Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Does Suture Anchor Number Influence Outcomes after Arthroscopic Bankart Repair? A 2-year Prospective Study
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Introduction:
Anterior shoulder instability is common among young, active individuals, with Bankart lesions present in the majority of cases. While arthroscopic Bankart repair is the current standard of care, the optimal number of suture anchors remains debated. This prospective study evaluated whether anchor number influences functional outcomes and recurrence rates over 2 years.
Methods:
A total of 100 consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair for magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed Bankart lesions between December 2019 and December 2022 were included. Exclusion criteria were significant bone loss, multidirectional instability, rotator cuff tears, and connective tissue disorders. Repairs were performed by a single surgeon using two or more anchors, with remplissage added for engaging Hill–Sachs lesions. Functional scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES], Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [DASH], and ROWE), range of motion, and pain (visual analog scale [VAS]) were recorded preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Outcomes were compared between patients receiving two anchors versus ≥3 anchors.
Results:
Mean age was 25.2 ± 7.1 years; 91% were male. Two anchors were used in 77% of cases. Remplissage was performed in 26%. At 2 years, mean VAS decreased from 5.0 to 0.8, ASES improved from 48.2 to 88.1, Quick DASH from 42.0 to 9.6, and ROWE from 50.9 to 92.4 (
P
< 0.001). Range of motion improved significantly without clinically relevant external rotation loss. No recurrences or anchor-related complications occurred. Functional outcomes were equivalent between anchor groups and remplissage status.
Conclusion:
Our findings suggest that, in carefully selected patients without major bone loss, arthroscopic Bankart repair provides excellent early to midterm functional outcomes and stability, and that outcomes are not significantly influenced by the absolute number of suture anchors used.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Does Suture Anchor Number Influence Outcomes after Arthroscopic Bankart Repair? A 2-year Prospective Study
Description:
Abstract
Introduction:
Anterior shoulder instability is common among young, active individuals, with Bankart lesions present in the majority of cases.
While arthroscopic Bankart repair is the current standard of care, the optimal number of suture anchors remains debated.
This prospective study evaluated whether anchor number influences functional outcomes and recurrence rates over 2 years.
Methods:
A total of 100 consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair for magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed Bankart lesions between December 2019 and December 2022 were included.
Exclusion criteria were significant bone loss, multidirectional instability, rotator cuff tears, and connective tissue disorders.
Repairs were performed by a single surgeon using two or more anchors, with remplissage added for engaging Hill–Sachs lesions.
Functional scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES], Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [DASH], and ROWE), range of motion, and pain (visual analog scale [VAS]) were recorded preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.
Outcomes were compared between patients receiving two anchors versus ≥3 anchors.
Results:
Mean age was 25.
2 ± 7.
1 years; 91% were male.
Two anchors were used in 77% of cases.
Remplissage was performed in 26%.
At 2 years, mean VAS decreased from 5.
0 to 0.
8, ASES improved from 48.
2 to 88.
1, Quick DASH from 42.
0 to 9.
6, and ROWE from 50.
9 to 92.
4 (
P
< 0.
001).
Range of motion improved significantly without clinically relevant external rotation loss.
No recurrences or anchor-related complications occurred.
Functional outcomes were equivalent between anchor groups and remplissage status.
Conclusion:
Our findings suggest that, in carefully selected patients without major bone loss, arthroscopic Bankart repair provides excellent early to midterm functional outcomes and stability, and that outcomes are not significantly influenced by the absolute number of suture anchors used.
Related Results
Concomitant Medial Meniscal Root Repair with Extrusion Repair (Centralization Technique)
Concomitant Medial Meniscal Root Repair with Extrusion Repair (Centralization Technique)
Background:
Meniscal extrusion is a phenomenon in which a degenerative posterior horn tear, radial tear, or root tear results in displacement of the body of the meniscu...
Arthroscopic Suture Anchor Capsulorrhaphy Versus Suture Capsulorrhaphy in a Cadaveric Model (SS‐01)
Arthroscopic Suture Anchor Capsulorrhaphy Versus Suture Capsulorrhaphy in a Cadaveric Model (SS‐01)
Introduction
Recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability is challenging to treat. Arthroscopic capsulorrhaphy utilizing either a solitary suture or suture ancho...
Outcomes of Shoulder Instability Repair - Latarjet vs Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Retrospective Study
Outcomes of Shoulder Instability Repair - Latarjet vs Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Retrospective Study
This retrospective study aimed to compare the outcomes of two surgical procedures, Latarjet repair and arthroscopic Bankart repair, for the treatment of anterior shoulder instabili...
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair (ABR) with Arthroscopic Subscapularis Augmentation (ASA) in the Treatment of Chronic Anterior Shoulder Instability in Bangladesh
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair (ABR) with Arthroscopic Subscapularis Augmentation (ASA) in the Treatment of Chronic Anterior Shoulder Instability in Bangladesh
Background: Anterior shoulder instability is very common in Bangladesh. Arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) is used to treat this condition, but its recurrence rate is very high. To ...
Suction Anchors
Suction Anchors
Abstract
The development of self-burying suction anchors is described and data on pull-out forces presented for both inverted-cup and solid hemispherical types em...
The “Cruciate Suture” for Arthroscopic Meniscal Repair: A New Technique
The “Cruciate Suture” for Arthroscopic Meniscal Repair: A New Technique
Abstract
Meniscal repair has become the treatment of choice whenever a reparable tear is diagnosed. Fixation strength of the repair technique is always of paramou...
Is Revision Arthroscopic Bankart Repair a Viable Option? A Systematic Review of Recurrent Instability Following Bankart Repair
Is Revision Arthroscopic Bankart Repair a Viable Option? A Systematic Review of Recurrent Instability Following Bankart Repair
Background/Objectives
Recurrent shoulder instability following Bankart lesion repair often necessitates surgical revision. Identified risk factors include young age, glenoid bone l...
Suture-Induced Tubo-Ovarian Abscess: A Case Report with Literature Review
Suture-Induced Tubo-Ovarian Abscess: A Case Report with Literature Review
Abstract
Introduction
Suture is an underreported cause for tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA) that can cause significant morbidity. This report describes a case of TOA arising from a silk ...

