Javascript must be enabled to continue!
“My work... was not in vain”
View through CrossRef
The publication is a commentary and texts of three previously unknown letters written to each other by N.I. Vorobyev and R.K. Gareeva (Urazmanova), who would later become the leading specialist in Tatar rites and holidays. The conducted analysis of the document revealed the peculiarities of scholarly communication between these individuals, the emotions of an inexperienced but science-minded young school teacher who was involved in the research work, and the influence of Marxist-Leninist ideology on the understanding of the importance of the ethnography science in the Soviet times. Gareeva’s first letter was written on January 23, 1961. In the letter, she shared her concerns about not understanding the need for ethnography. Vorobyev wrote her a detailed response in February of the same year. Nikolai Iosifovich divided the letter into sections. In the first part, when discussing the age of science and technology, he points out the spiritual needs. In his opinion, culture and art are no less important for people than material needs. When reflecting on the importance of ethnographic science, the scholar emphasises the need for a comprehensive study of the ‘development’ of the culture of different peoples, when old skills can be useful for meeting the modern needs. In the last section, he argues that a new generation of researchers is necessary to ensure the continuity of academic knowledge. The geographical education received by R.K. Gareeva, as N.I. Vorobyev is convinced, will help her look at traditional culture much more broadly. The second letter of Rufa (Raufa) Karimovna is not as worrisome as the first one. She expressed gratitude to Vorobyev for the answer and, inspired, she reports on her research plans to collect ethnographic materials on the culture of the Tatars and on preparation for entering graduate school. The revealed epistolary documents made it possible to reveal the subtle aspects of the formation and development of ethnological science in the Volga region, the importance of the individual/teacher in the professional development of researchers of the traditional culture of the peoples of the region.
Tatarstan Academy of Sciences
Title: “My work... was not in vain”
Description:
The publication is a commentary and texts of three previously unknown letters written to each other by N.
I.
Vorobyev and R.
K.
Gareeva (Urazmanova), who would later become the leading specialist in Tatar rites and holidays.
The conducted analysis of the document revealed the peculiarities of scholarly communication between these individuals, the emotions of an inexperienced but science-minded young school teacher who was involved in the research work, and the influence of Marxist-Leninist ideology on the understanding of the importance of the ethnography science in the Soviet times.
Gareeva’s first letter was written on January 23, 1961.
In the letter, she shared her concerns about not understanding the need for ethnography.
Vorobyev wrote her a detailed response in February of the same year.
Nikolai Iosifovich divided the letter into sections.
In the first part, when discussing the age of science and technology, he points out the spiritual needs.
In his opinion, culture and art are no less important for people than material needs.
When reflecting on the importance of ethnographic science, the scholar emphasises the need for a comprehensive study of the ‘development’ of the culture of different peoples, when old skills can be useful for meeting the modern needs.
In the last section, he argues that a new generation of researchers is necessary to ensure the continuity of academic knowledge.
The geographical education received by R.
K.
Gareeva, as N.
I.
Vorobyev is convinced, will help her look at traditional culture much more broadly.
The second letter of Rufa (Raufa) Karimovna is not as worrisome as the first one.
She expressed gratitude to Vorobyev for the answer and, inspired, she reports on her research plans to collect ethnographic materials on the culture of the Tatars and on preparation for entering graduate school.
The revealed epistolary documents made it possible to reveal the subtle aspects of the formation and development of ethnological science in the Volga region, the importance of the individual/teacher in the professional development of researchers of the traditional culture of the peoples of the region.
Related Results
Human papillomavirus in vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia
Human papillomavirus in vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia
AbstractThere are limited data on the prevalence and distribution of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes in vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN). We sought to clarify this iss...
Work Values
Work Values
Research has identified TV series and, also more recently social media, as different actors in vocational socialization, providing individuals with career-related information (Levi...
HPV prevalence and Detection Sensitivity in Vaginal Intraepithelial Neoplasia: a hospital-based study
HPV prevalence and Detection Sensitivity in Vaginal Intraepithelial Neoplasia: a hospital-based study
Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VaIN) always diagnosed through
coloscopy accidentally when the cervical cancer screening was abnormal.
A precise estimate of the detection rate o...
A single-institutional retrospective analysis of related factors for vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia
A single-institutional retrospective analysis of related factors for vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia
Abstract
Background
To date, there are only a few studies on the related factors of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VaIN). This study analyzes the features of VaIN and ...
Chemical constituents of the lichen Usnea lapponica Vain., Parmeliaceae
Chemical constituents of the lichen Usnea lapponica Vain., Parmeliaceae
Introduction: The lichen Usnea lapponica Vain. belonging to the Usnea genus (family Parmeliaceae) grow hanging from tree branches in the damp forest at Bidoup Nui Ba National Park,...
High‐grade vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia: can we be selective about who we treat?
High‐grade vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia: can we be selective about who we treat?
ObjectiveTo determine the role of conservative management in high‐grade vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (HG VaIN).DesignRetrospective observational study.SettingNorthern Gynaecol...
Preliminary study of HPV integration status on the occurrence and development of Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia
Preliminary study of HPV integration status on the occurrence and development of Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia
Abstract
Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasm (VaIN), a precancerous lesion of vaginal cancer, increased distinctly in the past decade, while its occurrence after performing hy...
Lichen Diversity in the Terai Regions of Uttar Pradesh, India
Lichen Diversity in the Terai Regions of Uttar Pradesh, India
Terai regions of Uttar Pradesh is one of the richest area for lichen diversity in the state represented by 81 species under 37 genera and 23 families. Out of these, 66 species are ...

