Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Relationships between otolith microstructure, otolith growth, somatic growth and ontogenetic transitions in two cohorts of windowpane

View through CrossRef
Otolith increments in larval and juvenile windowpane Scophthalmus aquosus can provide an estimate of daily age for spring‐spawned individuals held under summer conditions. Otolith increments for spring‐ and autumn‐spawned individuals occurred at intervals >1 day under winter conditions. A significant decrease in the slope of the linear relationship between otolith size and somatic size at 40 mm LS coincided with significant habitat, morphological and behavioural transitions. In smaller, field‐captured windowpane belonging to spring‐ and autumn‐spawned cohorts, the formation of accessory growth centres coincided with a transitional settlement period and the completion of eye migration (c. 8–20 mm LS). Back‐calculated growth rate estimates for spring‐spawned windowpane were significantly faster than those for autumn‐spawned windowpane and these differences could produce differential rates of survival for the two cohorts during the first year of life.
Title: Relationships between otolith microstructure, otolith growth, somatic growth and ontogenetic transitions in two cohorts of windowpane
Description:
Otolith increments in larval and juvenile windowpane Scophthalmus aquosus can provide an estimate of daily age for spring‐spawned individuals held under summer conditions.
Otolith increments for spring‐ and autumn‐spawned individuals occurred at intervals >1 day under winter conditions.
A significant decrease in the slope of the linear relationship between otolith size and somatic size at 40 mm LS coincided with significant habitat, morphological and behavioural transitions.
In smaller, field‐captured windowpane belonging to spring‐ and autumn‐spawned cohorts, the formation of accessory growth centres coincided with a transitional settlement period and the completion of eye migration (c.
8–20 mm LS).
Back‐calculated growth rate estimates for spring‐spawned windowpane were significantly faster than those for autumn‐spawned windowpane and these differences could produce differential rates of survival for the two cohorts during the first year of life.

Related Results

Determining salmon provenance with automated otolith reading
Determining salmon provenance with automated otolith reading
AbstractSynthetic otolith marks are used at hundreds of hatcheries throughout the Pacific Rim to record the release location of salmon. Each year, human readers examine tens of tho...
Introducing ‘Intimate Civility’: Towards a New Concept for 21st-Century Relationships
Introducing ‘Intimate Civility’: Towards a New Concept for 21st-Century Relationships
Fig. 1: Photo by Miguel Orós, from unsplash.comFeminism has stalled at the bedroom door. In the post-#metoo era, more than ever, we need intimate civil rights in our relationships ...
Stochastic Models for Ontogenetic Growth
Stochastic Models for Ontogenetic Growth
Based on allometric theory and scaling laws, numerous mathematical models have been proposed to study ontogenetic growth patterns of animals. Although deterministic models have pro...
Fatter or Stronger: Resource Allocation Strategy and the Underlying Metabolic Mechanisms in Amphibian Tadpole
Fatter or Stronger: Resource Allocation Strategy and the Underlying Metabolic Mechanisms in Amphibian Tadpole
Abstract BackgroundResource allocation trade-off between storage and somatic growth is an essential physiological phenomenon in animals. Revealing its patterns and underlyi...

Back to Top