europa
Giovanni Paolo II e l’Europa
John Paul II and Europe
In his article entitled ‘Una frontiera per l’Europa: dove?’ (The boundary of Europe: where is it located?), published in Vita e Pensiero (October 197...

