Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Which Firms Use Universities as Cooperation Partners? – The Comparative View in Europe

View through CrossRef
This paper presents an econometric analysis of the characteristics of firm’s cooperating with universities using Community Innovation Survey (CIS) data for 14 European countries. Our model incorporates three groups of variables which could be related to the probability to cooperate with universities. The first group of variables is related to the size of a firm, the second group measures different innovation activities and the third group describes the internationalisation of firms. In addition, we test for the number of linkages, public financing and the sector of the firm. In order to provide a comparative view across the European countries we use the CIS for the period 2006-2008, where we have data for 14 countries. We use a standard logit model for firm level data, with a dependent variable indicating whether a firm used a university as a cooperation partner or not. We estimate two separate models for cooperating with home and with foreign universities. Our main findings reveal that despite the origin of the university, firms must have a certain level of capabilities to have universities as cooperation partners – conducting internal or external R&D is a significant factor characterising the cooperation with universities. Investments into machinery and equipment as one of the innovative activities are hindering the cooperation with universities. Significant differences between firms that cooperate with home universities, compared to those cooperating with foreign universities exist. Firms cooperating with foreign universities are characterised by a higher level of internationalisation, measured by an export and foreign ownership dummy.
Title: Which Firms Use Universities as Cooperation Partners? – The Comparative View in Europe
Description:
This paper presents an econometric analysis of the characteristics of firm’s cooperating with universities using Community Innovation Survey (CIS) data for 14 European countries.
Our model incorporates three groups of variables which could be related to the probability to cooperate with universities.
The first group of variables is related to the size of a firm, the second group measures different innovation activities and the third group describes the internationalisation of firms.
In addition, we test for the number of linkages, public financing and the sector of the firm.
In order to provide a comparative view across the European countries we use the CIS for the period 2006-2008, where we have data for 14 countries.
We use a standard logit model for firm level data, with a dependent variable indicating whether a firm used a university as a cooperation partner or not.
We estimate two separate models for cooperating with home and with foreign universities.
Our main findings reveal that despite the origin of the university, firms must have a certain level of capabilities to have universities as cooperation partners – conducting internal or external R&D is a significant factor characterising the cooperation with universities.
Investments into machinery and equipment as one of the innovative activities are hindering the cooperation with universities.
Significant differences between firms that cooperate with home universities, compared to those cooperating with foreign universities exist.
Firms cooperating with foreign universities are characterised by a higher level of internationalisation, measured by an export and foreign ownership dummy.

Related Results

Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Innovation in family firms: The Brittelstand
Innovation in family firms: The Brittelstand
PurposeThe Brittelstand are innovative, family-owned firms that offer national and international opportunities in the United Kingdom (UK). These fast-growing businesses are custome...
Communication policy of Kharkiv universities in social networks
Communication policy of Kharkiv universities in social networks
The purpose of this paper is to examine the universities’ presence on the social media as a part of universities’ communication policy and to define the most popular social media w...
The Burden of Road Traffic Injuries: A Global Perspective
The Burden of Road Traffic Injuries: A Global Perspective
Introduction     Road Traffic Injury (RTI) pose a significant health challenge. It represents the eighth leading cause of death globally, prompting the UN to designate 2011-2020 as...
Volume 10, Index
Volume 10, Index
<p><strong>Vol 10, No 1 (2015)</strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><a href="http://www.world-education-center.org/index...
CONCEPTUAL ASPECTS OF UNIVERSITIES AND BUSINESS COOPERATION
CONCEPTUAL ASPECTS OF UNIVERSITIES AND BUSINESS COOPERATION
An article devoted to the main aspects of the cooperation between universities and business. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the tools of cooperation of domestic univ...
First Impressions Count: Foreign Firms' Entry and Exit from the U.S.
First Impressions Count: Foreign Firms' Entry and Exit from the U.S.
We examine the listings and delistings of foreign firms from major U.S. exchanges over the period 1962 - 2006. Over this period a total of 1,344 firms listed and 724 firms deliste...
Assessing university performance and strategic paths in the presence of multiple objectives
Assessing university performance and strategic paths in the presence of multiple objectives
Competitiveness and excellence heavily rely on the capacity of regions to innovate and transfer knowledge from academic institutions to society. In a scenario where these values ac...

Back to Top