Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The New Athenian Statue Bases

View through CrossRef
The three marble statue bases found in February 1922, incorporated as integral parts of the wall of Athens, are unique records of Attic art. While their supreme importance was recognised from the moment of their discovery, their exact contribution to our knowledge of Attic art is a matter upon which a variety of opinions has been expressed.M. Philadelpheus, who as Ephor of antiquities of Attica was responsible for their custody at the time of discovery, was the first to publish them. He describes each briefly. No. I. he dates to the end of the sixth century B.C. No. II. he leaves undated, and No. III. he assigns either to the Peisistratid period or to the period of the Republic before 480. He makes no attempt to deal with the works in detail or to analyse their artistic significance.M. Oikonomos has published a brief account of II. b, in which he suggests an interpretation of the so-called ‘hockey’ game. He disregards the problems of style and date.Dr. della Seta of the Italian School at Athens is the only authority at present to discuss the artistic value and significance of Bases I. and II. and to attempt to place them chronologically in the Attic series. His exhaustive and attractive articles deserve the closest attention.
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Title: The New Athenian Statue Bases
Description:
The three marble statue bases found in February 1922, incorporated as integral parts of the wall of Athens, are unique records of Attic art.
While their supreme importance was recognised from the moment of their discovery, their exact contribution to our knowledge of Attic art is a matter upon which a variety of opinions has been expressed.
M.
Philadelpheus, who as Ephor of antiquities of Attica was responsible for their custody at the time of discovery, was the first to publish them.
He describes each briefly.
No.
I.
he dates to the end of the sixth century B.
C.
No.
II.
he leaves undated, and No.
III.
he assigns either to the Peisistratid period or to the period of the Republic before 480.
He makes no attempt to deal with the works in detail or to analyse their artistic significance.
M.
Oikonomos has published a brief account of II.
b, in which he suggests an interpretation of the so-called ‘hockey’ game.
He disregards the problems of style and date.
Dr.
della Seta of the Italian School at Athens is the only authority at present to discuss the artistic value and significance of Bases I.
and II.
and to attempt to place them chronologically in the Attic series.
His exhaustive and attractive articles deserve the closest attention.

Related Results

Elements of spatial data quality as information technology support for sustainable development planning
Elements of spatial data quality as information technology support for sustainable development planning
We are witnessing nowadays that the last decade of the past century, as well as the first years of the present one, have brought technology expansion with respect to spatial data g...
Protesting the Expansion of US Military Bases in Pyeongtaek: A Local Movement in South Korea
Protesting the Expansion of US Military Bases in Pyeongtaek: A Local Movement in South Korea
Since World War II, US military bases have become a global phenomenon and generated complex responses from their “host” societies. For these past six decades, South Korea has funct...
Athenian Imperialism
Athenian Imperialism
L'impérialisme athénien, by Jacqueline de Romilly, recently published, is an important contribution to Thucydidean studies; and as foreign books usually not only cost more but take...
Transpacific Camptowns: Korean Women, US Army Bases, and Military Prostitution in America
Transpacific Camptowns: Korean Women, US Army Bases, and Military Prostitution in America
Abstract Military prostitution has been a staple of US–Korea relations since the 1940s, contained in the so-called camptown communities surrounding US military bases...
Statue habit and statue culture in Late Antique Rome
Statue habit and statue culture in Late Antique Rome
AbstractThe statue habit was a defining characteristic of Classical cities, and its demise in Late Antiquity has recently attracted scholarly attention. This article analyzes this ...
Authenticity in the replica Athenian trieres
Authenticity in the replica Athenian trieres
The building of a replica classical warship, the Athenian trieres, is the most ambitious project of experimental archaeology so far. The ship is building in a Piraeus yard to a des...
Religious Authority in Archaic and Classical Athens
Religious Authority in Archaic and Classical Athens
The paper considers who has the right in the Athenian state to act authoritatively both in the name of, and in matters of, religion. It discusses the role of priests, the demos, ma...
Misunderstood Gestures: Iconatrophy and the Reception of Greek Sculpture in the Roman Imperial Period
Misunderstood Gestures: Iconatrophy and the Reception of Greek Sculpture in the Roman Imperial Period
Abstract Anthropologists have defined iconatrophy as a process by which oral traditions originate as explanations for objects that, through the passage of time, have ceased to make...

Back to Top