Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Bases of criminal legal counteraction to separatism.
View through CrossRef
The criminal-law component is the most important element of the state-legal mechanism for combating separatism. The existing system of criminal-law protection of state sovereignty and territorial integrity and inviolability should be aimed at protecting against all existing and possible manifestations of separatism, taking into account current trends of its development.
The methodological basis of the proposed article is traditional. In particular, used system-structural and formal-logical methods, which are covered by the general method of dialectical cognition.
Criminal responsibility for separatism can only occur for specific crimes in which separatism is manifested as a phenomenon. In this regard, it is inappropriate to accept proposals for the legislative definition of the composition of the crime of “separatism” because of the particular complexity of this concept, because separatism is a complex of actions, and the article usually assumes responsibility for a specific action. At the present stage, it is advisable to adopt a special law to counteract separatism in order to systematically counteract this negative phenomenon.
Criminal responsibility for separatist activity comes mainly under Art. 110 “Attack on the territorial integrity and inviolability of Ukraine” of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. The so-called “separatist” acts may also be crimes under Article 109 “Actions aimed at violent alteration or overthrow of the constitutional order or seizure of state power”, 1102 “Financing actions taken for the purpose of violent alteration or overthrow of the constitutional order or seizure of state power, changes of borders of the territory or state border of Ukraine”, 111 “State treason”. The so-called “separatist” can be attributed to other crimes in certain cases. The so-called “separatist” can be attributed to other crimes in certain cases. It should be borne in mind that separatist activities may be accompanied by the commission of crimes under Articles 258 “Terrorist Act”, 2583 “Creation of terrorist group or terrorist organization”, 260 “Creation of non-statutory paramilitary or armed formations”, 341 “Capture of state or civil structures” etc.
Koretsky Institute of State and Law of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Title: Bases of criminal legal counteraction to separatism.
Description:
The criminal-law component is the most important element of the state-legal mechanism for combating separatism.
The existing system of criminal-law protection of state sovereignty and territorial integrity and inviolability should be aimed at protecting against all existing and possible manifestations of separatism, taking into account current trends of its development.
The methodological basis of the proposed article is traditional.
In particular, used system-structural and formal-logical methods, which are covered by the general method of dialectical cognition.
Criminal responsibility for separatism can only occur for specific crimes in which separatism is manifested as a phenomenon.
In this regard, it is inappropriate to accept proposals for the legislative definition of the composition of the crime of “separatism” because of the particular complexity of this concept, because separatism is a complex of actions, and the article usually assumes responsibility for a specific action.
At the present stage, it is advisable to adopt a special law to counteract separatism in order to systematically counteract this negative phenomenon.
Criminal responsibility for separatist activity comes mainly under Art.
110 “Attack on the territorial integrity and inviolability of Ukraine” of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.
The so-called “separatist” acts may also be crimes under Article 109 “Actions aimed at violent alteration or overthrow of the constitutional order or seizure of state power”, 1102 “Financing actions taken for the purpose of violent alteration or overthrow of the constitutional order or seizure of state power, changes of borders of the territory or state border of Ukraine”, 111 “State treason”.
The so-called “separatist” can be attributed to other crimes in certain cases.
The so-called “separatist” can be attributed to other crimes in certain cases.
It should be borne in mind that separatist activities may be accompanied by the commission of crimes under Articles 258 “Terrorist Act”, 2583 “Creation of terrorist group or terrorist organization”, 260 “Creation of non-statutory paramilitary or armed formations”, 341 “Capture of state or civil structures” etc.
Related Results
Fraud Using Bank Payment Cards: A Way for Financing of Terrorism and Separatism
Fraud Using Bank Payment Cards: A Way for Financing of Terrorism and Separatism
It is substantiated that intensification of terrorism and separatism in Ukraine in time of war rises the priority of problems related with fight against their financing. The bankin...
ANKSI KEBIRI KIMIA BSAGI PELAKU KEJAHATAN SEKSUAL TERHADAP ANAK
ANKSI KEBIRI KIMIA BSAGI PELAKU KEJAHATAN SEKSUAL TERHADAP ANAK
Sexual crime case against children’s in Indonesia are increasing rapidly from time to time. The more tragic fact is that most of the suspect origins from their own kin or around ...
THE ANALOGY OF STATUTE AND THE ANALOGY OF LAW AS DOCTRINAL INSTRUMENTS FOR LEGAL RESPONSE TO ECONOMIC CHALLENGES
THE ANALOGY OF STATUTE AND THE ANALOGY OF LAW AS DOCTRINAL INSTRUMENTS FOR LEGAL RESPONSE TO ECONOMIC CHALLENGES
Ukraine's contemporary legal system is undergoing a period of significant transformation, which necessitates not only a robust and stable legal framework, but also a flexible doctr...
THE EXISTENCE OF CRIMINAL LAW IN NATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW REFORM
THE EXISTENCE OF CRIMINAL LAW IN NATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW REFORM
The problem of reforming criminal law is one of the impo important issues that need in all its aspects in connection with efforts to reform criminal law in our country. It is said ...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Confronting with the Prosecution
Confronting with the Prosecution
Confronting criminal investigation activity cannot always be qualified as illegal activity of some participants in the criminal process. The right to defense in the criminal proces...
Analisis Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Pidana di Indonesia : Pidana Barat (KUHP) dan Pidana Adat
Analisis Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Pidana di Indonesia : Pidana Barat (KUHP) dan Pidana Adat
Indonesia has two frameworks of a criminal law system that runs in parallel, namely Western criminal law which comes from the Dutch colonial heritage through the Criminal Code (KUH...
TRENDS AND CONTRADICTIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEGAL TECH
TRENDS AND CONTRADICTIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEGAL TECH
Problem setting. Digitalization has recently become increasingly important in the professional everyday life of a lawyer. Since 2020, trends in the automation of legal processes ha...

